Impact of Social Sciences
Maximizing the impact of academic research
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About the project
    • About the blog
    • Our blog family
    • Blog Contributors
    • How to cite our blogs
  • Events
    • Social Science in the Public Sphere – 2nd July, 2013
    • Impact Conference 2012
    • Visualisations of our research
  • The Handbook
    • Executive Summary
    • Introduction: Defining Research Impacts
    • 1: What shapes the citing of academic publications
    • 2: Using citation tracking systems
    • 3: Key Measures of Academic Influence
    • 4: Getting Better Cited
    • 5: Patterns of external research impacts
    • 6: Is there an impacts gap?
    • 7: How researchers achieve external impacts
    • 8: Organisational impacts
    • 9: Expanding external research impacts
    • Bibliography
    • Links
      • RISE
      • METRIS: country reports
      • Other Links
    • Annex 1: Impacts Project Database
  • Twitter Guide
  • Academic Podcasting
    • Academic Podcasting
    • Audible Impact
  • Resources
  • REF 2014
  • Popular Posts
← 5 Minutes with Steve Keen: “Hopefully George Osborne may end up reading a blog that throws up an idea that looks outside the mainstream advice”
How predictable is the REF? →

Apr 23 2012

Something old, something new: opening a new path to public engagement with the most traditional of academic tools

Posted on April 23, 2012 by Blog Admin
Share

Academic communication is changing; it’s becoming faster, more interactive, and more open. In response to academia’s transition online, the LSE today launches the LSE Review of Books blog. Publishing daily reviews of academic and serious books across the social sciences and providing readers with informative, well written, and timely reviews, the LSE Review of Books’ mission is to improve public engagement with the social sciences via involvement with their best written and most accessible products – books and ebooks. Here, editors Patrick Dunleavy and Amy Mollett tell us why now is the perfect time to launch the blog.

It will come as no surprise to readers of the Impact blog that academic communication is changing. With coverage from many contributors of the spirited debates on Elsevier and expensive journal pay walls, and the possibilities of making impact via online engagement, it is clear to see that the traditional routes are giving way to new forms of academic discussion.

Within the social sciences, books are an increasingly important means of inter-disciplinary learning and debate. However, existing, highly-siloed academic review channels have typically inhibited cross-disciplinary communication, mostly take months or years to cover new books, and are hidden behind journal pay walls. The LSE Review of Books aims to radically reduce the existing time-lags in getting social science books reviewed, and to bring reviews out from behind pay walls so that they are free for anyone to access worldwide. From the outset the LSE Review of Books is configured for the new epoch when books are primarily published and read in digital forms, and when many more serious non-fiction books are read by an increasingly well-informed and well-educated public.

We aim to eventually review books across all the major social science disciplines, and to cover significant related work in neighbouring areas of the humanities, technology and the physical sciences. But to begin with our reviews are grouped into the following areas: Economics and Business Studies, Environment and Climate Change, Gender Studies, Law and Human Rights, Media and Cultural Studies, Philosophy and the Humanities, Politics and IR, and Sociology and Anthropology.

Improving how we share and exchange knowledge doesn’t just mean publishing academic book reviews. Tapping fully into the growing academic community online means that we’re going further to encourage discussion at all levels. Each week we will publish an account by a social scientist explaining which books inspired them to go into academia. Our aim is to build up a large archive of interesting and thought provoking accounts on the passion and inspiration that lies behind some of the most important social science work. In the coming months we’ll also feature a series of guest posts on what the future holds for academic books.

We’re also taking advantage of social media to make the experience of book review discussion and debate much more interactive. We’ll be using Pinterest to create collaborative virtual pin boards of photos, archive material, and videos connected to the social science disciplines. We’ll be producing podcasts with academics and authors about their latest books and research, themed around topics including the legacy of the Olympics, feminism in the 21st century, and the importance of the arts. We hope that our regular Twitter and Facebook posts will also continue to create a community around the blog.

Print Friendly
Share

Related posts:

  1. Don’t swap the “Ivory Tower” for a cyber one: public engagement and the internet
  2. The REF follows a model which ignores academic engagement with the public and is already being rejected by US researchers for being ‘outdated’.
  3. Aiming to create impacts on societies in 14 countries, the collaborative MYPLACE project partners traditional journal publishing with a continuous online presence.
  4. Five minutes with Alice Roberts: “During my academic career I’ve encountered considerable opposition to engagement with the public”
  5. The search for the academic arctic monkey: why we must maximise the exposure of research through a blend of traditional and new methods of publication
This entry was posted in Academic communication, Academic Publishing, Impact, Knowledge Transfer and tagged Academic communication, academic publishing, academic writing, Blogging, digital era, impact, public engagement. Bookmark the permalink.
← 5 Minutes with Steve Keen: “Hopefully George Osborne may end up reading a blog that throws up an idea that looks outside the mainstream advice”
How predictable is the REF? →
  • RSS Feed Twitter Facebook
  • Tweets by @LSEImpactBlog
  • Recent Posts

    • Soapbox Science: spontaneous public engagement as a persuasive platform to promote women in science
    • Academics may not be celebrities, but their careful research is improving public policy
    • The old paradigm of a single definitive study in the social sciences should be abandoned
    • Book Review: Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature
    • Regardless of intelligence, expertise or field, the types of human errors holding back research advancement are much the same
  • Guide to using Twitter in university research, teaching, and impact activities

     Guide to using Twitter in university research, teaching, and impact activities
  • Podcasts on measuring your impact, the REF, and academic communication

    LIsten to podcasts
  • Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists

    Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists
  • Subscribe by email

  • Categories

    • Academic communication
    • Academic Inspiration
    • Academic Publishing
    • Book Reviews
    • Citations
    • Elsevier Boycott
    • Essential 'how-to' Guides
    • Events
    • Evidence-based Policy
    • Evidence-based Research
    • Five minutes with…
    • Government
    • Higher Education
    • Impact
    • Impact Conference 2011
    • Impact Conference 2012
    • Knowledge Transfer
    • News
    • Open Access
    • Podcasting
    • Rankings
    • REF 2014
    • Research Ethics
    • Research funding
    • Research to Policy Event
    • Social Media
    • Top 5
    • Uncategorized
  • RSS THE News

  • Archives

  • LSE Review of Books Visit our sister blog: LSE Review of Books
  • LSE EUROPP blog Visit our sister blog: LSE EUROPP blog
  • LSE British Politics and Policy blog Visit our sister blog: LSE British Politics and Policy blog
  • Impact of Social Sciences blog Go home: the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog
© 2013 Impact of Social Sciences