LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Megan Tobias Neely

Donna Carmichael

April 20th, 2021

Profiting on Misery: how predatory shadow banks have exploited the coronavirus crisis

1 comment | 12 shares

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Megan Tobias Neely

Donna Carmichael

April 20th, 2021

Profiting on Misery: how predatory shadow banks have exploited the coronavirus crisis

1 comment | 12 shares

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented human and economic tragedy. To date, there have been over 124 million cases and 2.7 million deaths recorded worldwide, with nearly 30 million cases and over 540 thousand deaths in the United States alone, although these figures are growing on a daily basis. But not everyone is suffering to the same degree. While the economically vulnerable are experiencing vanishing jobs, reduced income, rising household debt and the increasing risk of evictions, wealthy investors are reaping financial gains from opportunistic investments.

Despite these dire health and economic conditions, U.S. financial markets are soaring as investors plough capital into financial markets in anticipation of substantial profits on investments that can exploit the pandemic. This upswing in stock values illustrates how a tiny proportion of the population can use their financial capital to profit from the crisis.

While the vast majority of people face unprecedented health and economic heartache and hardship, U.S. billionaires increased their wealth by $1 trillion, over one-third, from March to December of 2020. The S&P 500 surged throughout 2020, closing the year at a record high with an increase of 16.3% over 2019, despite dramatic rises in unemployment and business closures nationwide. Wealthy individuals and institutional investors (such as pension funds and university endowments) are actively investing their capital, and in particular, are flocking to shadow banks, which can provide high-return investments during crises.

Shadow banks refer to less regulated, private credit intermediaries such as private equity, venture capital, and hedge fund firms. While the general public is mostly unaware of shadow banking, it has been one of the fastest growing areas of finance since the early 1980s. For example, the volume of global hedge fund AUM (assets under management) is expected to grow by 19.6% over the next five years, reaching an estimated US $4.3 trillion (Figure 1) in 2025.

Figure 1: Global Hedge Fund AUM Source: Preqin Future of Alternatives 2025. Reproduced with Permission. *2020 figure is annualized based on data to October 2021, and 2021-2025 are Preqin’s forecasted figures. Actual FY2020 AUM reported on February 24th 2021 by Preqin was US $4 trillion.

In our recent article in American Behavioral Scientist, we examine how U.S. shadow banks are extracting profit by investing in ways that benefit from the misfortunes of exploited workers, struggling companies, and distressed sectors. The pandemic has caused a number of sectors to struggle, such as the airline, energy, and hospitality sectors. As a result, many companies in these sectors have seen their share prices sharply drop as their revenue plummets and investors sell off their shares. This is where shadow banks come in: Hedge funds, in particular, have swooped in to short-sell—bet against—these companies’s stocks as they decrease in value (which is what hedge funds did that sparked the “GameStop Rebellion”).

As you read this, shadow banks are scouring the economy for flailing companies to short-sell the stock and pocket substantial profits. For example, hedge fund investor Carl Icahn garnered a remarkable $1.3 billion profit by short-selling stocks in shopping malls hit hard by COVID-19 restrictions. And the hedge fund Woodson Capital Management shorted bricks-and-mortar retail businesses, and invested in e-commerce companies. The assets in their portfolio have since skyrocketed from $675 million to $1.7 billion.

In addition to shorting hard-hit company stocks, hedge funds capitalized on the stock market crash following the emergency shutdowns in response to the pandemic. In mid-February of 2020, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman anticipated stocks would free-fall at the onset of the pandemic and took out insurance on various bond indexes. (These insurance contracts pay out when the indexes, pegged to a section of the bond market, fail). Ackman invested $27 million on March 3rd. Then, betting that the markets would rally when the  federal government intervened, he divested on March 23rd, the day the U.S. Federal Reserve announced new programs to support the plummeting economy. Ackman turned a $2.6 billion profit! And he was not alone. Miami-based hedge fund Universa Investments made over a 4,000% return.

Although many economic sectors are suffering during the pandemic, others are exploding because of pandemic-induced demand. Investors are profiting from vaccine-related stocks and “work from home” stocks—such as Zoom (online conferencing), Amazon (online sales) and Staples (home office products), along with other companies in the healthcare, technology and communications industries. For example, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’ wealth grew by an estimated $71 billion from March to December of 2020, thanks to his ballooning stock holdings.

While the most economically vulnerable have suffered the brunt of the pandemic’s devastation (in ways that have worsened gender, racial, and social class inequalities), those with financial capital have gleaned profits from struggling and booming sectors alike. This has created a financialized caste system in which some workers carry out the difficult and risky work of fighting the pandemic, while another group simultaneously funds and exploits these efforts from the safety of their homes, reaping the rewards because it holds the capital in a rentier capitalist system.

How can we, as a society, curb the predatory investments of those with substantial capital that exploit the wellbeing and livelihoods of the rest of society? Tax and regulatory reforms are a possible avenue, including U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s proposals for new controls on private equity firms. Another way forward includes enhanced democratization of corporate decision-making and expanded representation of stakeholders such as workers, consumers, and communities on U.S. corporate boards. But as long as shadow banks can operate with minimal oversight, the exploitative and speculative nature of predatory finance will continue to capitalize on future crises.

 

This post draws on: Neely, M. T. and Carmichael, D. (2021), ‘Profiting on Crisis: How Predatory Financial Investors Have Worsened Inequality in the Coronavirus Crisis’, American Behavioral Scientist. doi: 10.1177/00027642211003162.

About the author

Megan Tobias Neely

Megan Tobias Neely is assistant professor of organization at Copenhagen Business School. Her research examines rising economic inequality through the lens of gender, race, and class. Her first book, Divested: Inequality in the Age of Finance (Oxford University Press, 2020) with Ken-Hou Lin, demonstrates why widening inequality in the United States cannot be understood without examining the rise of big finance. Her forthcoming book, Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street (University of California Press), investigates why the hedge fund industry garners extreme wealth, why mostly white men benefit, and how reforming Wall Street could create a more equal society.

Donna Carmichael

Donna Carmichael is a PhD Researcher in Sociology at the London School of Economics. Her research examines the rise of private capital markets, and the role of wealth accumulation via financial investing in escalating economic inequality. Prior to undertaking her PhD studies, she completed an MBA at York University in Toronto, followed by many years in industry in a variety of global roles.

Posted In: Economic Sociology | Social Inequalities

1 Comments