Share this:

gregg-colburn-80x108ryan-allen-80x108Despite growth in the US economy after the Great Recession, more than half of households that rent pay more than 30 percent of their income towards their accommodation. In new research, Gregg Colburn and Ryan Allen find that major differences in rent burden between households are likely due to income, geography, and household size. With more households renting, they argue that policymakers must do more to address housing affordability in the US.

In the aftermath of the Great recession, the percentage of households facing high rent burdens in the US reached historically high levels.  A household is rent burdened when the percentage of income used to pay the rent exceeds 30 percent.  According to many studies, the percentage of rent burdened households in the US now exceeds 50 percent.  The prevalence of such high rent burdens is a major public policy problem because large rent expenditures have the potential to crowd out other essential spending on food, clothing, and healthcare.  Inadequate spending on basic needs is associated with a wide range of health and social problems for adults and children.

Many factors have converged to produce the historically high levels of rent burden.  First, households have shifted to the rental market in response to the recent foreclosure crisis and tighter mortgage lending standards in the US. Second, during the recession, the construction of multi-family housing units failed to keep pace with the increased demand for rental housing.  Last, household incomes among low and middle income earners have stagnated.  The result of these dynamics is higher rents, lower vacancy rates, and increased rates of rent burden.

Our initial analysis found that households with the following traits experience higher rates of rent burden: lower incomes, presence of children, headed by women, non-white, and foreign born. In addition, households in metropolitan areas and in the northeast and west regions of the US are more likely to experience rent burden. However, when we used regression models to enhance our understanding, our results indicated that race and place of birth don’t actually predict people’s rent burdens.

Instead, the disparities in rent burdens between different racial groups and those born in the US and elsewhere are likely the product of other factors, such as income disparities. In fact, our models suggest that income, household size, and the presence of children are associated with a statistically significant increase in the probability of a household facing rent burden.  Geography also plays an important role as households in metropolitan areas were more likely to face rent burden as are households in the northeastern and western regions of the country.

In addition to predicting rent burden, we also compare rent burdens both before and after the Great Recession.  Our analysis suggests that low and middle income renter households faced more challenging conditions in the period immediately following the recession.  First, rent burdens increased significantly after the recession and higher income households faced rent burden at higher rates than before the recession.  Second, overcoming rent burdens became more challenging after the recession as tight rental market conditions and stagnating earnings may have frustrated efforts by households for their rent to make up less of their spending. Third, moving—a tool used by households to overcome their rent burden in the years before the recession—was not an effective mechanism to escape rent burden post-recession.  Finally, households relied on increases in household size, which had the effect of increasing household income, in order to escape rent burden in the post-recession period.

Figure 1 shows the predicted probabilities for exiting rent burden in 2010 for households that either (i) increase or (ii) hold constant the number of adults in the household.  The graphic demonstrates that the likelihood of exiting rent burden was much greater for those households that increased household size.  These findings suggest that the rental market dynamics in the wake of the Great Recession have created challenging conditions for low-income and middle-income households in the US.

Figure 1 – Predicted Probabilities for Exiting Rent Burden for Households with an Increase and No Change in the Number of Adults in the Household (2010) 


Note: Predicted probabilities are based on results from the model of rent burden exit for 2010 in Table 5. The predicted probabilities assume a range of household incomes for a native-born black, married, male-headed, non-doubled-up renter household with at least one child living in a metropolitan area of the West region of the US. Source: Survey of Income and Program Participation

The current challenges facing renter households have become a public policy problem that has received the attention of all levels of government, and our findings are relevant for advocates and policymakers concerned about housing affordability in the US. Potential solutions to address this problem include reducing restrictions on residential density in exchange for the inclusion of affordable, subsidized housing.  Such a policy would increase the supply of housing and reduce the cost to build housing, while producing housing that is specifically affordable to lower income households.  Alternatively, policymakers could take steps to increase the disposable income of renter households by allowing renter households to deduct rental payments from their taxes.  Another technique would be to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit program that would provide additional income that households could use to defray housing costs.

As more households are renting than at any time since the 1960s, there is a clear and present need to address the significant housing affordability crisis in the US. Evidence from this study, and many others, provide policymakers and advocates the data that is needed to make a case for new policies to address housing affordability in the US.

This article is based on the paper, ‘Rent burden and the Great Recession in the USA’ in Urban Studies. 

Featured image credit: Shane Adams (Flickr, CC-BY-2.0)

Please read our comments policy before commenting.             

Note:  This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of USAPP– American Politics and Policy, nor of the London School of Economics. 

Shortened URL for this post:


About the authors 

gregg-colburn-80x108Gregg Colburn – University of Minnesota
Gregg Colburn is a Ph.D. candidate in public policy at the Humphrey School at the University of Minnesota. The focus of his research is social policy, the welfare state, housing policy and homelessness. In his dissertation, Gregg is analyzing the use of markets in the delivery of welfare benefits.  


ryan-allen-80x108Ryan Allen – University of Minnesota
Ryan Allen is an associate professor of community and economic development at the University of Minnesota. His research focuses on the community and economic development processes of immigrants in the United States.  Recently, he has focused on how households have responded to the foreclosure crisis as well as how the foreclosure crisis has affected neighborhood quality in the U.S.  He is also interested in immigrant home ownership and entrepreneurship.

Print Friendly