LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Robert H. Wade

September 17th, 2021

Don’t frame the debate just around decarbonisation

0 comments | 2 shares

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

Robert H. Wade

September 17th, 2021

Don’t frame the debate just around decarbonisation

0 comments | 2 shares

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

Professor Robert Wade responds to Martin Sandbu’s column “Climate action must navigate culture wars” and the Financial Times editorial on “Don’t let climate goals get lost in culture wars”.

Letter: Don’t frame the debate just around decarbonisation, Financial Times, 16 September 2021  

From Prof. Robert H. Wade

Your editorial “Don’t let climate goals get lost in culture wars” (FT View, August 31) and Martin Sandbu’s column “Climate action must navigate culture wars” (Opinion, September 8) are both right to stress the importance not just of policies but also of “getting the politics right so as to build broad-based support for what needs to be done”.

But “what needs to be done” should not be framed only in terms of decarbonisation or getting to “net-zero”. To do that by 2050 (given that 80 per cent of world energy use now comes from fossil fuels) requires roughly halving carbon emissions each decade. China, India, Russia, Japan and others are now making large fossil fuel investments, and the world population likely to increase by 2 bn by 2050. We have to plan for it not being feasible to get close to eliminating fossil fuels by 2050, or even 2075.

That means complementing efforts to speed up deployment of renewables with major investment in techniques for removing carbon from the atmosphere, raising the reflectivity of the earth, and adapting to the rise in global temperatures that is already baked in.

This broader agenda is likely to be more effective in slowing global warming and softening the culture wars — and interstate wars — that global warming is likely to bring.

Robert H Wade

Professor of Global Political Economy

Department of International Development

London School of Economics, UK

 


The views expressed in this post are those of the author and in no way reflect those of the International Development LSE blog or the London School of Economics and Political Science. You can read an article by Robert Wade on the polarisation of the climate change debate here.

Photo credit: Damian Bakarcic on Flickr

About the author

Robert H. Wade

New Zealander, educated Washington DC, New Zealand, Sussex University. Worked at Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, 1972-95, World Bank, 1984-88, Princeton Woodrow Wilson School 1989/90, MIT Sloan School 1992, Brown University 1996-2000.

Posted In: Climate Emergency | Featured | Topical and Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Falling Out-of-Pocket Expenditure in India’s Healthcare: What’s Behind the Trend?
    Healthcare in India is a critical sector, now being the most populous country in the world. Government initiatives and investment play a central role in providing both affordability and access. Vrinda Gupta examines the latest figures of the National Health Accounts, and analyses the possible causes that lie behind them.     The latest National Health […]
  • Environmental Degradation and the Future of Myanmar
    Damage to Myanmar’s environment has been constant and incremental under decades of military rule. Averse to international aid and assistance — which has not been particularly high in any case — the junta has been ploughing the country’s natural resources for revenue. Declining law and order and political control has led to further illegal activities […]