LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Ribale Sleiman-Haidar

October 28th, 2014

Islam and Social Media

25 comments | 85 shares

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Ribale Sleiman-Haidar

October 28th, 2014

Islam and Social Media

25 comments | 85 shares

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

by Dr Mohammed Ibahrine


Screen Shot 2014-10-16 at 14.52.30
Twitter profile of prominent Islamic preacher, Dr Mohammed Al-Arifi, twitter.com

Just as in other regions, countries with a Muslim majority have witnessed a rapid diffusion and adoption of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in recent times. In the Arab World, Facebook is still the leading social networking website with 81,302,064 users. Twitter follows with 5,797,500 users (Arab Social Media Report, 2014). The Arab Region is only second to the USA when it comes to the number of daily YouTube views. With 90 Million video views per day, Saudi Arabia has the world highest number of YouTube views per Internet user (Arab news, 2014).

The popularity of social media platforms in the Arab World has led some scholars to expect its impact on religious life to rise. The common argument is that social media has the potential to change people’s religiosity and practices of piety. The impact of social media on religious behaviours of individuals and communities in environments characterised by conservatism and traditionalism, it is argued, will be more profound than in environments characterised by liberalism and openness.

Communicating and winning the hearts and minds of believers and non-believers through da’wa is a central commitment for many Muslims and Islamic leaders. Today, social media has become an invaluable means to pursue the path of da’wa and the dissemination of the Muslim thoughts. Only very few voices condemn the use of the new digital media as incompatible with Islamic practices. For instance, Abdul Aziz Al Shaikh, Grand Mufti in Saudi Arabia, advances a critical stance towards social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter because, as he says, they disseminate lies and may destroy established relationships in the real world. In a similar line, religious authorities in some Islamic countries issued fatwas against the use of social media like Twitter, arguing for its incompatibility with shari’a because of trading accusations and promoting lies.

While some of the Islamic religious leaders advise their followers not to use social media platforms, the overwhelming majority of scholars and preachers capitalise on the effectiveness and efficiency of social media in engaging with the community of believers and enhance their fidelity and loyalty.

During the first generation of the Internet, there were some traditional websites like Islam Online that acted as a one stop-shop for religious information and comprehensive services to the Islamic ummah.

The mushrooming of digital platforms during the second era of the Internet led to a process of undermining the monopolistic nature of religious orthodoxies. For many, social media became an ideal platform, the new Mosque or madrasa, for the dissemination of the Islamic belief. These digital platforms led to the emergence of what some call “Facebook fatwas”. F-Fatwas introduced a new paradigm to the practice of religious instructions in the way they were formulated, issued, disseminated, received and acted upon. F-Fatwas sparked commentary and feedback among many sectors of Muslim societies, including religious authorities, Islamist intellectuals as well as young urban or secularised Muslims.

One type of Islamic use of social media platforms is proselytisation, which is widely popular amongst Islamic preachers. Mohammad Al-Arifi topped the list with nine million followers, second is Aid al-Qarni with seven million, followed by Ahammad al-Shugairi with six million (Twitter, 2014). Ironically enough, some deceased religious scholars have social media accounts in their names set up by their religious and intellectual followers in order to reach the younger generations.

The use of social media is not limited to religious leaders. Regular Muslims also tweet Qur’anic verses and hadith (prophetic sayings). The dissemination of religious content regularly reaches its peak during the ‘Ramadan Aperture’, when Muslims are internally and externally motivated to receive and process religious content in form of tweets. This new phenomenon changes the way the Islamic faith is promoted among believers and non-believers alike. Also, on the occasion of Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, some pilgrims tweet feeds and upload photos and clips offering a sense of virtual spirituality to their families. These practices contribute to the enhancement of co-religiousness and co-piety of the Islamic ummah.

All these practices indicate that social media is integrated in the habit of spreading the word of Allah and safeguarding Islam against critics from outside. Social media also created an Islamic popular diplomacy. This involves the global mobilisation of believers through virtual platforms, in case of individual or group attacks on the prophet or the Quran. Prominent examples are the videos of an American pastor planning to burn copies of the Quran in 2010 and the anti-Islam clip ‘Innocence of Muslims’. These videos have triggered a global mobilisation of Muslims protests on social media platforms. Countries such as Pakistan, Jordan and Egypt even requested from YouTube to delete the films.

Some conservative leaders called for the creation and launch of shari’a compliant halal social media platforms. As a response to these calls, a number of digital initiatives and projects were carried out. Islam-centered alternatives to Facebook such as Muslimsocial.com, Muxlim.com and SalamWorld started to appear; yet their adoption rate is still very low.

Social media has also opened up the opportunity, especially for young Muslims, to engage with their faith and their peers in a way their parents could never have imagined. Where once the ummah was a spiritual notion, with Muslim communities separated by language and geography, social media has broken barriers and enabled young Muslims to connect irrespective of where they are. It allows them to discuss what it means to be Muslim in the twenty first century, especially for those living in the West.

For some digital activists, social media provides the means for re-uniting the ummah in a form of e-ummah. Digital social platforms, they think, can contribute to the creation of virtual communities that may pave the way for eventual physical communities. Social media can hence support the global cohesion of believers by weaving links between community members worldwide. In some urban centers in North America and Western Europe, Islamic social media websites have contributed to the spread of Islamic icons and symbols among the members of the Muslim diaspora. Recent research has shown that young Muslims in Western societies are more receptive to religious beliefs and values and that Islam plays a key role in forming their identities (Choudhury, 2007). One indication of their religiosity is that they are likely to attend mosques more frequently.

In Europe and the United States, Islamic proselytising efforts have been exceptionally successful; with non-Muslims accepting invitations to convert to Islam. The personal videos of converters are even broadcasted on YouTube and discussed in virtual chat rooms.

The recent return and rise of Islam is spectacular. It has been argued that synergy of small media and social media have helped Islam to gain or regain a place in our contemporary social life. The continuous digitisation of Islam, or the Islamisation of the digital world, represent a challenge to the religion of Islam in the twenty first century, where closed systems are resisting the openness of instantly constant transparency and wikileaks effects.

For centuries, interpretations of the Quran were kept a reserved domain for a small minority of ulama (scholars of religion). Social networking websites have become avenues for disseminating sacred interpretations, sometimes undermining traditional religious authorities. The blossoming of digital fatwas is also an indication of the splintering of orthodoxies and the emergence of heresies. Consequently, religious authority has become a contested domain, rather than an accepted reality by the uneducated masses. Social media may fade out, yet the process of digitalisation of Islam or Islamisation of digital is here to stay.


Further Readings

Bunt, G. iMuslims: Rewiring the House of Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.

Choudhury. T. The Role of Muslim Identity Politics in Radicalisation, the Department for Communities and Local Government, (2007)

Dubai School of Government, “Arab Social Media Report.” http://www.arabsocialmediareport.com (Accessed October 2014).

Khan, F. “90 million videos viewed daily on YouTube in KSA.” http://www.arabnews.com/news/536196 (Accessed October 2014).

Howard, P. The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.


@00037500Dr Mohammed Ibahrine is Associate Professor of Mass Communication at the American University of Sharjah. He was Visiting Fellow at the MEC in the summer of 2014. While based at the Centre, he worked on his upcoming book on digital communication and socio-political change in the Arab world.


 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the author

Ribale Sleiman-Haidar

Posted In: Research

25 Comments

Bad Behavior has blocked 2647 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: