LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Dunia Essam Hassanin

October 17th, 2024

What Lessons Do Two Pivotal Strikes Against Israel, Separated by Decades, Teach Us About the Nature of Warfare?

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Dunia Essam Hassanin

October 17th, 2024

What Lessons Do Two Pivotal Strikes Against Israel, Separated by Decades, Teach Us About the Nature of Warfare?

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

by Dunia Essam Hassanin

Yom Kippur War, 1973. Source: Wikimedia.

Certain incidents in military history stand out not just for their immediate impact, but also for the long-term lessons they teach. The surprise attacks on Israel—first by Egyptian troops on October 6, 1973, and then by Hamas on October 7, 2023—provide critical case studies for understanding the nature of warfare, particularly in asymmetric wars. Despite being decades separated, these two critical episodes show essential truths about strategy, tactics, and the psychological components of combat.

The October War of 1973 began with a meticulously planned surprise attack by Egypt and Syria on Israel. This strategic timing was not coincidence; it was a deliberate choice designed to exploit Israel’s vulnerabilities. Israeli soldiers were caught off surprise and suffered serious defeats. The Egyptian military’s ability to cross the Suez Canal and push into Sinai demonstrated the value of surprise as a tactical tool. The early success of this operation demonstrated an important lesson in warfare: gaining the initiative and striking when the opponent is least prepared.

Fast-forward to October 7, 2023, when Hamas suddenly and systematically attacked Israel from the Gaza Strip. Like the surprise element of the 1973 War, this strike used overwhelming force and timing to have a psychological effect. To shock Israeli society and erode trust in its security apparatus, Hamas attempted to take advantage of times when things were relatively peaceful. The similarities between these two attacks highlight a crucial military principle: surprise is a great equaliser, especially for forces that are asymmetrical and up against a stronger foe.

The fallout from both strikes serves as an example of how intricately military operations interact with political repercussions, as well as how complicated combat is. Israel significantly reevaluated its military strategy and intelligence capabilities following the 1973 War. Israeli authorities were obliged to acknowledge the shortcomings of their intelligence-gathering systems and the necessity for increased vigilance because of the initial surprise and subsequent military failures. In the end, this reassessment produced a more complex comprehension of regional dynamics as well as a change in foreign policy, which culminated in diplomatic achievements like the Camp David Accords. On the other hand, the attack carried out by Hamas in 2023 brought about fresh security worries and a renewed cycle of violence, but it also brought attention to the ongoing difficulties that remain unaddressed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Although Hamas aimed to show off its military prowess, the long-term effects of their actions have made peace less likely. Extremist strategies have found favor because of the occupation and the continuous incapacity to resolve the fundamental complaints of the Palestinian people. As a result, the lesson learned from this conflict emphasises the significance of both military readiness and the requirement of resolving conflicts through diplomatic channels.

Another important lesson about warfare that both attacks help to highlight is the importance of regional alliances and outside assistance. Egypt benefited greatly from Soviet support during the 1973 War, which improved Egypt’s military might and strategy. This outside assistance was vital to the dynamics of the battle, proving that alliances have a big impact on how wars turn out. In the current environment, regional entities such as Iran, which has given financial backing and military training, have supported Hamas’s operations in a number of ways. The dependence on outside alliances emphasises how critical it is to comprehend world geopolitics while evaluating armed conflicts.

In addition, it is important to consider the psychological aspects of combat when analysing these two crucial hits. In today’s wars, the capacity to influence narratives and public opinion has grown more and more important. Egypt’s early victories following the 1973 War helped it to recapture the narrative of pride and resiliency, which aided in sustaining support for the Sadat regime. In a similar vein, the October 2023 attack by Hamas sought to garner support from friendly nations and the Palestinian people in addition to achieving its military goals. The psychological fallout from military operations can have a significant impact on public opinion, morale, and the overall strategic environment.

It is imperative that we recognise how warfare is changing as we consider the lessons to be learned from these two strikes against Israel. The distinction between asymmetric and conventional warfare is frequently blurred in contemporary conflicts as non-state actors confront state forces by utilising technology and more complex tactics. The emergence of guerilla warfare, information campaigns, and cyberwarfare all point to a change in the nature of wars and highlight the need for states to modify their approaches in response to evolving circumstances.

In conclusion, the unexpected strikes on 6 October 1973, and 7 October 2023 provide important new perspectives on the nature of war and the intricacies of conflicts in the Middle East. The value of surprise as a technique, the need to resolve underlying grievances to achieve enduring peace, the need for outside assistance, and the influence of psychological factors on public opinion are all highlighted by these two incidents. As we examine these crucial historical times, we must apply these lessons to upcoming conflicts, understanding that the difficulties of war are not just military but also intricately linked to social, political, and psychological elements. The long-lasting effects of these strikes serve as a reminder that comprehending the past is crucial to resolving the complexity of current disputes and advancing the cause of a more secure and tranquil future.


[To read more on this and everything Middle East, the LSE Middle East Centre Library is now open for browsing and borrowing for LSE students and staff. For more information, please visit the MEC Library page.]

 

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the author

Dunia Essam Hassanin

Dunia Essam Hassanin is a master's student in International Relations and serves as a graduate teaching assistant at the American University in Cairo. Her career interests lie at the nexus of foreign policy and Middle Eastern studies. She tweets at @_Donnaessam

Posted In: Egypt | Israel | Palestine

Leave a Reply

Bad Behavior has blocked 1142 access attempts in the last 7 days.