Nov 26 2015

How Buddhism Views Happiness

Leave a comment

What insights does the Tibetan Buddhist tradition have to share about the pursuit of happiness?

In the UK today one in six people suffer from depression or anxiety disorders. We enjoy a high standard of living but happiness is often illusive. How might the practice of meditation contribute towards a happier life and how integral is the religious or spiritual dimension of this practice?

Khenpdo Sodargye has become one of the most eminent contemporary Buddhist masters.

As a Tibetan lama, a Buddhist scholar and teacher, a prolific translator into Chinese, and a modern Buddhist thinker, he is renowned across Asia and the West for his interest in the integration of traditional Buddhist teachings with global issues and modern life.

Thomas Tozer, a postgraduate Philosophy student at LSE, shares his reflections on Khenpo Sodargye’s talk, organised by the LSE Faith Centre.

“It was a rare and special honour to attend the talk by Khenpo Sodargye. Despite having only been at the LSE for about a month, I had already attended many different talks – some very interesting, some not so much. But no talk was anything like the talk that I was about to hear from Khenpo. Continue reading

Posted by: Posted on by Rebecca Hardie

Apr 15 2015

Memorable Mondays: An LSE Faith & Leadership Testimonial

Comments Off on Memorable Mondays: An LSE Faith & Leadership Testimonial
Greg Doolittle

Greg Doolittle


Greg Doolittle, MSC in International Development and Humanitarian Emergencies, and one of the first cohort of LSE Faith & Leadership, relates his experience of participating in the Faith Centre’s innovative extra-curricular certificate in religious literacy and effective leadership for the contemporary world.  


photo 4

From the introductory session, ‘Free to Believe?’, led by LSE Chaplain and Interfaith Adviser the Rev. Dr James Walters

The LSE Faith Centre undertook a pilot program this Lent Term, convening an extracurricular program in Faith & Leadership in which I participated.  A group of around twenty students was selected to participate and that group met for eight weeks out of the term. Diverse even by the standards of the LSE, the group included postgrad and undergrad students from all major world religions with representatives from some of the smaller ones as well.

Faith & Leadership in session

Faith & Leadership in session

Although no preparatory readings were required and no exam was administered, we engaged in remarkably earnest discussions regularly into the late Monday evenings; the course became a highlight of my week.


A Faith and Leadership group (from left): Fayyadh Shamsuddin, Greg Doolittle, Suzanna Nesom, Mary Chu and Kara Dunford.

Our sessions had a distinct character to them. For the first few minutes we met in a small subset that remained constant all throughout the course, with which we sat and with which we began the evening in reflection on the previous week’s speaker. My subset was made up of four individuals plus myself; none of us were coreligionists; two were male, three female; we were both undergrads and postgrads; three different nationalities were represented. This made for quite a diversity of perspective on any issue that came up, with some of us bringing lived experience to bear on a given issue, while others of us brought more learned knowledge, and still others of us brought only our curiosity. It was wonderful to watch each other increase our body of knowledge concerning  religious issues as the program unfolded.

Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad holds the Faith & Leadership students spellbound.

Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad holds the Faith & Leadership students spellbound.

Through the lens of these discussion subsets we viewed some incredible guest lecturers of which I’ve chosen to highlight three. The speakers were an undeniable asset of the program, reason enough to merit my continued participation, and I learned a great deal even from the speakers I’ve left out of this writing. Rabbi Shoshana Boyd Gelfand led the group through a comprehensive review of the different periods of Jewish history and thought before explaining to the class that she herself was a Jewish atheist, rejecting the existence of G-D but identifying with the cultural and literary achievements of Judaism; this provoked the sort of discussion that lasts for weeks at a low boil, on how someone could be a Rabbi and a leader of the Jewish community and not believe in a higher power.  Another compelling speaker was Simon Keyes, the former director of St Ethelburga’s Centre for Reconciliation and Peace, who came to discuss mediation as he had experienced it while working with IRA members and British army veterans to engage in peacebuilding dialogues; the procedures in place to get these former adversaries talking to one another in a constructive way was fascinating to me and the rest of us in the program, who had never really considered the practicalities of getting religiously-motivated adversaries to the discussion table. Perhaps the most compelling speaker in the series was Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad formerly known as Timothy Winter, Dean of the Cambridge Muslim College and one of the most influential Sunni Muslims in the world. He spoke topically about radicalism within global Islam as one who has counselled against it from within, while also providing an authoritative primer on the basic constructs of the faith. The speakers were certainly the centrepiece of the program, and rightly so.

 Another selling point of the program was its culminating retreat. All 20 of the participants were invited to a residential at The Royal Foundation of St. Katherine, a centre for religious conventions and gatherings in Limehouse.

The full cohort of the pilot run of F&L on the weekend residential.

The full cohort of the pilot run of F&L on the weekend residential.

Aside from staying in what amounted to a hotel and being fed home-cooked dinners and regularly served teas, the residential provided a space for us to hear from even more excellent speakers but, perhaps more importantly, to reflect on all that we’d learned over the course of the program. The speakers from the retreat that stuck with me the most were Michael Binyon, a Leader Writer for The Times, who spoke about how faith is approached in the media, and Stephen Timms, an MP and Labour Party Faith envoy who told of the time he was stabbed by a fanatic and what he learned from the experience. At the end of a reflective two days we were awarded our Faith & Leadership Certificates and we dispersed with greater religious literacy and, I think, with a few new friends as well.

Jasvir Singh of the City Sikh Network, and Nava Ashraf of Harvard Business School contributing to a session of Faith and the City

Jasvir Singh of the City Sikh Network, and Nava Ashraf of Harvard Business School contributing to a session on Faith and the City

Speaking only for myself, I found the Faith & Leadership program to be well worth my time. I learned a great deal about religion generally but what I found was far more useful was the exposure to religious practitioners who acted as primary source documents, cutting through media narratives and whatever preconceived notions I had about a religion, exposing me to how a faith’s practitioners thought and felt, straight from the source. It also enabled me to interact with a group of strong young professionals at LSE that I would probably not have been exposed to otherwise, who shared my curiosity about things religious. I would highly recommend the program; you could do far worse with your Monday evenings.


Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Apr 10 2015

Keeping Our Wits Warm to the Things that Are

Comments Off on Keeping Our Wits Warm to the Things that Are

A Literary Festival Fringe Event at the LSE Faith Centre

s200_jacob phillips (1) (2)

Faith Centre Coordinator Jacob Phillips reflects on the LSE Literary Fringe event – Foundations of Faith – held at the LSE Faith Centre. 

A few weeks back, the LSE Faith Centre hosted a conversation between Graham Ward (Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Oxford and author of Unbelievable: why we believe and why we don’t), and the critically acclaimed novelist Sarah Perry (author of After Me Comes the Flood). The discussion centred on the role of faith and belief in life and literature, chaired by the LSE chaplain and interfaith adviser James Walters. A breathtaking range of topics were covered, including how faith and knowledge can be unsettled and disrupted, how such experiences might serve to uncover hitherto unacknowledged dimensions of belief as fundamental to human experience, and – if belief is of such foundational importance – how it can take shape in unexpected forms beyond the explicitly ‘religious’. One striking example of this mentioned by Sarah Perry is Gerald Manley Hopkin’s  ode to the beauty of the natural world in The Windhover. Perry spoke of reciting this masterpiece from memory at certain moments in life, leading her to reflect on language as a sacrament, to which she is ‘utterly, utterly enthralled in a way that’s slightly indecent’.  The vision of faith and belief which began to emerge through the course of this discussion reminded me of another of Hopkins’ poems, his ode to human artifice in To What Serves Mortal Beauty?. This seems apt because Graham Ward described belief as an intrinsically human activity from earliest times, which suggests it is linked with what humans form in the pursuit of beauty. What sprang to mind here was Hopkins’ comment that human creative beauty  ‘keeps men’s wits warm to things that are’, which seemed to resonate with the understanding of belief as grounding our apprehension of reality in  this discussion. In this sense, we might understand faith and belief as – similarly – keeping our ‘wits warm to the things that are’.

Ward's Unbelievable

Ward’s Unbelievable

In the first place, both Graham Ward and Sarah Perry offered stories from their own writings relating to different ways in which belief can be shaken or unsettled. Graham Ward spoke of a strange night at Peterhouse in Cambridge which begins his book Unbelievable, involving a close encounter with an as-yet unexplained entity, with all the hallmarks of the traditional ghost story. Ward related this encounter as ‘deeply challenging’, lead him to inquire into ways in which ‘believing is deeper’ than ‘mere conflicts of interpretation or rationality’. Sarah Perry spoke of the lead character in After Me Comes the Flood, Elijah, whose entire existence has been based on a straightforward religious belief which unravels, thus leaving him deeply disorientated. With Ward’s example, confidence in rational knowledge is unsettled leading him to inquire into belief, and with Perry’s example an uncritical or unexamined faith commitment is unsettled leading to a reassessment of that worldview. For Perry’s Elijah, there is a strong autobiographical element, as she spoke candidly of a fundamentalist Christian upbringing, in which people saw the King James Bible as a basic ‘Instruction Manual for the Human Being’. When such faith is disrupted, claimed Perry, the results are ‘terrifying’, for ‘when you have a faith paradigm you don’t have a back-up plan’.

So if faith can deaden and stultify (in the case of Perry’s Elijah), or enliven and vivify, as with Ward’s ghostly night at Peterhouse, in what sense can we think of the faith and belief as giving foundations for living? Interestingly, here Ward and Perry chimed with each other, both being concerned to describe how the unsettling of belief and/or knowledge leads into a deeper apprehension of reality, or what Hopkins calls: the ‘things that are’. For the former, Unbelievable draws on contemporary neuroscientific research, to offer a view of belief as undergirding human cognition in a way that far exceeds what has previously been thought. In this sense, belief is much more than subscribing to a religious worldview, or feeling confident  that one can deny the existence of ghosts. It is closer to structuring the very possibility of subscribing to anything, or affirming or denying the existence of anything. Ward talked about his discussion of the origins of belief, which can be tracked back to Neanderthal activities many millennia before our own, to argue that there is no ‘either/or’ or ‘black and white’ when it comes to belief and unbelief, but that believing and unbelieving configure the possibility of existing humanly in and of itself. In this connection Ward stated that ‘we never see something, we see something as’, meaning there is no observer-neutral perspective devoid of believing, but always some layer of believing assent rooted in the knower. This led him to claim, ‘if we only ever see as, we never see, then we are always dealing with our beliefs, not something called knowledge’.

Perry's critically acclaimed first novel

Perry’s critically acclaimed first novel

Sarah Perry spoke further on being moved from a straightforwardly prescriptive set of beliefs, to being unsettled into a more complex view of reality. It was therefore surprising to hear how she, like Graham Ward, saw faith and belief as still foundationally important, even if taking different forms to that experienced in her childhood. She spoke boldly on faith as a form of ‘insanity’, building on Walters’ observation that Elijah is assumed to be mad by other characters in her novel. However, she was clear that issues pertaining to faith and belief are deeply intertwined with her thinking to this day, in that she claimed that ‘I would dispense with what faith I have if I could, but I can’t’.

So both Perry and Ward saw that belief could function in a naïve foundational sense, or arise through liberation from such foundations, and they agreed that in both cases it serves as a foundation or structuring influence beyond what one might choose to subscribe to. So if belief can be wrongheaded and yet conditions the possibility of seeing ‘things that are’, how best should we understand it?  The answer to this perhaps comes from applying Hopkins’ comment on mortal beauty, to faith and belief, as things which ‘keeps men’s wits warm’. That is, authentic faith and belief do not merely bring ‘knowledge’ in the sense of corresponding to reality, but open us to wonder, warming and vivifying experience so that naïvely conceived foundations are enthused and set free by wonder.  In this connection we saw some of the most interesting comments of the evening, with Graham Ward expounding at length his amazement and wonder at the findings of neuroscience, which is surprising to those familiar with his work in recent years. He offers an view of contemporary science which no longer portrays a deadening, disenchanted world, but re-enchants our world through disclosing bizarre, surprising and counter-intuitive facets to the brain. Sarah Perry spoke about the writing fiction as ‘an act of worship’ and ‘devotion’, of ‘adoration, of wonder, of almost disbelief and of pain, very frequently, of frustration – but there are moments when you perceive something out of the corner of your eye’ and ‘suddenly it blooms vividly and really in front of you’. She went on to state that she finds writing ‘as extraordinary as any other faith experience’.

This event thus disclosed an understanding of faith and belief which showed that, although they might be misappropriated and stultify experience, they also fundamentally undergird our perception of reality – keeping our wits warm to the things that are – however that might take shape in surprising and unexpected forms at the current time.



Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Feb 18 2015

Leadership for the Post-secular Age

Comments Off on Leadership for the Post-secular Age


On Wednesday 24th February we welcomed Dr Georgette Bennett to the LSE Faith Centre, to speak on the theme of Leadership for the Post-secular Age. You can read articles by Georgette Bennett here and her role in founding the Tanenbaum Foundation here. She also started the Multifaith Alliance for Syrian Refugees, an interfaith response to the Syrian refugee crisis.

DSC_0389This event was a wonderful occasion. Georgette Bennett highlighted the severity of our current global situation regarding religion-related violence, but – crucially – she provided many heartwarming examples of constructive responses to these problems; desirable examples of Leadership for the Post-secular Age, like that LSE Faith Centre seeks to encourage and foster.

A podcast of the event is available here:

Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Feb 2 2015

Is Inequality Sinful?

Comments Off on Is Inequality Sinful?
Barbara Ridpath - Headshot (web)

Barbara Ridpath, Director of the St Paul’s Institute

On Friday 23rd January, the LSE Faith Centre hosted the webstreaming of a conference held in Trinity Church on New York’s Wall Street, entitled ‘Creating Common Good’. Here, the Director of the St Paul’s Institute, one of the collaborating organisations, offers some reflections on the day’s proceedings. 

Last Friday at a seminar at Trinity Wall Street in New York entitled Creating Common Good [1] (simulcast in part at the London School of Economics in a collaboration between St Mary-Le-Bow, JustShare, St Paul’s Institute and the LSE Faith Centre) the Archbishop of Canterbury spoke on the topic Is Inequality Sinful? His arguments were largely about economic inequality but taken to their logical limit, Archbishop Justin issued a real challenge to the Church, particularly within days of the consecration of the first woman bishop in the Church of England. Which kinds of inequality should concern us? Is that inequality of opportunity or inequality of outcome? Does it apply only to economic inequality, dealing with the traditional biblical issue of the rich and poor, or is it wider and broader dealing also with the poor in spirit?

On Monday of the same week, Jean Vanier, founder of L’Arche, spoke in the House of Lords about why the strong need the weak.[2] His views emphasize the need to consider equality in terms of strength and spirit, access and voice of the differently able, the weak and the strong. And what about equality of gender and sexuality; how are we to deal with these issues? How equal are women in today’s society? And what about members of the LGBTI community, who have done far better in society as a whole than they have in the established church, but still have a long way to go to feel they are equally treated in society?

It is telling that the Archbishop’s homily at the service preceding the conference at Trinity Wall Street, was considerably more explicit than his remarks at the conference. ‘[Jesus] does not permit us to accept a society in which the weak are excluded (whether because of race, wealth, gender, ability, or sexuality),’ [3] he said.  In his talk at the conference he demonstrated numerous Biblical references to the idea ‘We are all equal’ under creation and in the eyes of God. ‘Inequality contrasts with the basic equality before God,’ he told us.


A highlight of the day was Canon Mark Oakley asking a question to the panel in New York via Skype, all the way from the 8th Floor of the New Academic Building

We need to treat each other as equals and work for equality for all because of the Biblical imperative, but there are other reasons as well. We need to know and love and celebrate those who are different from ourselves. That is what makes for both community and understanding. We need to accept and celebrate the gift of our differences as God given, and because they are what makes us human; what makes us ‘us.’

Paradoxically, the Church struggles with these issues as much or more than society as a whole. In this, all of us, including the Church, need to recognize our failings, our weaknesses and our imperfections as also part of what makes us part of the human family. We need to recognize, but not to accept them as an excuse for doing nothing. In spite of our weaknesses and our failings, we must listen for understanding on how we can all foster equality for all.

Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Jan 5 2015

Craig Calhoun on a Postsecular Future

Comments Off on Craig Calhoun on a Postsecular Future

LSE Director Professor Craig Calhoun speaks on a number of short videos uploaded on the William Temple Foundation Youtube channel, in which he discusses various aspects of faith, postsecularity and contemporary society. These are well worth a watch to wet your appetite for the coming year of activities in the LSE Faith Centre!


For more information on the William Temple Foundation click here, and for a reminder of Prof. Calhoun’s contribution to the Faith Centre opening event click here.

Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Dec 16 2014

Interfaith Week: How I learned to go with the flow

Comments Off on Interfaith Week: How I learned to go with the flow

Mary Leong partaking in a traditional Vancouverite activity: yoga in the ocean

The LSE Student’s Union organised a variety of events in and around the Faith Centre for Interfaith Week 2015. The SU Communications Officer Mary Leong shares her experiences of meditation here, where she found herself pleasantly surprised after a Meditation Session in The Cave – a space within the Faith Centre designed for students to use for contemplation, reflection and meditation


There’s an awful lot about religion in the news and it’s not always positive. The protracted Israel-Palestine conflict, massacre of Rohingya Muslims in Burma, persecution of Uyghurs and Christians in China, increased conflation of religion and state power in many countries – the list goes on.

While root causes can’t be reduced solely to religion, it continues to play a large role in states’ justification of violence and conflict.


LSE’s Interfaith Week was a chance for students of all faiths (or none) to engage about religion, culture, and spirituality in an open, inclusive, and non-intimidating forum. I was sent to participate in a meditation session, and hopefully, learn something in the process…

Meditation, I scoffed. As a former sales assistant in an aromatherapy store, I had encountered my fair share of customers trying to tell me about my chakras. That was about the extent to which my relationship with zen had progressed over the years. I didn’t purposefully shy away from the spiritual, but didn’t see – or make – room for it in my life.

Part of my reluctance to engage was discomfort with the way “trendy” New Age practices have evolved and divorced with their historical, cultural, and spiritual significance. In Vancouver, where I’m from, there are (very expensive!) yoga studios and juice bars on every street corner. Wellness and spirituality have become commodities that signify a certain – mostly white, upper-middle class – aspirational lifestyle, and frankly I just wasn’t keen to participate in it.

On a personal level, the idea of taking time out to be alone with my thoughts was a little frightening. I had no idea what to expect when I arrived in the Cave, a dimly-lit room in the Faith Centre adorned by rope-knit beanbag seats and candles. In the back of my mind, a niggling thought remained: What if I’m doing it wrong? Can you even do meditation wrong? 


My fears turned out to be, thankfully, unfounded. I was pleasantly surprised when the session largely featured breathing and visualization exercises, both of which I was quite familiar with, thanks to ongoing efforts to cope with anxiety through those methods. I was also heartened when the session ended with a series of readings from Sufism, Buddhism, and Kabbalah on the importance of mindfulness and interpersonal relationships.

Now, I’m not saying that meditation is going to become a major part of my life from here on. I certainly didn’t transcend to some higher mental state or have some sort of spiritual awakening, but the idea of just taking time out to find some inner peace and quiet doesn’t intimidate me as much any more.

For all my scepticism, Interfaith Week provided a gateway for me (and hopefully other students) to open up to new ideas and experiences. I’m glad that it pushed me to do something outside my comfort zone that challenged me and my assumptions.


Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Dec 9 2014

Mutually Supportive Connectedness on the Interfaith Buddies Scheme

Comments Off on Mutually Supportive Connectedness on the Interfaith Buddies Scheme

Catherine Whittle

This term saw the pilot run of the new Interfaith Buddies scheme, fostering constructive encounters and engagements between LSE students of different faiths and belief systems in the context of small discussion groups. Here, Anthropology and Law student Catherine Whittle shares some experiences and reflections on the scheme, and highlights the importance of staying interconnected, especially when it comes to offering mutual support in challenging times. 

Huddled by my Advent candle on this chilly December evening, I’m enjoying the novelty of having just posted a Facebook poll asking a Catholic, an agnostic, a Muslim and a Buddhist when they’re all free for our Christmas dinner. Can’t say I saw that coming.

Frankly I’d be hard pushed to think of four lectures I’ve been to that were as enlightening and intellectually stimulating as the four hours I’ve spent with my Interfaith Buddies group. I’ll share a few highlights that educated me:


–          I tentatively asked my new Catholic friend if Catholics pray to Mary and not directly to God. From my evangelical/Baptist background, praying to Mary is not the done thing, and a distant memory from my childhood of hearing my Catholic grandmother open a prayer with ‘Hail Mary’ had roused my curiosity. Her emphatic response: “No, we have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.” I could have cheered and applauded. It seems the ‘personal relationship’ is not the exclusive domain of Protestantism; thank goodness. Actually, the idea of encouraging children to pray to Mary as a more approachable, maternal figure doesn’t seem like the worst idea.

–          The lesser jihad, a holy war to resist those oppressing the Islamic community, is not so significant as the greater jihad: the war raging within yourself against darkness and temptation, the fight to choose the right path. And regardless, I am told, the lesser jihad in no way justifies the actions of the so-called Islamic State, at least in the view of many Muslims. (I wondered if this would come up. None of us mentioned it until our Muslim member broached the subject.) Further, within Islam even smiling at someone is an act of charity. I like this logic under which those without financial means can also be charitable. It taps into my understanding that generosity is more about spirit and relationship than finance.

–          Buddhist meditation is about understanding our emotions, being at one with them and exercising control that we might not be overcome by them. This practice means that any event of life is not too much for us, however difficult; there is more to our existence and we need not be overwhelmed. Secondly, a prominent Thai festival involves dedicating a day to throw water over anyone and everyone you happen to come across as an act of sharing blessing and good fortune. Really, anyone. The government have told those who don’t want to get wet to stay at home. Can you imagine the influx of common assault charges if we tried the same thing here?

–          Burning paper representations of gifts for late relatives and ancestors is still practiced in China, though perhaps not so commonly as in times gone by. Some of us expected this having seen the odd (commonly ethnocentric) documentary, but we didn’t realise that the paper gifts burned for the dead can include servants, or that these gifts can be intriguingly labelled, ‘Made in Hell’. I also heard my first stories of people seeing the ghosts of their recently deceased relatives, which as an Anthropology student is quite exciting. I am challenged to consider how far my theology can stretch to accommodate a diversity of human experience, and where the boundaries lie between faith, reason, tradition and culture.

Possibly the seminal moment of my Interfaith Buddies experience for me, however, has been the human connection of our group, diverse as we are, getting to know each other. One member of our group is facing a difficult time at the moment with her mother being very ill. Recently her mum underwent a serious operation, and through our Facebook group she asked us all to “pray/meditate/wish a lot…” for her mum. If I could crystallise Interfaith Buddies into a moment, it would be this. Five people from with very different histories, and often contrasting beliefs, remembering and supporting one another in any way we know how – we petition our God, a higher power, the Universe; we hope, in the interests of another. And so this other becomes less ‘Other’ and more ‘Person’, like me, who needs support, like me.

LSE’s Interfaith Buddies programme is similar to a programme run by St Ethelburga’s Centre for Reconciliation and Peace, whose mission is to “help people build relationships across divisions of conflict, culture and religion”. I have felt peace and reconciliation within our group. I might even go as far as saying that our meetings have given me hope that our world could one day find peace and reconciliation. That, from my faith perspective, humanity and the rest of creation could live in the ‘shalom’ (wholeness, peace) of God that I seek for myself and often struggle to extend to others. I regret that I have not always seen past my own prejudice or ignorance. I hope we may over time rediscover our true humanity, a humanity that is always shared. And above all, I am thankful for the opportunity I have had to outgrow my preconceptions, to learn from others and to consider how much we have in common. There is much about which we agree.

“Life is never about being correct, but only and always about being connected. Just stay connected! At all costs stay connected. Our only holiness is by participation and surrender to the Body of Love, and not by any private performance. This is the joining of hands from generation to generation that can still change the world—and will. Because Love is One, and this Love is either shared and passed on or it is not the Great Love at all.”– Richard Rohr’s Meditation: The Eternal Home of Love. Centre for Action and Contemplation

Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Nov 4 2014

Planting the seeds of wisdom at the Faith Centre official opening

Comments Off on Planting the seeds of wisdom at the Faith Centre official opening

s200_jacob phillips (1) (2)The official opening of the LSE Faith Centre featured a dialogue between former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Williams of Oystermouth, and renowned sociologist Prof. Bruno Latour, chaired by the LSE Director Prof. Craig Calhoun, on the theme of Religion and the Environment. In this post the Faith Centre Coordinator Jacob Phillips highlights the resonances between some of the themes of this discussion and the work of the LSE Faith Centre itself. 

The official opening of the LSE Faith Centre featured a discussion between Rowan Williams and Bruno Latour on  religion and the environment, chaired by the LSE Director Craig Calhoun. At first glance, this could seem a little incongruent; the apparently disparate themes of religion and ecology being hotly debated in a centre for religious observance and interfaith encounter in an institution which specialises in economics. However, these factors connected and intertwined in a remarkable fashion throughout the discussion, making this event a very fitting one to mark the opening of the Centre.  The Faith Centre is a place to explore one’s own tradition and encounter other traditions, to have ungrounded fears and presuppositions challenged, and to experience new insights and realisations, and uncover unseen aspects of one’s own standpoint. Throughout the dialogue between Williams and Latour, these aspects to the work of the LSE Faith Centre recurred frequently, as both thinkers approached religion and the environment in terms of challenging presuppositions, bringing fresh clarity and realisation to our approaches, and uncovering implicit or hidden aspects of religion as a resource for meeting the challenges of the impending ecological crisis. In short, many of the virtues required as a response to the ecological crisis, are related to aspects of the work of the Faith Centre itself. Continue reading

Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips

Oct 31 2014

Making our LSE community one that exports peace

Comments Off on Making our LSE community one that exports peace



Community and Welfare Officer and Alumnus Seb Bruhn attended We are All Human at the LSE Faith Centre, and records his impressions in this post. He concludes that if we can be more open to sincerely respecting and trying to relate to the struggles of people from other backgrounds, then we will perhaps get both a more truthful and holistic understanding of the global situation. 

A couple of weeks ago I was fortunate enough to attend ‘We are all human: Interfaith Perspectives on Troubled Times’. It was a fascinating panel event hosted by the LSE Faith Centre, with speakers Mustafa Field from the Faiths Forum for London and Sister Christine Frost, both renowned for their work on community cohesion. This event and its message, which was largely a response to recent incidents, resonated deeply with me, compelling me to write this blog that you are now reading. Its encouragement of organic interfaith dialogue and inclusion of anecdotes helped to remind me of the acute importance of mutual understanding and maintaining hope in these volatile and ever changing times.  Continue reading

Posted by: Posted on by Jacob Phillips