Impact of Social Sciences
Maximizing the impact of academic research
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About the project
    • About the blog
    • Our blog family
    • Blog Contributors
    • How to cite our blogs
  • Conference
    • Conference schedule
    • Breakout sessions
    • Visualisations of our research
  • Survey
    • Survey for academics
    • Survey for research users
  • The Handbook
    • Executive Summary
    • Introduction: Defining Research Impacts
    • 1: What shapes the citing of academic publications
    • 2: Using citation tracking systems
    • 3: Key Measures of Academic Influence
    • 4: Getting Better Cited
    • 5: Patterns of external research impacts
    • 6: Is there an impacts gap?
    • 7: How researchers achieve external impacts
    • 8: Organisational impacts
    • 9: Expanding external research impacts
    • Bibliography
    • Links
      • RISE
      • METRIS: country reports
      • Other Links
    • Annex 1: Impacts Project Database
  • Twitter Guide
  • Resources
  • Popular Posts
  • REF 2014
← Unclear REF provisions stand to punish academics who take brief maternity leaves. Researchers should be allowed to submit a reduced number of outputs in line for each period of leave taken.
The recent debate over the 50p tax rate illustrates that academic debates conducted through newspaper letters pages are rarely productive. Economists have an obligation to provide serious evidence for their claims. →

Sep 13 2011

Chosen academics to broadcast their research on BBC Radio 3

Posted on September 13, 2011 by Blog Admin
Share

A group of academics chosen as ‘New Generation Thinkers’ in a recent BBC competition will begin to air their research on Night Waves, a BBC 3 radio show from Wednesday night. The winners, who include LSE’s Dr Jon Adams, will broadcast on the station’s flagship arts and ideas programme following a competitive application and audition process which saw the BBC and AHRC whittle down the applicants from 1060 to a final 10.

Five-minute presentations by each academic on their research topics have already been broadcast on air and some of the final ten will be invited to develop longer pieces for the radio show. Radio 3’s Head of Speech, Matthew Dodd, told the THE that the ambitions underlying the competition were quite humble; programme makers were simply looking to unearth more academic contributors.

“Public communication [in academia] is becoming valued and cherished in a way it was not before”, said Zoe Norridge, a lecturer in modern and contemporary literature at the University of York. She believes that views of public engagement are partly changing because of the increased focus on impact and said that she was attacted to the competition by the opportunity to use the “intimacy” of radio to “communicate complex ideas in terms somebody washing up on a Wednesday evening can grasp and that make them want to hear more.”

David Petts, lecturer in archaeology at Durham University, said that he was, in part, motivated to enter the competition by the impact agenda, although he recognised that it would be difficult to measure the impact of increasing the public’s historical understanding through his broadcasts.

“The BBC can tell us listener numbers, but were they tuning into listen to me or to Arianna Huffington?”

Academics also have a role in making people “stop and think about the world they are in”, urged Philip Roscoe, lecturer in management at the University of St Andrews. “It is liberating that we are able to do this kind of thing and potentially gain house points for doing it successfully,” he added.

The AHRC has responded to the unexpected volume of applicants by organizing eight day-long workshops in broadcast media for those interested in improving their broadcast skills. While the AHRC and BBC hope to run the competition again next year, Jake Gilmore, AHRC communications manager, is optimistic that other research councils will consider running similar schemes aimed at academics across other disciplines.

A more detailed article, ‘Turn on, tune in and make waves’, was originally printed in the THE on Thursday, 8th September.

Read Dr Jon Adams on how to measure thoughts and thinkers, and the need for universities to preserve disciplinary autonomy in the face of impact assessments.

Print Friendly
Share

Related posts:

  1. Generation Think: the role that precise criteria plays in judging the allocation of research funding and in choosing our ‘bright young things’
  2. The AHRC funding debate must now focus on what is really important: ensuring that academics retain the freedom to research for the good of society, and acknowledging the vast improvement that research councils have made in the last few years
  3. Academics must realise the value in working with think tanks and pressure groups that can re-package their research for a wider audience
  4. Share your Twitter top tips for a new ‘how-to’ guide for academics on the merits of academic tweeting
  5. Academics and universities should embrace blogging as a vital tool of academic communication and impact
This entry was posted in Academic communication, News and tagged Academic communication, BBC New Generation Thinkers, impact, Jon Adams, public engagement. Bookmark the permalink.
← Unclear REF provisions stand to punish academics who take brief maternity leaves. Researchers should be allowed to submit a reduced number of outputs in line for each period of leave taken.
The recent debate over the 50p tax rate illustrates that academic debates conducted through newspaper letters pages are rarely productive. Economists have an obligation to provide serious evidence for their claims. →
  • RSS Feed Twitter Facebook
  • Tweets by @LSEImpactBlog
  • Recent Posts

    • Formal academic conferences and informal blogging play complementary roles in the academic feedback cycle
    • Impact factors declared unfit for duty
    • Investing in higher education, including the social sciences, would promote growth in Britain
    • 5 minutes with Kathryn King from The Policy Press: “Digital publishing gives us the opportunity to offer content in ways impossible in print”
    • Academia.edu releases embedded data-sets and code
  • Guide to using Twitter in university research, teaching, and impact activities

     Guide to using Twitter in university research, teaching, and impact activities
  • Podcasts on measuring your impact, the REF, and academic communication

    LIsten to podcasts
  • Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists

    Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists
  • Subscribe by email

  • Categories

    • Academic communication
    • Academic Inspiration
    • Academic Publishing
    • Book Reviews
    • Citations
    • Elsevier Boycott
    • Essential 'how-to' Guides
    • Events
    • Evidence-based Policy
    • Evidence-based Research
    • Five minutes with…
    • Government
    • Higher Education
    • Impact
    • Impact Conference 2011
    • Impact Conference 2012
    • Knowledge Transfer
    • News
    • Open Access
    • Rankings
    • REF 2014
    • Research Ethics
    • Research funding
    • Research to Policy Event
    • Social Media
    • Top 5
    • Uncategorized
  • RSS THE News

  • Archives

  • LSE Review of Books Visit our sister blog: LSE Review of Books
  • LSE EUROPP blog Visit our sister blog: LSE EUROPP blog
  • LSE British Politics and Policy blog Visit our sister blog: LSE British Politics and Policy blog
  • Impact of Social Sciences blog Go home: the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog
© 2013 Impact of Social Sciences