Britain imports a lot of dairy produce, nearly all of it from the EU, while at home, the industry employs a large number of workers from the rest of the EU. Jan Bakker and Nikhil Datta predict that dairy will become more expensive after Brexit. Even if Britons switch to UK-produced dairy, it will take some years for domestic herds to meet demand.
While there still is large uncertainty about the new trading regime between the EU and the UK, businesses on both sides of the channel are trying to prepare for the new trading environment and the wider implications of the government’s Brexit policy. The extent to which different industries are affected by these policy changes varies widely, depending on the intensity with which they are trading with the EU and how much they will be affected by rising trade costs such as regulatory divergence.
In a recent report for LSE Consulting, we study the effect of Brexit on the UK dairy industry along three key dimensions: increasing trade costs, changes in the labour market and changes in final demand.
The UK relies heavily on imports to satisfy consumer demand for dairy products. It has a net dairy trade deficit of more than £1.5 billion, the second largest in the world (China has the biggest). Additionally, 98% of the UK’s dairy imports come from the EU. Thus, any changes in trade costs between the UK and EU will have important effects on the UK consumer as the price of imported goods will increase.
Brexit will invariably result in an increase in trade costs for UK-EU trade; however, there is significant uncertainty surrounding the size of this rise. Studies attempting to project the economic impact of Brexit often assume trade cost increases to be constant across sectors. We take a closer look at different components of post-Brexit trade costs which are likely to be specifically important for the dairy industry, such as customs declarations, rules of origin costs (RoO), animal and food-specific regulations, and imposed check times and port traffic.
Assuming the UK does not have a customs agreement with the EU once it leaves, UK-EU trade will require customs declarations, as is required for UK trade with the rest of the world. Customs declarations are usually made by companies using either an internal digital system or through logistics providers. Fees by providers can go beyond £25 per sea container and this provides a useful benchmark for the involved administrative cost. The ability to easily create customs declarations will rely on the smooth functioning of the Customs Declaration Service (CDS). This new system was designed prior to the Brexit vote and as it stands will only be capable of handling up to 150 million custom declarations a year once active, much less than the 250 million declarations a year the HMRC estimates post-Brexit. Expecting the CDS to run at over 160% capacity could lead to an unstable system which may result in additional waiting times. This compounded with the fact that approximately 130,000 new traders will be required to fill out declarations for the first time, make the prospect of a lack of customs arrangement a concern.
As long as the UK is a member of the European Union, goods can move seamlessly through UK ports, going to or coming from the EU. Outside of the Customs Union this will no longer be the case and customs inspection will take place, which will add to waiting times at border points. Recent research from Imperial College London has estimated the impact of vehicle checks onto the peak-time traffic queue. Using their results, we calculate that an extra seven minutes of check times per vehicle at Dover would imply at least £111 per container increase in transportation labour costs alone at the current wage rate. When one considers the loss of perishable goods, lorry maintenance and general equilibrium effects (all importers and exporters will require more HGV driver time, pushing up wages) this will likely increase. Currently the average check time at the border for goods traded with non-EU countries stands at 20 minutes.
Without a customs arrangement, the dairy sector will be particularly affected by potential border checks as its products are classified as products of animal origin (POAO) which undergo additional controls at border checkpoints. For example, veterinary control checks incur costs of £50.60 per 6 tonne consignment and an additional cost of £45 per consignment for organic certification. The British Veterinary Association has estimated that there will be a 325% increase in the demand for vet checks at the border and importantly, almost half of the newly registered vets in 2016 were non-UK EU graduates. The latter of these two issues points to some first signs of exposure of the dairy industry to migration restrictions. These two forces, increasing labour demand and reducing supply, will invariably result in either increased vet check prices, or, as all POAO shipment must go through these checks, longer waiting times at the border.
Overall, any trade regime that does not involve truly frictionless trade, such as a customs union, is likely to result in increasing prices for dairy products in the short-run. In the long run, these price increases might lead to an expansion of the local dairy industry. However, the time lag is likely to be significant as increasing the size of livestock herds through reproduction can take a number of years. Furthermore, it will involve risky investment on behalf of farmers who face great uncertainty about what the relationship with the EU will be following Brexit day. The expansion of the local dairy industry will also not be able to make up for the loss of variety that makes up a crucial part of the gains from trade. The dairy industry serves as a perfect example for this, as there are certain varieties that must be imported and cannot be produced domestically, such as Danish blue cheese or French brie.
As hinted at above, Brexit will also affect the UK dairy industry through its impact on the labour market. Currently migrants from the EU, and especially the new member states, are an important part of the workforce in the agricultural industry. This is especially the case in food and drink manufacturing where 30% of the workforce are originally from the EU, compared to 6% of overall employment. Despite this reliance on migration, we find that on average the dairy sector is unlikely to experience upward wage pressure in the aggregate. The upward wage pressure from reduced migration is likely to be outweighed by reductions in labour demand due to reduced growth in economic activity due to Brexit, as projected by the Centre for Economic Performance, the National Institute for Economic Research and others.
Nevertheless, more than one third of businesses in the food and drink industry indicated that their business would become unviable if they lost access to (non-UK) EU nationals, indicating that there is likely to be upward pressure on wages and labour shortages for certain occupations. As well as vets, we find HGV drivers is an important exposed occupation for the dairy industry. Labour force data suggests HGV drivers already experienced a rise in nominal wages of around 10% since the referendum. This is in line with reports from industry insiders indicating difficulties in hiring lorry drivers as the sterling depreciation reduced European driver’s real wages in their home currency.
Overall, we find that in the absence of frictionless trade and appropriate government policy to address skill shortages, Brexit is likely to have a negative effect on consumers through higher prices for dairy products. This pinch will be exacerbated by the fact that Brexit-related inflationary pressures and uncertainty have already cost the average household approximately £1,270 – and projections suggest that post-Brexit, increasing trade costs could result in further losses.
Please read our comments policy before commenting.
Note: This article originally appeared at our sister site, LSE Brexit. It gives the views of the authors, not the position of EUROPP – European Politics and Policy or the London School of Economics.
_________________________________
Jan Bakker – University of Oxford
Jan Bakker is a DPhil student at the University of Oxford and a research assistant at the LSE Centre for Economic Performance. His research spans international trade, economic geography and labour economics.
Nikhil Datta – University College London
Nikhil Datta is a PhD candidate at University College London and a research assistant at the CEP. His research interests include labour economics and international trade.
But immigration from non eu countries is at an all time high – dont they work??
Why is there no mention to the hit on Irish, French, Italian, Danish & Spanish farmers not to mention Dutch horticulture? UK farmers are increasingly adapting to the use of vast polytunnels. Irish livestock farmers have had to go cap in hand to the UK for silage just to survive a winter cold snap & now again because of a dry spell. supplies via Junckers new Ireland/EU silk road will see livestock dying in the fields. You also fail to mention the UK can unilaterally decide not to apply tariffs on any imports of produce not available from the UK which it clearly will do. You also fail to mention the countries knocking down doors to sell their farm produce to the UK & world spot prices without tariffs are cheaper than CAP subsidised EU produce.
And I predict that all Executives, Directors, Managers, Politicians AND those at the LSE will also suffer from Brexit and see their salaries decrease by a minimum of 20%!
There is so much negative news following Brexit that not every one report, comment or opinion can be right!
Is there nothing to be positive about when the UK returns to ‘independence’?
Too many people have their heads stuck in a ‘gloomy cloud’ with little or no confidence either in Britain, its businesses or in fact themselves!
2 World wars were fought against the odds and Britain recovered from those so what could be more serious than that? Brexit? Not on your life! It is just another problem to solve!
So do yourselves a favour, stop messing with predictions and get a life and do something which benefits the UK instead of putting out these stupid reports filled with so much negativity!
I don’t say this to be rude, but really if we want to “solve the problem” of Brexit as you put it then your comment isn’t making much of a contribution. Like most Brexiteers, you seem to resent anyone who does any research that suggests things might be worse in a given sector after the UK leaves the EU (to the point of implying everyone who produces such research must be speaking on behalf of vested interests – hence the irrelevant jibe in the first sentence of your response).
If you were actually interested in “solving the problem of Brexit” you would be welcoming research that identifies the various issues that Brexit poses for the country. Part of solving a problem is identifying what it is, yet whenever anybody does that in the current climate they simply get abuse for not being “positive enough”. The researchers who produced this article are helping the process by identifying issues that the government can address. You hurling abuse at them because you don’t like the conclusion isn’t doing anything to help anyone.
Brexit has already resulted in higher food costs (caused primarily by the drop in the pound). That isn’t a prediction, it’s already happened over the last two years. It’s also not a bold prediction to suggest the situation will be made worse if there’s a no deal Brexit. There are potentially constructive actions the UK government could take to address that problem (now and in the future). We’re never going to get those solutions if people like you keep obsessively attacking anyone who flags up the problem.