LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

The Field Research Method Lab is an initiative that aims to bring together both established and early career researchers in order to share their hands-on fieldwork experiences. It is an online platform for researchers to appraise various constraints that they have encountered in the field and reflect upon how they have successfully or unsuccessfully addressed those constraints.

Despite the fact that ways of addressing constraints in the field often determine the quality of research findings and their validity, they have not been given enough space or opportunities for debates in academic works. Rich details of field research are often buried in individual researchers’ private domain such as research journals. At best, they remain between lines in academic texts without a chance to be fully disseminated.

The Field Research Method Lab, however, does not purpose to offer any “model” approaches or “best practices.” A seemingly effective or successful method in some aspects may still be subject to controversy in other views and contexts since neither the ways we relate with our field nor the logics we apply for analysis can ever be exempt from epistemological, ontological or ethical scrutinies. The underlying complexity of methodological discourses is no less significant than the reality of our field.

In this context, this online platform introduces diverse strategies adopted by field researchers, facilitating critical yet constructive debates and responses. Each contributor is to reflect upon their past or present field research projects and draw meaningful lessons in both practical and academic terms. Wherever possible, each posting accompanies a research outline as well as details of research outcomes so that viewers can better understand how the researcher’s experiences in the field have fed into their final research outputs.

Contributions to this blog are currently built around, but not limited to, the themes below:

  1. Practicalities associated with field research: field access; collaboration with local partners; language barriers, including dependence on translators
  2. Constraints on data collection: sampling; access to government sources; credibility and contamination of field data
  3. Relationship between the researcher and the researched: researcher’s positionality; power relations; insider-outsider dichotomy; boundary crossing
  4. Constraints on international collaboration
  5. Cultural encounters
  6. Government censorship and data access
  7. Research ethics

It is the aim of the Field Research Method Lab to expand its coverage and develop further discourses. The Field Research Method Lab welcomes new contributions from any researchers who wish to share their invaluable field experiences as well as responses to existing postings. Please e-mail either Dr Lee Mager, the blog’s editorial manager ( with your ideas including a short abstract and brief biography.

From 2019, the Field Research Method Lab blog is supported by the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.

About the Editor

Hyun Bang Shin is Professor in Geography and Urban Studies at the Department of Geography and Environment and the Director of the Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science. His research includes the critical analysis of the political economic dynamics of urban (re-)development and covers Asian urbanisation, speculative urbanism, displacement and gentrification, the right to the city, and mega-events as urban spectacles. His main areas of field research include Seoul, Beijing and Guangzhou among others.

More details of his current research are available on his personal webpage at Twitter: @urbancommune

About the Editorial Manager

Lee Mager is the Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre Manager. Dr Mager is a specialist in higher education management with particular expertise in the university student experience, and is an APMG certified Change Management Practitioner. Dr Mager holds a PhD and MSc in Sociology from LSE. His PhD examined the communicative construction of problem/solution discourses among online conspiracy theory communities, anchored in Alberto Melucci’s collective action conceptual framework, to address the question of whether conspiracy theory is an inherently disabling interpretation of power.

Comments policy: This blog welcomes feedback and comments in accordance with certain guidelines

Creative Commons: Unless otherwise specified, all of our articles are published under a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0). This means that you are free to republish them unmodified and properly attributed, preferably with a link to the original article. Please take care with imagery, however, as items may occasionally remain under copyright.

Disclaimer: The views expressed on the LSE Field Research Method Lab blog are those of the authors alone. They do not reflect the position of the LSE Field Research Method Lab, nor that of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion: LSE is committed to building a diverse, equitable and truly inclusive university. LSE believes that diversity is critical to maintaining excellence in all of our endeavours.