seckerj

About Jane Secker

Digital Literacy and Copyright Advisor at LSE's Centre for Learning Technology

Brush up your digital literacy skills with CLT

We’ve just re-branded our E-literacy for E-learning classes aimed at LSE staff and PhD students as the Digital Literacy Programme and added a few new classes to the schedule for later in November. Classes such as ‘Going Beyond Google’ and ‘Keeping up to date’ are still on offer, but look out for some new classes focusing on managing website using delicious and using wikis and other collaborative writing tools. For the full list of courses on offer in the coming month see the CLT courses and workshops page or the LSE Training Portal.

October 10th, 2008|Events & Workshops (LTI), Research Skills, Teaching & Learning|Comments Off on Brush up your digital literacy skills with CLT|

Lecture capture evaluation: report of the focus group

Methodology and design

A focus group was conducted in place of the survey that has previously been used to evaluate video lectures. A series of open ended questions were devised in order to gather opinions about student experiences of lecture capture including both video and audio lectures. This report includes student feedback, problems and issues and the value of recorded lectures as a learning aid.

Three students attended the focus group, so generalising about their experiences is difficult but their experience was varied and offered valuable insight. The first student recorded lectures himself with an audio recorder with permission from his lecturers. He said that the lectures were so inspirational that he wanted a recording to be able to listen to them again and again. A second student had access to recorded lecture material centrally provided by the Media and Communications department. The third student had access to both audio recordings (podcasts) and video lectures and could comment on the value of both types of recordings.

Value of Lecture capture

All three students commented on the value of recording lecture material. In particular they said it was extremely useful for revision. One student found recorded lectures very useful for a statistics course, commenting that they were especially useful for postgraduates who have to work and study at the same time. All students mentioned that recorded material was useful if you couldn’t attend a lecture or you want a recap, saying it’s “like having your lecturer with you any time you want”.

The students commented that were more likely to dip into certain parts of the lecture rather than watch the whole lecture again. This approach was particularly useful for revision but also really helpful for grasping a point they might initially not have understood. Students talked about how lectures could be extremely content rich or ‘dense’ and that the ability to go back and review the material really helped their learning.

Audio verses video

The student who had access to podcasts and video lectures commented that video lectures are much easier to follow than audio lectures. He said:

“Podcasts have the effect of nearly dosing off, you try to concentrate but all you see is the PowerPoint slides…because you lose the personal touch, you don’t see the face, you don’t see someone moving, interacting”.

Being able to see more than just PowerPoint slides was particularly valuable in economics courses for example, where the recordings are of limited value if you can’t see the graphs or additional notes the lecturer makes. However, one student felt that audio would be sufficient in his subject, which was not so reliant on visual material. Overall, in terms of retaining interest, the video lectures where the lecturer and the PowerPoint could be seen were preferred.

Access and Quality Issues

Students reported no real problems accessing video lectures both on and off campus. That said, later on in the focus group the students stated that the recorded lectures should be easier to find. They thought it would be helpful to have a podcast web page, perhaps under departmental headings or an archive of recordings. Another student commented that it was difficult to find the statistics lectures on the Methodology Institute website. In terms of navigation, the students did not report any problems with the format of the videos. One student felt it might be nice to divide the video into chapters, although he appreciated this would involve considerable post-production work.

In terms of quality, it was felt that the audio could be improved. The audio quality of public lectures in large theatres was noticeably better than some of the recordings from classrooms.

Value as a learning experience

One student commented that it was reassuring to know that certain lectures in statistics were being recorded, so they could go back and revisit the material. Another student found many of his lecturers inspirational and knowing there was a recording of the event allowed him to enjoy the lecture without having to take detailed notes. Again it was commented that being able to review the material for a second or even third time was valuable to ensure they grasped everything that was being said. The students felt this was especially good for students for whom English was not their first language.

The challenge of taking notes and listening to a lecture properly was mentioned by students, who felt it was “Humanly impossible to make notes in full” without listening again. This student felt you might miss around 35% of what was said during a lecture. They found it both reassuring to know the video lectures were available and extremely helpful for their revision. Students also commented that being able to listen to the lecture again often saved the students from needing to consult their lecturer with questions at a later date.

Lecture capture and attendance

The students were asked specifically about whether lecture capture affected attendance and certainly some of the students had friends who didn’t attend some lectures because they knew it would be available as a video lecture. Students tended to skip those subjects that were perceived as less interesting or more generic if they knew it was being recorded. However, in general the students we questioned talked about enjoying attending lectures and didn’t think the recordings had affected attendance overall. They reported that even if they didn’t attend a lecture they still needed to dedicate the time to listen to or watch the recording, so it was really easier for them to attend. As one student said:

“You need to go to the lecture to make it real, solidarity with your friends…you want to see the people, ask questions and see your friends asking questions.”

Future Developments

The students were keen to see all lectures at LSE recorded if possible and they also thought it would be useful to have access to recorded lectures after the course finished.

Students were asked specifically about whether they might be interested in listening or watching the lectures via mobile technology, such as on their mobile phone. Two of the group felt this might be useful, although they felt they were more likely to listen to public lectures and inspirational lectures on the bus, rather than material you needed to concentrate on in detail.

JS / SL

May 2008

June 5th, 2008|Reports & Papers|Comments Off on Lecture capture evaluation: report of the focus group|

Networked Learning conference

Roman carving from Museum of Archeology Thessaloniki

I’ve posted on the LASSIE blog about the recent Networked Learning Conference I attended at Sani Beach in Halkidiki, including thoughts from day one and day two. Some nice photos as well! I didn’t want to duplicate by putting it on this blog, but lots of useful stuff about e-portfolios, web 2.0 and the need to focus on teaching rather than technology.

May 14th, 2008|Conferences|Comments Off on Networked Learning conference|

Scanned readings: Lent Term deadline

Due to the demand for this service, please do try to get your Lent Term e-course pack requests to us by the end of this week. The official deadline was 31st October, but we are still accepting last minute requests. Please consult the guidelines for requesting e-packs for further details of what we need from you. Please send your completed lists to epacks@lse.ac.uk.

For queries about this service do get in touch with Jane, the Learning Technology Librarian. E-mail j.secker@lse.ac.uk. Feedback from this term has been highly positive, and well over 1500 scanned readings are now available to students through WebCT and Moodle.

November 5th, 2007|Announcements|Comments Off on Scanned readings: Lent Term deadline|

Please update links in reading lists to Lexis Professional

Lexis Professional has been replaced by Lexis Nexis Butterworths – access to Lexis Professional is likely to be withdrawn from academic institutions by the publishers before the start of term.

If you have a course in WebCT or Moodle, then any links to law reports, legislation or journal articles within Lexis Professional unfortunately will need to be updated.
It is possible to provide links direct to UK articles, law reports or legislation within Lexis Nexis Butterworths using the following linking tool: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/linkdirectplus

CLT have a web page with information on how to create stable links to online documents within many of our databases:
http://clt.lse.ac.uk/Online-Readings/E-journals/creating-stable-URLs.php

Please contact Jane Secker in CLT if you require assistance with updating links within your course. (ext. 6530 ; email: secker,j )

Access to LNB
On campus access URL to Lexis Nexis Butterworths is http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
Off campus (Athens) access URL to Lexis Nexis Butterworths is http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/athensredirection.do

August 31st, 2007|Announcements, Teaching & Learning|Comments Off on Please update links in reading lists to Lexis Professional|

Social Software and Libraries Literature review published

The literature review for the LASSIE (Libraries and Social Software in Education) project was published today on the LASSIE project blog. The report provides an overview of how social software is impacting on libraries, on issues relating to libraries supporting distance learners and on how the library operates as a social space.

July 18th, 2007|Blogging, Social Media|Comments Off on Social Software and Libraries Literature review published|

Citing and Referencing: video lecture now available

Knowing how to cite and reference properly is very important when you are preparing essays and other assignments. It’s also important to know how to cite properly in your dissertation. The Library and Centre for Learning Technology have made available a selection of online resources to help LSE students with this topic. Please visit:http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/insktr/citing_referencing.htm

A video lecture, a referencing best practice guide and further reading are available. This is a new initiative and if you have any feedback about the resources (particularly the video lecture) please do contact me.

June 18th, 2007|Social Media|1 Comment|

Electronic course pack service 2007-8

The electronic course pack service is available to all VLE users (WebCT or Moodle). This allows you to request small extracts of core readings which are scanned and made available to your students through their online course. If you wish to take advantage of this service the deadline for submissions for the Michaelmas Term is 31st July 2007. If you used the service last year you will be shortly getting a message from us about ‘renewing’ these readings and we will also be shortly sending you usage statistics of your current readings. Requests or queries about the service should be e-mailed to epacks@lse.ac.uk

Please note:
* You must have a course in the VLE (either WebCT or Moodle)
* Normally no more than 20 core readings can be included in a pack each term
* Extracts should be no more than 5% of work / one chapter from a book / one article from a journal issue
* Only readings NOT available in electronic format will be scanned – so please check the e-journal collections at LSE
* Readings should be covered by the CLA Scanning Licence which essentially means small extracts from UK publishers – we cannot guarantee being able to obtain copyright clearance for non-UK readings as these can be very expensive

New E-Pack User Guidelines available. If you wish to take advantage of the e-course pack service please read the notes for users before compiling a request. These are available at: http://clt.lse.ac.uk/Online-Readings/E-Course-Pack-User-Guidelines.php If you are interested in paper course pack services please visit the Course Pack One Stop Shop website: http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/tss/OSS/OSS.htm

June 8th, 2007|Announcements|Comments Off on Electronic course pack service 2007-8|

Learning On Screen conference

Marie and I attended the Learning on Screen: Copyright exceptions post Gowers / Taking Down Television II conference held this year as a one day event at the British Library. It was organised by the BUFVC. The copyright focus meant I attended rather than other colleagues in CLT and it also had useful updates on ERA+ Licence which Marie and I hoped would be useful for the MIDESS Project. The conference was opened by Lynne Brindley from the BL, and the morning focused on looking at the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property carried out last year by the Treasury. Various speakers reported on Gowers and what it meant to them including Toby Bainton from SCONUL, Andrew Yeates from ERA, Laurence Bebbington and Richard McCracken. The overall consensus was that Gowers very much was about striking a balance, but that fair dealing really doesn’t go far enough in allowing those in education to use copyrighted works in the way they would like to. There was also a sense that we could see many rights in copyright law being overriden by contract law. The OU in particularly felt that copyright laws tend to focsu too much on different media and the location of a person, rather than what their primary purpose was. So why shoudl distance learning or e-learning be any different to learning in a classroom? However, Gowers has certainly raised the profile of IPR so that can be no bad thing.

April 3rd, 2007|Conferences|1 Comment|

Launch of the Journal of Information Literacy

The Journal of Information Literacy was launched today and is edited by Sheila Webber from the University of Sheffield. Jane Secker from the LSE is the Deputy Editor.   

Volume 1, Issue 1 is now available from the Information Literacy website:

http://www.informationliteracy.org.uk/JIL.aspx 

JIL is an international, peer-reviewed, academic journal that aims to investigate Information Literacy (IL) within a wide range of settings.  Papers on any topic related to the practical, technological or philosophical issues raised by the attempt to increase information literacy throughout society are encouraged. JIL is published in electronic format only and is an open-access title.

The aim of JIL is to investigate and to make generalised observations on how Information Literacy impacts on organisations, systems and the individual.  While recognising the firm foothold already established by IL in the Higher Education sector, the editorial board, seeks to consolidate and extend this to a wider educational audience. Furthermore the board welcomes ever-wider interpretations of IL that extend its theoretical interpretation and practical use beyond the educational arena and across national frontiers.

January 31st, 2007|Uncategorized|Comments Off on Launch of the Journal of Information Literacy|