Share this:

Mario Moussa 80x108Derek Newberry 80x108Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has been one of the most unusual in US history, with the New York billionaire acting and commenting in a way that no presidential contenders have done in the past. And yet, even Trump’s juggernaut of a campaign found itself in the doldrums this spring after its poor showing in the Wisconsin primary vote. Mario Moussa and Derek Newberry write that in the wake of this crisis, the Trump campaign was able to revitalize itself via a major reboot which saw it hire new campaign experts and redirect its energies towards strategies which were ultimately successful.

Donald Trump has had some rough spots in his campaign. He damaged his credibility early on as a candidate by making a string of confusing and ill-advised statements about punishing women who have an abortion and expressing scant concern about nuclear proliferation. His campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, has been dogged by charges that he assaulted a Breitbart reporter in April. Even worse was the shellacking Trump took in the Wisconsin primary, losing by a shocking double-digit margin. Reports had said that with the “Make America Great Again” campaign was in evident disarray, Trump’s team of advisors were working on a “reboot.”

After years of studying collaboration at the Wharton School of Business, we concluded that the best performing teams reboot all the time. As situations change, they change. In other words, they reboot. We have no special insight into Trump’s nomination, but as teamwork experts, we do feel the candidate deserves credit on this key point.

Let’s look a little more closely at what the man who wrote the book on deal-making can teach us about the art of teamwork — and especially the reboot.

Trump launched his campaign with the clear goal of broadcasting his message directly to voters. He all but ignored the traditional retail activities such as meet-and-greets at churches and state fairs, rubber chicken dinners, and gatherings with local politicians. Delivering taunts, insults, and over-the-top promises at debates and large rallies generated what many observers have claimed is over a billion dollars of free PR. His new convention manager, Paul Manafort, said the campaign model was “predicated on a historic approach to communicating with the public.” But then, as the gaffes mounted, this shoot-from-the-hip approach stopped delivering easy victories by late March.  What to do?  That’s right: time to reboot, and redirect energies.

Reboot featured

Credit: nchenga (Flickr, CC-BY-NC-2.0)

Which Trump did – and fast. Because, even with an impending nomination, there are still obstacles ahead. Trump brought in Manafort, who has his own team of like-minded aides who will also join the campaign. Lewandowski has hired specialists who worked with former Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul and know how to win over delegates, one tough-talk conversation at a time.

Desperation moves?  Recent media coverage might lead you to that conclusion. We see a different perspective. The Trump campaign is like a team of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who raised money, launched a venture, recognized quickly that their business model was failing, and – to use a popular high-tech term – pivoted. Successful teams at Facebook, Slack, Pinterest, and many other companies had to pivot several times before they became winners. This is not easy to do for a startup or campaign team, and it often produces conflicts. Not surprisingly, Trump’s meetings with his staff have been reported as being highly contentious.

So, how to have a successful reboot? When we advise executives about managing their teams, we emphasize a few guidelines illustrated vividly by Trump’s latest public moves. Always work toward a goal but avoid becoming too attached to it, because situations change and you might have to adjust. Define and redefine roles on your team as your work evolves, and seek to put the right people in those roles.  Have frank discussions – which will often be contentious – about what they need to do. Be clear about how you want the members of your core team and related teams to work together. As General Stanley McChrystal puts it, leaders need a “team of teams” to run an organization. Above all, remember that it is really hard work to align and re-align a group of people collaborating on achieving a common purpose.

Because managing a successful pivot is such hard work, most teams fail to deliver hoped-for results. Yet at the moment, we think Trump’s campaign is increasing its chances of clinching electoral victory soon by rebooting. You might even consider doing it on your own team, if recent performance has been disappointing. Of course, in politics as in business, despite the promises of overconfident leaders, there are no simple solutions and no guarantees. But by following a few guidelines, you can give your team the best shot at achieving what Trump himself might call “yuge” success.

Please read our comments policy before commenting. 

Note:  This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of USApp– American Politics and Policy, nor of the London School of Economics.  

Shortened URL for this post:


About the authors

Mario Moussa 80x108Mario Moussa Wharton School of Business
Dr. Mario Moussa is a successful author, keynote speaker, and management consultant who teaches in the Executive Programs at the Wharton School of Business.


Derek Newberry 80x108Derek Newberry – Wharton School of Business
As a business anthropologist, Dr. Derek Newberry is an expert in the human factors that drive organizational effectiveness. Derek has worked with Fortune 500 firms, leading hospitals and major non-profits to design growth strategies that tap into employee motivation. At the Aresty Institute of Executive Education, he helps global executives develop strategic persuasion skills and manage high-performing teams. Derek is also a Lecturer at the Wharton School, where he teaches courses on group dynamics and corporate culture. He has published extensively and lectured internationally on cultural barriers to organizational change.