LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Peter Finn

June 28th, 2024

The 2024 Elections: The first presidential debate saw Joe Biden struggle against a restrained Donald Trump

0 comments | 2 shares

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Peter Finn

June 28th, 2024

The 2024 Elections: The first presidential debate saw Joe Biden struggle against a restrained Donald Trump

0 comments | 2 shares

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Last night President Joe Biden and former President Trump met in Atlanta for the first 2024 presidential election debate. Peter Finn writes that Biden’s lack of energy and difficulties articulating his points will feed into existing negative narratives about the incumbent president’s fitness for office, while Trump’s relatively restrained performance may persuade some swing voters. 

  • This article is part of ‘The 2024 Elections’ series curated by Peter Finn (Kingston University). Ahead of the 2024 election, this series is exploring US elections at the state and national level. If you are interested in contributing to the series, contact Peter Finn (p.finn@kingston.ac.uk).

In an unbroken tradition stretching back to the 1976 debate between Republican President Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter, the Democratic challenger who ultimately won the presidency in 1976, the evening of June 27th 2024 saw US President Joe Biden of the Democratic Party and former President Donald Trump of the Republican party face each other in a televised presidential debate shown on CNN. It was the first of two debates scheduled between the candidates, with the second one due to be aired by ABC on September 10. There are plans for a vice presidential debate to be held in either July or August, which Vice President Kamala Harris has accepted, but as of the time of writing, there is no-Trump vice-presidential nominee, nor had the invitation for a debate been accepted by the Trump campaign.

Though there are, as yet, no polls that take into account the candidates’ debate performances, and thus one should be wary about making any claims regarding the impact of the debate, there are some clear themes that are already beginning to take shape.

Firstly, the debate provided material for those wishing to portray Biden as unfit to deal with the rigors of being US president. At times he struggled to clearly articulate his answers, whilst at others he seemed to lack energy. As such, this debate will likely add to negative narratives related to Biden that have previously been teased out of a variety of sources such as a Special Counsel report into his handling of classified material.

In terms of Trump, he managed to put in a relatively restrained performance, shaving off, even if just for a single debate, some of the rougher edges of his persona. That said, and in a continuation of his previous form, made false claims (and it seems Biden also made some, though the former president appears to have made many more).

One restrained debate performance by Trump is, of course, unlikely to persuade those heavily entrenched within the Democratic Party. However, in a closely fought election, and especially if he manages to maintain such disciplined messaging (a big if!), it may persuade some of the much-vaunted swing voters who look poised to decide the presidential election in November. Another big question on the Trump side of the ledger is, of course, if his ongoing legal travails will make any significant dent in his support specifically, or the election in general.

In terms of overall takeaways, and with the above caveat that one should wait for more information before coming to any firm conclusions in mind, the debate appears likely to feed into pre-existing narratives about Biden, whilst those surrounding Trump are likely to be relieved that he managed to avoid stoking any significant controversies.


About the author

Peter Finn

Dr Peter Finn is a multi-award-winning Senior Lecturer in Politics at Kingston University. His research is focused on conceptualising the ways that the US and the UK attempt to embed impunity for violations of international law into their national security operations. He is also interested in US politics more generally, with a particular focus on presidential power and elections. He has, among other places, been featured in The Guardian, The Conversation, Open Democracy and Critical Military Studies.

Posted In: Elections and party politics across the US | The 2024 Elections

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LSE Review of Books Visit our sister blog: British Politics and Policy at LSE

RSS Latest LSE Events podcasts

This work by LSE USAPP blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported.