Labour must maintain a broad electoral coalition if it wishes to form a government. Its path to Downing Street goes through the Leave-voting Conservative marginals, writes Richard Johnson (Lancaster University). Winning the Conservative-held constituencies in England and Wales that voted for Brexit is a sine qua non for the formation of a Labour government, he argues.
Based on the results of the 2017 general election, the Labour Party is 64 seats short of an overall majority in Parliament. To win power, it will need roughly to double the number of net gains it made in the last general election (30). A majority of these gains will need to be in Leave-voting seats. Using Chris Hanretty’s excellent estimates of constituency-level voting in the 2016 referendum, I analyse key marginal constituencies to demonstrate the dominance of Leave-voting seats in a winning electoral strategy for Labour.
There are two important stipulations to this analysis. Of Labour’s 64 targets, 45 are seats in Leave-voting England and Wales, while 18 target seats are in Remain-voting Scotland. Due to the divergent nature of electoral politics in these two parts of Britain, they will be analysed distinctly. Secondly, we cannot say that the proportion of people who voted Leave in a constituency is reflected in the proportion of people who voted Labour in a constituency (ecological fallacy). Nonetheless, it is still important to understand the context of the electorates which Labour needs to gain.
Let us first look at Labour’s 45 target seats in England and Wales, all held by the Conservatives. Based on the Hanretty constituency estimates, I calculated that 78% of these constituencies voted Leave. While there are a handful of Remain-voting Tory seats which Labour must win, they are vastly outnumbered by Leave-voting constituencies (see Figure 1).
Among these seats, the intensity of Leave support also tends to be stronger in these seats than Remain support. There are 13 Tory-held Labour targets with Leave votes of more than 60% (Walsall North, Stoke South, Mansfield, Thurrock, Blackpool North, Telford, Middlesbrough South, Pendle, North East Derbyshire, Carlisle, Southampton Itchen, Northampton North, Corby). In contrast, there are there are only 3 Tory seats in which fewer than 40% of voters backed Leave which are plausible Labour targets (Finchley, Westminster, Putney). They are all in London.
Figure 1. Conservative-held seats targeted by Labour, sorted by 2016 referendum vote
In Scotland, Labour needs to gain 18 seats from the SNP. While some of these Scottish seats are very strongly Remain, others had a stronger Leave result than is generally understood. In Glasgow East, for example, with an SNP majority over Labour of only 75, 44% of voters are estimated to have voted Leave. Other target SNP seats for Labour recorded surprisingly strong Leave results, such as Na h-Eileanan an Iar (44% Leave), Glenthroes (48% Leave), and Linlithgow (42% Leave).
In some constituencies, Labour came unexpectedly close in the last general election, and a dedicated effort to win those seats is underway. For example, Labour was only a combined 135 votes short of gaining two more seats in Glasgow. Motherwell, Inverclyde, and Airdrie all have SNP majorities of under 500. It is worth noting that Labour gained all of its Scottish constituencies on a pro-Leave manifesto in 2017. More is going on in the Scottish case, with fatigue with SNP devolved rule and the independence question as additional factors.
While Labour should seek to win as many SNP seats as possible, I would argue that the Conservative-held constituencies in England and Wales are more important for the Labour Party. Winning these seats is a sine qua non for the formation of a Labour government. Labour might plausibly still form a government if it falls short of its target in Scotland, as the SNP are unlikely to give confidence to or form a coalition with the Conservatives. But, if Labour cannot gain Conservative seats in England and Wales, then it cannot govern, even as a minority.
The 64-seat hurdle, of course, assumes that Labour will not lose any constituencies which it currently holds. At the last election, in spite of gains elsewhere, Labour lost six constituencies to the Conservatives (Copeland, North East Derbyshire, Mansfield, Middlesbrough South, Stoke-on-Trent South, and Walsall North). All of these seats voted to leave the European Union. Labour was expected to lose many more constituencies which fit a similar profile, but it is plausible that the party’s manifesto commitment to Brexit stymied an even greater scale of losses in Leave constituencies.
Analysing Labour’s twenty-five most marginal constituencies (majorities under 2,000), there is a clear dominance of Leave-voting seats (Figure 2). Indeed, 72% of Labour’s most marginal constituencies voted Leave. In Scotland, Labour faces competition from the SNP in five Remain-voting seats, but in England and Wales, 80% of its vulnerable seats are in Leave-voting constituencies with the Conservatives in second place.
Outside of Scotland, hardly any of Labour’s MPs are vulnerable in Remain-voting constituencies. There is only one Labour-held seat vulnerable to the Tories which voted more than 60% Remain (Kensington), while there are seven Labour-held constituencies which voted more than 60% Leave which are vulnerable to the Conservatives (Dudley North, Ashfield, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Peterborough, Bishop Auckland, Penistone, and Crewe).
Figure 2. Most Vulnerable Labour-Held Constituencies, Ordered by Estimated Leave Vote
It might be thought that Labour can ‘afford’ to lose its Leave-voting seats by making up the difference elsewhere. But, seeking to win Remain-voting, Liberal Democratic seats does not offer Labour a path forward. There were twelve seats won by the Liberal Democrats in the last general election, but in none of them are Labour in second place. In every English Lib Dem constituency, the Conservatives are in second place; in every Scottish Lib Dem constituency, the SNP are in second place. There are no Welsh Lib Dem constituencies. Likewise, in none of Labour’s most marginal constituencies are the Lib Dems a second-place contender, meaning they pose little threat to incumbent Labour MPs.
Has there been a shift to Remain?
Some might object to this analysis on the presumption that there has been a dramatic shift to Remain since the 2016 election. There is, however, little empirical evidence of mass ‘Bregret’. Indeed, one of the most striking facts about British politics since the referendum is the reasonably consistent support for Leave and Remain.
While Remain has budged up slightly in the polls, the swing is relatively trivial and pales in comparison to other dramatic polling surges and falls we’ve seen in public opinion polling over the same period, including support for the political parties and party leadership, which have proven to be much more volatile. EU referendum vote choice stands out for its stability.
In December 2018, Benjamin Lauderdale conducted public opinion research for YouGov on Brexit opinions in each British constituency. While the headline result focused on support or opposition for Theresa May’s deal, what I found most interesting from this research was data on the proportion of Remain support in each constituency. In spite of 2.5 years of major changes in British politics, the constituency-level Remain results from the December 2018 poll were remarkably similar to the estimates of the June 2016 referendum.
To provide an illustration, I have compared the 2016 referendum vote to the reported Remain support in the December 2018 YouGov research in the ten most competitive seats between Labour and the Conservatives (Figure 3). I found that on average in these Conservative-held seats targeted by Labour, there has been a 2 percentage point swing to Leave, while in the five Labour-held seats, there has been on average no change at all. Expectations that Leavers’ regret will sweep Labour into power are poorly founded.
Figure 3. Change in support for Remain in marginal Labour/Conservative marginals
Labour’s path to victory
Labour must maintain a broad electoral coalition if it wishes to form a government, something which Jeremy Corbyn began to do in 2017. On a pro-Leave manifesto, Corbyn increased Labour’s share of the national vote by 10 percentage points, the highest increase in the popular vote for Labour in a general election since 1945. In that election, a majority of the gains Labour made off the Conservatives were in Leave-voting constituencies. Overall, 61% of the constituencies Labour won in 2017 are estimated to have voted Leave.
There is no getting around the fact that Labour’s path to forming a government is necessarily through a large number of Conservative, Leave-voting constituencies.
This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of LSE Brexit, nor of the London School of Economics.
Dr Richard Johnson is a Lecturer in Politics at Lancaster University.
By the time of election,Brexit is a fact ,it will no longer be leading voters.As both parties supported Brexit, its outcome will not help Labour significantly.
The majority of Labour Members and Voters are for Remain and are likely to punish Labour for being complicit is a Tory Brexit.
Compare left leaning punishment of Labour over the Iraq War despite the decision being backed by the Tories.
“we cannot say that the proportion of people who voted Leave in a constituency is reflected in the proportion of people who voted Labour in a constituency (ecological fallacy)”…. goes on to ignore the ecological fallacy.
What matters is the % of **potential Labour voters** who are influences by “leave” vs “remain”, and the evidence from surveys right after the referendum is that they are strongly remain, and the evidence from more recent surveys is that they are now more “remain” and that those who support “leave” care less about it.
e.g. 2/3rds of Labour voters in leave voting areas back a referendum on a deal, ~70% would vote remain!
Ignoring both the facts and the statistical method doesn’t work.
As has been pointed out, the hole in this piece is the assumption that if a constituency voted leave then the Labour voters, or those it requires a majority of also voted leave. Specious and woolly thinking. Try again, must do better.