LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Dipa Patel20

May 3rd, 2018

Challenging the wisdom of ‘more globalisation’

1 comment

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Dipa Patel20

May 3rd, 2018

Challenging the wisdom of ‘more globalisation’

1 comment

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Professor Robert Wade responds to the recent article for the Financial Times by the chief economic adviser to the Government of India, Arvind Subramanian’s, in which he claims the golden age of globalisation is now behind us…  

 

26 April 2018 

………………

Arvind Subramanian is correct that today’s workers in developing countries face a tougher market for converging in living conditions with counterparts in developed countries than did those in the ‘early convergers’, but his reasons need qualification  (“Today’s workers from catch-up nations face a tougher market”, 20 April).

He points to the ‘ backlash against globalisation’ as one major reason for today’s tougher conditions. The early convergers ( developing countries in the 1960s to 1990s which grew substantially faster than the developed countries, notably those in northeast Asia ) benefited hugely from expanding globalization, which allowed very fast growth of exports.

But this common line of argument misses two political points. One is that the US government ensured  preferential access to the giant US market for the northeast Asian economies, as part of the US strategy to construct a capitalist regional economy to counter communist expansion. And export promotion went hand in hand with strategic import protection, to build up a diversified industrial economy. So the fast growth of exports did not happen just because of what Mr Sumbramanian calls ‘the golden age of globalization’, meaning steady market liberalization.

Also in need of qualification is Mr Subramanian’s implication that the causes of fast or slow convergence lie within each country (such as the level of agricultural productivity and the level of better-than-minimal literacy in the population at large). This is to think of development as a marathon race, in which the position of each runner is a function of the runner’s own fitness in an open system. It ignores the many rules and reigning ideologies in the world economy which work to protect the advantage of western countries.  For example, WTO rules discourage today’s developing countries from using the kind of industrial policy used in northeast Asia to catch up, while allowing the kind of industrial policy needed by developed countries to keep on the frontier. The investor-state dispute system is another case in point.

Policymakers need to ask how to change these features of international regimes, and above all, challenge the idea that ‘more globalization’ is the path to catch up.

Robert H. Wade
Professor of Global Political Economy
London School of Economics

 


Robert H. Wade is Professor of Political Economy at the London School of Economics

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and in no way reflect those of the International Development LSE blog or the London School of Economics and Political Science.

About the author

Dipa Patel20

Posted In: Featured | Topical and Comment

1 Comments

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

  • JSRP and the future
    The JSRP drew to a close in 2017 but many of the researchers and partners involved in the programme continue to work on the issues and theories developed during the lifetime of the programme. Tim Allen now directs the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa (FLCA) at LSE where many of the JSRP research team working […]
  • Life after the LRA
    The JSRP reached the end of its grant in spring 2017 but several outputs from the programme are scheduled for publication in the coming months. The most recent of these is a new journal article from Holly Porter and Letha Victor drawing on their extensive research with JSRP in the Acholi region of northern Uganda.  The […]

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Extra-Judicial Killings in India: A Crisis of Justice, Faith and Public Morality?
    This post discusses extrajudicial killings in India, the consequent legal challenges they create, and the increasing normalisation of such encounters through pop culture and public acclamation. Gauri Kumar and Naina Bhargava highlight these arguments using specific examples, and present the existing response of the Supreme Court of India regarding extrajudicial killings.   Extrajudicial killings are […]
  • Celebrating Bangladesh at 50: A Positive Deviance
    LSE alumnus and Member of our Senior Advisory Board Ahmed Mushtaque Raza Chowdhury’s personal account of his journey in independent Bangladesh explains the triumphs of the nation against the odds, the challenges that lie ahead, and his own participation in it.           If someone asked me which year I would like to […]