LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Dipa Patel20

August 10th, 2018

Global playing field is level but only for the west

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Dipa Patel20

August 10th, 2018

Global playing field is level but only for the west

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Professor Robert Wade adds to the recent article from Dani Rodrik for the Financial Times, in which he states that the US and Europe are hypocritical when complaining about China’s infringement on ‘global norms and rules’. 

8  August 2018   

………………

Dani Rodrik, in “Global trade needs rules that adapt to economic diversity”, misses an important point ( August 6).

He says that “when the US and Europe complain that China is infringing ‘global norms and rules ’, they forget their own economic history. China’s policies are not so different from those that they too embraced while catching up with technological leaders of the time.”

This is true.  What it misses is that the US and many European countries today use aggressive industrial policy to foster frontier industries and firms, much of it below the radar of public scrutiny.  The US network of public laboratories and agencies (the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency), and Germany’s giant development bank, KfW, are cases in point.

Western states have crafted World Trade Organization rules to enable them to use industrial policy instruments appropriate for frontier industries and to prohibit or make actionable instruments appropriate for developing country industries and firms well within the frontier (like local content requirements).

The “global playing field” is “level” only from the perspective of the west. The BIC countries (Brazil, India and China)  have been cooperating in the WTO to push back against the western strategy of shrinking developing country policy space, but it is an uphill struggle.

Robert H. Wade
Professor of global political economy
London School of Economics, UK

 


Robert H. Wade is Professor of Political Economy at the London School of Economics

This article was first published on the Financial Times.

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and in no way reflect those of the International Development LSE blog or the London School of Economics and Political Science.

About the author

Dipa Patel20

Posted In: Featured | Topical and Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

  • JSRP and the future
    The JSRP drew to a close in 2017 but many of the researchers and partners involved in the programme continue to work on the issues and theories developed during the lifetime of the programme. Tim Allen now directs the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa (FLCA) at LSE where many of the JSRP research team working […]
  • Life after the LRA
    The JSRP reached the end of its grant in spring 2017 but several outputs from the programme are scheduled for publication in the coming months. The most recent of these is a new journal article from Holly Porter and Letha Victor drawing on their extensive research with JSRP in the Acholi region of northern Uganda.  The […]

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Covid-19 and the Year-long Internet Restrictions in Jammu & Kashmir
    In August 2019, the Indian Parliament abrogated Article 370 of the Constitution of India, and snapped internet and cellular services in Jammu and Kashmir in apprehension of civil unrest. High-speed internet services were suspended in the region for 18 months which was in gross violation of citizens’ rights. Kashish Khandelwal examines the immediate and long-term […]
  • The Threat of Consent
    What is the biggest concern facing South Asia over the next decade? Ritika Arora-Kukreja — winner of the LSE South Asia Centre Vera Anstey Essay Competition 2021 — argues that macroeconomic indicators, unemployment, illiteracy, poverty, and the alarming challenges surfacing across the region are no longer the only challenges we should be cognisant of; rather, […]