LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Axel M. Addy

Sebastian Petric

February 16th, 2021

Globalisation in 2021

0 comments | 8 shares

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

Axel M. Addy

Sebastian Petric

February 16th, 2021

Globalisation in 2021

0 comments | 8 shares

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

Globalisation is related to the disappearance of national boundaries to establish a single market. This refers to goods and services, capital, as well as labour. The current wave of globalisation started with the end of the Second World War and the establishment of international institutions fostering the decline in trade tariffs, which gained speed in the 1980s and 1990s as emerging markets increasingly adopted more open policies. Advocates of the latter put forward various benefits of globalisation ranging from global peace to economic prosperity, while others point to a loss of national sovereignty and the impact of multinational enterprises as criticism. In this article, Sebastian Petric and Axel Addy assess these arguments with respect to emerging market economies and evaluate the impact of the Covid-19 shock on globalisation.

The interconnection of national economies is not a new trend, but increasingly picked-up over the last decades. This is related to the substantial liberalisation of goods and financial markets around the globe, which leads to a general convergence of prices worldwide. Before the current wave of globalisation started, trade collapsed due to the two World Wars and the Great Depression in between. At the end of the Second World War most countries aimed at building institutions which would constrain the risk of conflict, as well as foster international economic cooperation. Over time, trade tariffs and barriers were reduced leading to a truly prosperous wave of opening. This accelerated in the 1980s and 1990s with the adoption of trade-orientated policies from emerging markets.

To start with, we review the arguments in favour of globalisation. While it is argued that globalisation can lead to global peace, we begin with the argument of added economic prosperity. In the 1950s, many emerging economies gained independence and adopted inward-orientated strategies. What can be said is that this inward orientation did not work as this strategy led to high capital goods prices and low levels of technology. Indeed, there is a strong negative correlation between trade barriers and economic performance. Does trade liberalisation, hence, lead to improved output numbers? Econometrically, it seems to be the case that open trade leads to improved economic performance. This is consistent with the rapid ascend of China. However, the latter does not necessarily imply that countries should rapidly remove all trade barriers across sectors.

Another dimension of globalisation is foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI does increase the overall level of investment in recipient countries and also coincides with improved research and development. Investments are attracted by adequate infrastructure, connectivity, educated workforce and lower levels of corruption among others.

Globalisation has not only positive sides. While the current wave of globalisation has certainly helped to reduce global poverty, foremost by the rise of China, there still remains the challenge of rising inequality. Globalisation generally led to a reduction in working wages in many countries while it increased returns to capital.

Additionally, in the eyes of some critics, globalisation can infringe on elements of national sovereignty, as countries, ill-equipped to benefit from them, enter into multilateral agreements that govern trade and investments. Critics argue that the lack of adequate support to build the capacity of developing countries, makes it difficult for them to benefit from market opening. But this in no way has driven a wave of countries to protectionism. While elements of protectionism impacted globalisation, the onset of the Covid pandemic fosters greater cooperation in a global response. Globalisation critics would argue is not under threat but enhanced due to required multilateral cooperation in supply chains. Regions are moving forward to consolidate their cooperation to improve regional trade and their trade with the rest of the World.

One such example is the recently created African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement. On the first day of 2021, African countries began the new year by officially trading under the AfCFTA, after delays due to the pandemic. The AfCFTA, which unites 54 of the 55 members of the African Union, entered into force on May 30, 2019 creating the largest trade bloc in the world uniting 1.3 billion people in a $3.4 trillion economic bloc. The AfCFTA in an effort to boost intra-African trade by promoting industrial production among others, is one clear example of the commitment to globalisation as an evolving means to improve inequalities.

While the Covid pandemic continues to cause massive disruptions, crippling many economies both in developing and developed countries, it is unlikely to reverse the course of globalisation. Critics would argue that the world interconnectedness, if anything, is more important now than ever, for our very survival.

To conclude, globalisation is related to the establishment of a single market as trade openness should entail increased economic prosperity. Given the failures of inward orientation, many emerging countries started to reduce barriers to trade. One recent example of this is the AfCFTA, which should boost intra-African trade by fostering industrial production among others. While the Covid pandemic certainly puts strains on many economies, globalisation is here to stay.


The views expressed in this post are those of the author and in no way reflect those of the International Development LSE blog or the London School of Economics and Political Science.

About the author

Axel M. Addy

Axel M. Addy is a senior executive with international trade policy, government and business climate reforms expertise. He is an avid advocate for trade for development and peace in Africa and a champion for SMEs’ transformation on the continent. Axel is the current CEO of Ecocap Investment Group, LLC, an advisory firm working to link investors to opportunities on the continent. He is an Executive MBA student at the University of Oxford and holds a Master’s degree from UCLA with a proven track record in trade negotiations, trade policy, and government and business climate reforms.

Sebastian Petric

Sebastian Petric is an emerging market investor and strategist. He holds a Master’s degree from the London School of Economics and Political Science and the University of Oxford. Sebastian is a committed investment professional with a proven track record in research and asset management. He recently published a book on fundamental, policy-induced and institutional vulnerabilities of emerging markets.

Posted In: Covid-19 | Department Alumni | Featured | Topical and Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

  • JSRP and the future
    The JSRP drew to a close in 2017 but many of the researchers and partners involved in the programme continue to work on the issues and theories developed during the lifetime of the programme. Tim Allen now directs the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa (FLCA) at LSE where many of the JSRP research team working […]
  • Life after the LRA
    The JSRP reached the end of its grant in spring 2017 but several outputs from the programme are scheduled for publication in the coming months. The most recent of these is a new journal article from Holly Porter and Letha Victor drawing on their extensive research with JSRP in the Acholi region of northern Uganda.  The […]

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Four Stylised Facts about Covid-19 Impacts in Sri Lanka
    The Covid-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc for economies worldwide, and smaller countries have been hit particularly badly. Sri Lanka’s economy was already under stress but was slowly moving in the right direction when the combined effects of the pandemic on public health and the economy has dealt a severe blow. Ganeshan Wignaraja suggests possible ways […]
  • Bangladesh @ 50: Challenges to Inclusion
    While we celebrate Bangladesh’s achievements in economic growth and poverty reduction, a growth-focused strategy does not serve Bangabandhu’s vision for an egalitarian society as it excludes and neglects many citizens. As Bangladesh’s economy thrives, Mathilde Maitrot and Joe Devine’s research finds there are persistent pockets of extreme poverty, some of which are getting worse, and […]