Conferences

BbWorld (TM) Europe 2007 Part Deux

Today I’m at the BbWorld Europe conference in Nice, discussing all things Blackboard. The weather’s lovely, thanks very much, but as we’re installed in a windowless concrete monolith, opportunities for working on my tan are limited.

Bruno Lanvin of the World Bank delivered an interesting keynote presentation this morning, discussing the impact of knowledge and technology transfer in driving globalization. I won’t paraphrase him too much, as his presentation will be posted to the Blackboard website later on, and his slides will work pretty well without the voice over, but I was struck by some of his statistics.

This year, humanity will generate some colossal number of exabytes of new “information”, equivalent to the sum total of information generated in the last 5000 years. He didn’t comment on how much of this stuff will be useful; I have a gloomy suspicion that 90% will be viagra spam, and much of the remainder will be pointless barking into cyberspace in the form of blogging.

But let’s assume that plenty of “applicable knowledge” is generated. Students now entering the third year of a degree programme will find the stuff they learned in their first year is out of date. As educators, therefore, we should be concentrating on developing learning skills rather than content, since we are preparing students for jobs that haven’t been created, to use technologies that haven’t been invented, and solve problems we don’t even know exist.

Next, I attended a panel session with early adopters of WebCT/Blackboard Vista. Only some of them had upgraded to Vista 4, some relatively painlessly, others… less so. One of the presenters made an interesting point about scalability: yes, you can add a few application nodes and extra database servers and run the whole shebang behind a load-balancer to serve hundreds of concurrent users, but some of the software tools themselves don’t scale particularly well. The assignments tool, for example, rapidly becomes unwieldy once you get past 50 students on a course. To be fair, I’m sure there are examples in all VLEs.

Each presenter made passing reference to “stability” being a source of complaints from the users. A fellow delegate saved me the job of pressing them on this point. Perhaps unsurprisingly, given they were invited to speak by the vendor, the presenters did a good job of blaming external factors, such as the unexpected consequences of operating system updates, pop-up blockers buried in some anti-spyware tool, Java version changes and so forth. I almost followed up by asking whether it’s such a good idea to impose strict preconditions on the user environment in the first place, but perhaps that’s a question for the developers themselves.

Chris

February 27th, 2007|Conferences|1 Comment|

Hello from BbWorld Europe 2007 (TM)

Or the Blackboard (WebCT?) 2007 European conference to those that speak English. I was planning to blog more extensively from the conference this year, but my plans have been scuppered by a distinct lack of internet access at this learning technology conference. There’s no wifi in the conference venue and the ‘cyber cafe’ (haven’t heard that term in a while) consists of about 15 stand-up email terminals for a 400 delegate conference.

It’s lunchtime on day 1 – the guy from the World Bank (Bruno Lanvin) provided a broad and interesting perspective on how technology is currently the key globalisation driver and how education and technology can work to reduce global inequalities. Typical keynote fayre.

The opening Blackboard keynote was okay – a number of vague statements on future directions and how they won’t make the same mistakes re. stability and quality in future as Blackboard have invested lots of resources for testing and quality assurance. I became more depressed when Mr Chasen added 2.0 to the end of a number of key terms. Apparently we’re to have Blackboard 2.0 (I thought they were already on 7?), along with Web 2.0, e-learning 2.0 and even… ‘education 2.0’ (I wonder if Bb have trademarked that yet). I think he means they’re planning to employ a bit of Ajax technology here and there.

To end on a brighter note – some Manchester University colleagues covered copying course content between different flavours of WebCT and Blackboard for simultaneous delivery of the same course at 4 different institutions. Their conclusion was that JISC Reload really didn’t help, while the WebCT IMS export tool was the key to migration. They had quite a few problems with migrating just one fairly basic content based course, so it served as a good reminder that we at LSE will need to be extremely thorough with our migration plans this year.

Finally, I need to go and see a brief glimpse of some Cote D’Azur sunshine after being stuck inside all day!

Kris.

February 27th, 2007|Conferences|1 Comment|

Learning Futures

The Learning Futures Conference was organised by Leicester University’s Beyond Distance Research Alliance headed by Gilly Salmon. I attended the first day which included 5 keynotes and 3 discussion sessions (in reality further presentations). Overall I was a little disappointed and didn’t get the New Year inspiration I was hoping for. In a nutshell… plan for the future… look for robustness – solutions that will work in a variety of scenarios… academics haven’t embraced e-learning yet and it’s time for tansformation, risk and making a difference.

It was great to see a student presentation as one of the keynotes though. It was given by Martin Cullen and Chloe Foster from Leicester Students Union and was based on interviews they had carried out with current students.

January 16th, 2007|Conferences|Comments Off on Learning Futures|

Personalisation of Learning

On 8 Dec 2006 I attended a workshop on “Personalisation of Learning” in Manchester, organised by the HEA’s Supporting Sustainable e-Learning Forum (SSeLF).

The day consisted of presentations by Oleg Liber (Bolton) and Mike Halm (Penn State), seeking to define what “personalisation” means and how it might be implemented in e-learning.

The workshop was much better than I had expected. Both presentations were thought-provoking, and the quality of discussion amongst the participants was high. The structure was good, with the two knowledgeable presenters using their presentations to stimulate discussion amongst the audience.

Oleg Liber’s talk investigated what we mean by “personalisation”, and sought to define what a “personal learning environment” might be. He immediately rearranged the space so that the audience were sitting in groups rather than rows, and his two-hour session was punctuated with a number of discussion periods from which we fed back the outcomes. After exploring questions such as “what is personalisation?”, “what is the difference between personal and personalised?” and “what is a PLE, and what is it not?”, he moved on to demonstrate his own vision of a PLE, a prototype system called Plex.

Mike Halm’s presentation started with an overview of the state of university teaching, using quotes from various books, especially Declining by Degrees, which looks interesting. However, there were also some rather dubious quotes, for example an assertion that “85% of learning takes place in informal contexts” which I suspect belongs in the “97% of statistics are made up” category. Later in the talk, Mike attempted to bring learning styles into the picture, which prompted a discussion about the validity of such things that went on for some time and was quite interesting, even if it did use up most of Mike’s remaining time. Finally, he demonstrated his own model of a PLE – a system called LionShare.

More detailed Personalisation workshop notes

December 11th, 2006|Conferences, Teaching & Learning|Comments Off on Personalisation of Learning|

Wikis in Education

Last week I attended ‘Exploiting the potential of wikis‘ hosted by Brian Keely, UKOLN and Steven Warburton, Kings College. It was an excellent day with a large number (70+?) of delegates from varied backgrounds within HE (IT Sevices, Learning Technology, Library and Teaching staff). Summaries of the discussion sessions can be found on the obligatory workshop wiki.

As is often the case the day threw up more question than answers but here are my reflections:

1. More examples needed
There seem to be limited examples around of wikis being used with students. The predominant model in use seems to be the “wikipedia model”. Students create a glossary, encyclopedia etc either alone or in groups. For example:

Other ideas for using wikis include collaborative report writing, online conferences and debating assigned readings

November 6th, 2006|Conferences|1 Comment|

Open Scholarship Conference: report

Marie and I, along with several colleagues from the Library, recently attended the Open Scholarship Conference at the University of Glasgow from 18th-20th October. The event attracted an audience from the UK, Europe and beyond and focused on the topic of open access repositories and how their are transforming scholarly communication. Further information is available from the conference website at: http://www.lib.gla.ac.uk/openscholarship/

Marie and I have written a detailed Open scholarship 2006 Report on the event.

November 1st, 2006|Conferences|Comments Off on Open Scholarship Conference: report|

Google is not the Net

Sarah Rosenblum passed on an interesting article from the Library Journal reporting on the American Library Association’s 2006 conference and the challenge that Google was presenting libraries. There was a lot of talk about social software but also talk of gorilla’s as well. I liked this quote:

“Google is so pervasive in so many realms that used to be specifically what libraries did,” Janes explains. “It is a collection, it is a way of searching, a navigation mechanism. It is doing all these things that look like what people used to go to libraries and librarians for.” Google, he says, “is the 800-pound gorilla.”

To read the full text see: http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6370224.html

September 20th, 2006|Conferences|Comments Off on Google is not the Net|

Two keynotes and two visions?

I talked about Diana Oblinger’s keynotes in an earlier post. But the other two keynotes, from Tim O’Shea and Stephen Heppell provided a fascinating contrast in all sorts of ways.

Both in very different styles and from very different perspectives were addressing the key question of what will education be like in future. For Tim there were real challenges ahead. The future was tough and the universities best placed to survive and thrive were the traditional academic powerhouses like Edinburgh. They have the strength, capability and resources to be best placed to develop exciting and innovative e-learning.

September 8th, 2006|Conferences|Comments Off on Two keynotes and two visions?|

ALT-C Day Three

I’ve not long arrived home from the conference and I have to say it has left me full of enthusiasm with lots of ideas and things to follow up on. Dare I say, a bit different from previous ALT conferences I’ve attended. There really was a feeling that we are getting beyond VLEs and starting to think about how the next generation actually learn.

September 7th, 2006|Conferences|Comments Off on ALT-C Day Three|

ALT-C Day 2, part 2

Just to out-blog Steve here’s my second posting of the day. This afternoon I went along and chatted to several poster presenters. Had a really interesting chat with people from Bristol about using podcasting. They have a blog which they’d really like people to post entries on about what they are doing with podcasting. I was telling them a bit about video lectures, podcasts and visualiser stuff we are doing at LSE, so Sarah and Kris do post something on: www.podcasting.blog-city.com

I also chatted some more to Iain at Glasgow Caledonian who works in the Saltire Centre and he might have a solution to our Fedora upload problem. I’ve passed on Marie’s e-mail so he’ll get in touch and he’s going to be at the Open Scholarship Conference in October. I also chatted to the Intrallect people who showed me the latest version of their repository software.

Just this moment I went to a session on e-portfolios from Shane Sutherland at Wolverhampton who have developed PebblePad. A neat tool which is really a personal learning environment as it contains blogs and many other tools which can be shared.

Right, that’s it from me as I need to get my glad rags on for the dinner tonight! Farewell folks!

September 6th, 2006|Conferences|Comments Off on ALT-C Day 2, part 2|