LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Nelly Martin-Anatias

October 11th, 2021

Insights from Indonesian migrant mothers during the 2020 New Zealand national lockdown

0 comments | 5 shares

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Nelly Martin-Anatias

October 11th, 2021

Insights from Indonesian migrant mothers during the 2020 New Zealand national lockdown

0 comments | 5 shares

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Lockdowns imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19 heighten care burdens within households and ‘bubbles’. Responsibility for meeting such burdens often falls disproportionately upon women. It is nevertheless important for research on gendered inequalities during COVID-19 to attend to the particularities of how such care work is experienced by differently positioned women. In Aotearoa New Zealand, Indonesian migrant mothers’ experiences of lockdown were mediated by the disadvantages they faced as non-native speakers of English, as well as by the ideology of Ibuism (‘motherism’) they had been socialised into during their lives in Indonesia. This led them to find life under lockdown both rewarding and stressful in ways that were distinct from other women in Aotearoa who were confronting similar demands writes Nelly Martin-Anatias et al.

_______________________________________________

 

Indonesianists and Southeast Asian (SEA) specialists have rightly been focusing on the recent experiences of Indonesians in Indonesia as they grapple with the Delta variant. However, it is also important to do research on the experiences of Indonesians in diaspora so that we can find ways to support them. The Care And Responsibility Under Lockdown (CARUL) Collective, which was created in March 2020 by LSE SEAC Associate Professor Dr Nicholas Long and Dr Sharyn Graham Davies, director of the Herb Feith Indonesia Engagement Centre at Monash University, has been doing exactly that.

After being COVID-19 free in the community for more than six months in Auckland and almost for a year in many parts of Aotearoa New Zealand (hereafter NZ), the country needed to enter another Level 4 lockdown – the strictest stage- starting from 18 August 2021, when everyone needed to stay at home with their “bubble”, except for grocery shopping, going to pharmacies, and exercising locally. Both the government’s reaction and the people’s are the reflection from their pandemic consciousness (Long et al, 2020). The government’s swift movement is again met with a positive response from many New Zealanders (NZers) based on our latest survey under the CARUL collective. Filled out by approximately 940 NZers, the majority support the government’s snap decision to implement the strictest lockdown in the country. While the majority strongly agree to this, we understand that there may be groups of minorities that have been affected more than others, and one of them is migrant mothers. Our concern is grounded on one of our last publications on the lockdown Ibuism and the interviews we did last year. During the 2020 national lockdown which occurred from March to May 2020 for about seven weeks, we interviewed eight (8) Indonesian migrant mothers during the alert levels 3, 2 and 1 (the most relaxed stage) and post-lockdown in May-June 2020 and the interviews were done either via Zoom or in person. The recruitment was done via social media posts, word of mouth, and WhatsApp groups. As a background, these Indonesian mothers are heterosexually married to Indonesian men and moved to New Zealand, temporarily or permanently, for various reasons from studying to following their husband’s work relocation. In this regard, some of them needed to leave their professional career in Indonesia.

Among other messaging that has been used by the government during the global pandemic since last year, there are three important ones e.g., “Stay at home,” “Stay with your bubble” and “We’re in this together” which will be discussed from the perspectives of the Indonesian migrant mothers in NZ. In order to fully understand the discussion in the later section, let us now try to understand the ideological understanding that may have inspired the devotion shown by the migrant Indonesian mothers during the 2020 NZ national lockdown.

 

Ibuism (motherism): The patriarchal ideology that may have inspired these moms’ devotion

Compared to their NZ fellow mothers, the Indonesian migrant mothers seem to treat mothering as their kodrat (destiny) as a woman, where they need to put their husband and their children’s need in the centre (Ibuism or motherism). While their role is central in the household, for many, the role is often seen and self-perceived only as their husband’s wife/companion and their children’s mother as argued by a feminist Indonesian scholar, Julia Suryakusuma.

Our 2020 survey showed how the NZ mothers are equally overwhelmed when it comes to the child-rearing and the lockdown homeschooling. However, while the NZ mothers see child-rearing and the lockdown homeschooling as ‘work’ that can be negotiated and divided with their partner or the father of the children, the Indonesian migrant mothers treat their mothering as part of their kodrat (destiny) as a woman. Their domestic and child-rearing roles are automatically assumed, while their husband’s involvement is highly regarded and marked, as recounted by Intan who shares how she felt physically fatigued during the lockdown, due to the increased domestic work, i.e., preparing the meals and teaching their teenage children during the lockdown. When asked why she didn’t direct their children to ask their father for their school matters, Intan argued that “My children feel more comfortable asking me than their dad” hinting at the sense of comfort she offered to her children. This is quite surprising given that her husband presumably has a higher English proficiency due to his professional job and his higher educational degree(s).

It seems that for her children, the lockdown homeschooling is not only a matter of their parents’ linguistic skills (and perhaps, also intellectual capabilities), but is also related to the emotional distance or the accessibility of the parents when they are at home. For many Indonesians, a married woman needs to have this sifat keibuan or motherly nature, and their un-wavering care towards their children’s needs.  Ayah or father, on the other hand, is often seen as someone who is distant, busy making a living, thus “don’t disturb them when they are at home”.  Thus, perhaps, it is because their mother is more ‘visible’ at home, so for her children, she is more approachable and can provide more comfort to them. In this light, Intan appears to reflect her identity as a ‘perfect’ Indonesian woman, with her sifat keibuan or her motherly nature.

 

Mothering during lockdown: Physically and mentally demanding

Mothering is intensive, emotionally absorbing, time-consuming, labour-intensive and is often seen as gendered work for a woman, as argued by Sharon Hays.  Pre-lockdown Mothering, while intensive, seems to give more space for their migrant mothers to have some flexible time when it comes to organizing their family’s activities. As Lintang, Saras, and Intan narrated before lockdown, they could at least have some ‘spare time’ to do their own stuff once they sent their children to school and their husband to work. During the lockdown, this ‘alone time’ was almost non-existent, since they needed to do the child-rearing 24/7, do the house chores, teach their children’s homeschooling and organise the timetable, so that their children could study while their husband could work without any interruption while they were staying with their bubble. A similar narrative is also shared by Saras who needed to teach her 9-year-old son all day, from morning to afternoon, leaving her very limited time even to grab some food or to shower. It is so intensive that they often used the words pusing (headache) and stres (feeling stressed) to refer to these newly found routines during lockdown. While pusing and stres, they still assumed these additional responsibilities and increased domestic work highlighting that for the migrant mothers, their motherhood is complex and stands at the intersection of their personal and cultural choice and understanding.

 

“Stay at home” and “stay with your bubble” for the Indonesian migrant families in New Zealand

During the national lockdown in 2020, the word “bubble” is redefined to refer to the New Zealander’s exclusive social circle (Trnka & Davies, 2020) and becomes a lockdown buzzword in NZ. With the current national lockdown in NZ due to the Delta outbreak as a result of the ‘travel bubble’ with its neighbouring country, Australia, starting from 18 August 2021, the buzzword has re-emerged and needs to be re-used in the NZers’ life to make sure we limit our movement in order to flatten the curve and eliminate the virus one more time.

For the migrant families, to “stay at home” and “stay with your bubble” may also entail not having access to school, to their children’s teachers, family friends, friends, or leisure facilities. For Nia, a mother of a 4-year-old son, this means her son cannot access the playgrounds near her residential areas, due to alert Level 4 restrictions, where she can also meet other mothers while their children play. During the alert Level 4, meeting other mums and children means violating the “stay at home” policy and breaking her “bubble”. Thus, for her, lockdown also means no access to her groups where she can at least refresh and socialize with other mums, while her son is playing with other children. For other participants, restrictions during the alert Level 4 are also translated to being unable to send their children for their Saturday activities, such as swimming lessons. To “stay at home” and “stay with your bubble” for these mums means they cannot at least have “a break” from the child-rearing, even on weekends.

Nia further mentioned the lack of access to ‘outside’ helpers. As lockdown mothering has intensified for her, she often imagined that her lockdown life would have been ‘easier’ and less ‘stressful’ if she were in Indonesia. In Indonesia, as she recalled, she would have received some help from either her mother-in-law or her domestic helper (Pembantu Rumah Tangga, who is customarily a woman) to do the domestic chores and the child-rearing. The husband seems to be missing from this narrative. This perspective seems to be shared by Tina, a post-graduate student who believes that a man is not attuned (tidak telaten) to be a child caregiver. In other words, when it comes to the domestic chores and the child-rearing, it is always seen as the woman’s job.

However, it is also important to note that it is during lockdown that these mothers saw their husbands’ increased involvement in the domestic chores. As Lia and Lintang narrated, lockdown has given some extra time for their husband to spend more time with their children or to occasionally help them with the domestic chores, such as dishwashing and child-rearing or cooking, in which pre-lockdown, their time is limited due to their busy schedule outside home. This still shows how child-rearing and domestic chores are gendered issues for these migrant mothers, as their husband’s involvement is still marked and highlighted.

While the physical burden has also been shared by some of their NZ  mothers as reflected on our CARUL survey, these migrant mothers needed to shoulder another burden, due to structural inequality and their identity as a second language speaker of English. This linguistic discrimination is uncovered when these migrant mothers needed to assume their new role: As a teacher during their children’s lockdown homeschooling.

 

Lockdown homeschooling: A new territory and linguistically challenging

The 2020 lockdown homeschooling was short-lived. While short-lived, the Indonesian migrant mothers revealed that they have been physically, mentally, and linguistically challenged. The government has been very good and fast in responding to the logistical and technological needs of the people. While logistical needs are well-supported, there is one aspect that seems to be overlooked; that is the minority’s linguistic ability as second language speakers of English. In terms of their English proficiency, aside from the two post-graduate student mothers, other interviewers have reported that they have been struggling when it comes to understanding school concepts, let alone teaching it to their school children, as shared by Dewi, a mother of two sons (8-years and 3-years old):

It was hard especially for us, who are used to learning the concept in Indonesian, [to teach] in a different language. Here, I needed to teach (my child) in English. So, I had to learn the language (English) first, then after that, I had to learn the materials. It was hard, especially the literacy, because I have very limited English.

Dewi needed to do at least ‘one teaching day’ to teach herself – to familiarize herself with the concepts on her son’s school materials and to make sure she understood them correctly as they were all written in English, a foreign language for her. Every day, Dewi needed to teach her 8-year-old son during the lockdown. It was not easy, as she not only needed to understand the concept, and but also needed to teach it in English. A similar complaint is also shared by Saras. Pusing (headache) and terpaksa (required due to imposition) are the two words repeated frequently by these mothers, when it comes to their children’s lockdown homeschooling.

Now that NZ is in another national lockdown, this issue is becoming relevant again. Our observations towards the government’s recent speeches and daily updates, however, still see that the NZ government pays more attention to logistical and technological needs, leaving these mothers’ linguistic issue -again- overlooked. Perhaps the (mis)conception that everyone speaks English is too prevalent and is widely believed even by the government, leaving these migrant mothers to struggle by themselves when it comes to lockdown homeschooling. “We’re in this together” government’s messaging, again, seems to be jarring uncomfortably with these migrant mothers. It is our hope that the NZ government is paying more attention to the migrant mothers who are second language speakers of English. They exist and need to be assisted linguistically, more than with the logistical necessities.

 

Hikmah: Appreciation delivered during the 2020 lockdown

Just like many other Indonesians who have been taught to see ‘the good thing’ despite the difficult thing, these mothers, while exhausted, are still able to see the good thing or hikmah during the lockdown. Lintang, a housewife moving to Auckland due to her husband’s work relocation, shared that the homeschooling lockdown offered her an opportunity to learn what her 8-year-old son has studied at school. She admitted that prior to the lockdown, she didn’t really get involved with her son’s school materials, noting that she completely trusts her son’s school system and the teachers. During lockdown when she needed to assume the teaching role, she admitted that she learned for the very first time what her son actually learned at his school and found the materials were intellectually interesting, even for her. While exhausted, she recalled that she enjoyed the teaching-learning moment with her son which for her would not have happened unless terpaksa or required. Lockdown seems to give her that particular opportunity.

Lockdown has also brought another hikmah by minimizing the distance between the two-worlds, i.e., domestic chores and the husband’s work. Lintang recounted how she felt more thankful towards her husband. Through lockdown, she has come to understand how demanding her husband’s work is and how hard he has worked for the family. Similarly, Lintang’s husband has come to notice and appreciate Lintang more, as he witnessed how hard his wife has worked to juggle between the child-rearing and the domestic chores, while prioritising her husband and children’s needs. This long overdue recognition and appreciation was also experienced by Lia, who eventually received her husband’s verbal compliment for her scarification and devotion during the lockdown.

While long overdue, the dedication to keep their “bubbles” together- safe and healthy- is still needed to be verbally and sincerely expressed, particularly during this difficult time.  And once again, during the 2021 NZ national lockdown, these mothers’ dedication and devotion are much needed. Hopefully both the NZ and Indonesian government and husbands do not overlook all the hard work and dedication of these migrant mothers and find ways to assist them during the current lockdown in order to keep their “bubbles” and themselves safe and healthy.

 


Notes: The interviews were completed by the lead author, Dr. Nelly Martin-Anatias in May-June 2020 in the participants’ native language, Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian). The interviews were then translated into English by Nelly. This piece is drawn from the publication ‘Lockdown Ibuism: Experiences of Indonesian Migrant Mothers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Aotearoa New Zealand’ by Dr. Nelly Martin-Anatias et al. that is accessible here and is part of the CARUL (Care And Responsibility Under Lockdown) larger research project. To learn about other CARUL projects, you can view them here.

 


*Cover image by Elena Mozhvilo on Unsplash

* The views expressed in the blog are those of the authors alone. They do not reflect the position of the Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre, nor that of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

 


About the co- authors

Nicholas Long

Dr Nicholas Long is a SEAC Associate and Associate Professor of Anthropology at the London School of Economics and Political Science, where he works on the anthropology of Indonesia and on responses to COVID-19 in the UK and Aotearoa New Zealand. Author of Being Malay in Indonesia: Histories, Hopes and Citizenship in the Riau Archipelago, and co-editor of The Social Life of Achievement, Southeast Asian Perspectives on Power, Sociality: New Directions, and The State We’re In: Reflecting on Democracy’s Troubles, Nick won the 2019 Stirling Prize for Best Published Work in Psychological Anthropology for his article ‘Suggestions of Power: Searching for Efficacy in Indonesia’s Hypnosis Boom’.

Sharyn Davies

Dr Sharyn Davies is the Director of the Herb Feith Indonesian Engagement Centre at Monash University in Melbourne. She has published extensively on gender in Indonesia including Sex ad Sexualities in Contemporary Indonesia (Routledge) with Linda Bennett.

Pounamu Jade Aikman

Dr. Pounamu Jade Aikman is a Māori scholar of Ngāti Awa, Ngāi Te Rangi, and Ngāti Maniapoto descent. His research background explores the relationship between Indigenous sovereignty and state violence, through an interrogation of the central role of racism in maintaining the settler colonial state.

Nayantara Appleton

Dr. Nayantara Sheoran Appleton is a Senior Lecturer at the interdisciplinary Centre for Science in Society, Victoria University of Wellington. Trained as a feminist medical anthropologist and STS Scholar (with a PhD in cultural studies) her first project is a book on Emergency contraception in India. Having recently moved to Aotearoa New Zealand, she is now starting to conceptualize a project that explores relationship between immigrant and indigenous communities. Most recently she has been working with diverse communities in Aotearoa New Zealand and India on their experiences of COVID-19. She has written about ‘the bubble’ in NZ as new public health vocabulary.

Antje Deckert

Dr. Antje Deckert is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Auckland University of Technology. She is co-editor in chief of the journal Decolonization of Criminology and Justice and co-editor of the Palgrave Handbook of Australian and New Zealand Criminology, Crime and Justice (Palgrave 2017) and Decolonising our futures: Neo-colonial Criminal Justice and the Mass Imprisonment of Indigenous Women (Palgrave 2020). Her primary research interest concerns the sociology of criminological knowledge. More specifically, she examines mainstream academic and media criminological discourses and their interactions with Indigenous peoples and epistemologies.

Edmond fehoko

Dr. Edmond Fehoko has a Master’s degree in Social Sciences and a PhD in Public Health in the field of gambling addiction from the Auckland University of Technology. Edmond has received a number of national and international awards including the Prime Ministers Pacific Youth Award and Sunpix Pacific Peoples Education award for services to Pacific education and research.

Eleanor Holroyd

Professor Eleanor Holroyd, is a nurse medical anthropologist, and Head of Research In Clinical Sciences, Co-Director of the Centre for Migrant and Refugee Studies, her co–research projects and publications are on Asian women health, sexual health and migration. She has worked most of her career at universities in Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand.

Naseem Jivraj

Naseem Jivraj is a PhD student at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Her research centres on how migrant Muslim South Asian women who marry UK citizens face the challenges of their precarious familial, emotional, legal and social situations following tensions in and breakup of their marriage and family connections. She has contributed to ‘A good death’ during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK: a report on key findings and recommendations’ (2020) and the rapid research report ‘Living in bubbles during the coronavirus pandemic: insights from New Zealand’ (2020). In 2019 she reviewed Kaveri Quereshi’s Marital Breakdown Among British Asian: Conjugality, Legal Pluralism and New Kinship for the Association for Feminist Anthropology.

Megan Laws

Megan Laws is a Fellow in the Department of Anthropology at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She is a specialist in the anthropology of southern Africa, with research interests in how experiences of uncertainty shape egalitarian values and redistributive practices. She is also a research associate in the Department of Geography at University College London, working with a team of interdisciplinary researchers who work with marginalised communities to develop digital tools for collecting geo-referenced data on a range of social and ecological issues.

Michael Roguski

Dr. Michael Roguski is a criminologist in Aotearoa New Zealand. He is Director of Kaitiaki Research and Evaluation and specialises in sensitive topic and social justice related research.

Nikita Simpson

Nikita Simpson is a PhD Candidate in Anthropology at the London School of Economics where she conducted ethnographic fieldwork on women’s mental health and wellbeing in rural Northern India. She is also research co-ordinator of the Covid and Care Research Group at LSE, focused on using participatory methods to design policy that supports communities disadvantaged by the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Rogena Sterling

Dr. Rogena Sterling has completed a LLB, LLM and a PhD (Identity and its protection as the aim and purpose of international human rights law: The case of (inter)sex identity and its protection). Dr Sterling has taught in the areas of jurisprudence, administrative law, urban planning law and governance, and social policy. Areas of focus for written work and presentations includes: clinical legal education, equality and leadership, Māori (co-)governance, international law, international and national human rights, diversity and inclusion, categories and data, Indigenous data sovereignty, intellectual property and intersex issues.

Susanna Trnka

Dr. Susanna Trnka is an Associate Professor in anthropology at the University of Auckland whose work examines embodiment through a variety of lenses, including pain; political violence; children’s health; movement; and youth wellbeing. She has contributed to new theories of collective responsibility through her co-edited book, Competing Responsibilities: The Politics and Ethics of Contemporary Life (Duke University Press, 2017) and her work on asthma, e.g. One Blue Child: Asthma, Responsibility, and the Politics of Global Health (Stanford University Press, 2017). Her most recent book, Traversing: Embodied Lifeworlds in the Czech Republic (Cornell University Press, 2020), is a phenomenological examination of movement.

Laumua Tunufa’i

Dr. Laumua Tunufa’i lectures in Criminology at New Zealand’s Auckland University of Technology. His research and teaching areas of interest are youth justice, restorative justice, Pacific and Indigenous criminology, and Pacific epistemologies.

About the author

Nelly Martin-Anatias

Dr Nelly Martin-Anatias is a Research Fellow at the School of Social Sciences and Public Policy Auckland University of Technology (AUT), New Zealand (NZ). Her research interests include but are not limited to language, identity, gender, language ideology, code-switching in both film scripts and literary fiction, textual and interpretive analysis, and autoethnography. She is currently working on some research projects on the minority language maintenance and language ideologies in NZ, and on the language barrier in the fertility treatment access, among others. Her recent publications are accessible on the journals of World Englishes, South East Asia Research, Humanity and Society, the Journal of Homosexuality, Language@internet and Text&Talk.

Posted In: COVID-19 and Southeast Asia | Reflections

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.