About the LSE Impact Blog
Our blog family
Subscribe to the Impact Blog via Email or RSS
Write for us
Sort By: Most Recent
Better, fairer, more meaningful research evaluation – in seven hashtags
September 27th, 2018
Impact from critical research: what might it look like and what support is required?
September 4th, 2018
How should we balance the research impact ecosystem?
June 15th, 2018
Essential 'how-to' guides
Guidance on testimonials and statements to corroborate impact
June 8th, 2018
Your research has been broadcast to millions – but how do you determine its impact?
May 3rd, 2018
Impact is crippling higher education. But it is still part of the solution
April 23rd, 2018
Does not compute: why I’m proposing a moratorium on academics’ use of the term “outputs”
April 11th, 2018
The gendered impact agenda – how might more female academics’ research be submitted as REF impact case studies?
March 8th, 2018
Hitting the QR sweet spot: will new REF2021 rules lead to a different kind of game-playing?
March 7th, 2018
Resist? Welcome? Co-opt? Ignore? The pressures and possibilities of the REF and impact
February 26th, 2018
The RAE/REF have engendered evaluation selectivity and strategic behaviour, reinforced scientific norms, and further stratified UK higher education
February 13th, 2018
The creative elements of engagement mean that using metrics to measure impact is not always possible
February 6th, 2018
2017 in review: round-up of our top posts on research evaluation and impact
December 30th, 2017
The Social Mobility Commission is dead. So what does this mean for the impacts arising from the social sciences research that informed its reports?
December 6th, 2017
That's all the posts! come back soon
« Previous Page
Next Page »
This work by
LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog
is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported