LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Keith McDonald

March 23rd, 2015

Industrial Policy for Development? Causes, Mechanisms and Consequences of Industrial Policy Across the World

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Keith McDonald

March 23rd, 2015

Industrial Policy for Development? Causes, Mechanisms and Consequences of Industrial Policy Across the World

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Dr Silvia Masiero, Research Fellow
Dr Silvia Masiero, LSE Research Fellow

Dr Silvia Masiero, Research Fellow in the Department of International Development, writes on the 2015 Development Debate featuring Professor Robert Wade and Professor Francesco Caselli.

This year’s Development Debate, titled ‘Industrial Policy for Development?’, featured two world-class experts on industrial policy and development, plus a room overflowing with enthusiastic students and penetrating questions. Prof. Robert Wade, Professor of Political Economy and Development at LSE ID, debated with Prof. Francesco Caselli, Norman Sosnow Professor of Economics at the LSE, and Director of the Macroeconomics Program at the Centre for Economic Performance (CEP).

The idea of an “inclusive debate” came alive through the lively participation of students from the ID department and beyond, who engaged the experts, questioning and challenging them on the multiple implications of industrial policy. What follows is a summary of the main arguments put forward in the debate and the rich threads of the discussion that ensued. Although highly summarised, we hope to convey a sense of the enriching discussion.

Robert Wade Francesco Caselli Debate, 2015

Prof. Caselli opened the debate with a discussion of industrial policy at large, inscribed in the contemporary vision of development and modernization as a whole. As a core idea, he put forward the concept of a ladder of development – a sequence of stages, or historical phases, each of which is a precondition for moving up to the next one. This notion transcends the layered understanding of development portrayed by modernization theory: on the contrary, it implies an open-ended world system, in which nothing in the world economy is there to maintain a significant gradient between territories (e.g. a gradient in productivity, value-added, or generation of knowledge).

Prof. Wade, in his opening statement, opted for a slightly different descriptive metaphor of the world economy. He put forward the idea of a hierarchy, or more exactly a pyramid with “limited room at top”. A very small number of countries (and populations) have become “developed” in the past two centuries, and their number seems even smaller if one considers the vast “development industry” that has been in place since World War II. This dynamics, observed in the world economy at large, is captured by Prof. Wade’s metaphor of the pyramid.

But this dynamics, Prof. Wade suggests, is also consistent with a broader hypothesis: namely, the one according to which the world economy generates forces that are analogous to gravity, which make the movement up Prof. Caselli’s ladder very difficult. This implies that a first mover advantage may leave developing countries behind, locking them in an “arms race” that they are doomed to lose as a result of initial disadvantage. Both speakers agreed that what might be called the Adam Smith minimal state, which provides peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice, but little else, is beyond the reach of many developing countries today.

Robert Wade Francesco Caselli Debate, 2015

A student’s question sparked discussion of the suggestive oxymoron: the recent “non-emergence” of most “emerging market economies”. Several market economies considered to be emerging have failed to build sustained rates of growth, or to generate systemic trickle-down mechanisms from economic growth to broader social development. In South Asia and Latin America, big anti-poverty programmes have been developed on the wave of movements to uplift the poor on a wide scale. But strong top-down social safety policies can only be sustained in the long run if coupled with a prosperous economy, the lack of which has led, along with the lack of trickle-down mechanisms, to suboptimal outcomes for big anti-poverty programmes (India, Brazil).

What implications flow from the experts’ core arguments? The idea of an open-ended ladder implies that states should attempt to shape the production structure only once the economy reaches a fairly high point in the ladder. Even if the ladder model is not accurate, the reality is that industrial policy often fails in developing states. As reported by Prof. Wade, a senior World Bank economist asked him in conversation, “For every Korea there are a hundred failures. Who would you put your money on?”

Could the two speakers’ points of view be reconciled? One possible metaphor seeking a synthesis of ladder and pyramid is: a bidimensional pyramid ladder, so the rungs are wider at bottom than at top (i.e. there is less room at top). This seems to incorporate both Prof’ Caselli’s idea of an open-ended ladder, and Prof’ Wade’s hierarchical view in the form of a pyramid. A suggestive metaphor indeed, and one that closes a fascinating, deeply informative discussion!

Robert Wade Francesco Caselli Debate, 2015

A full recording of the debate is available here (LSE staff and students only).

About the author

Keith McDonald

Posted In: Events | Featured

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

  • JSRP and the future
    The JSRP drew to a close in 2017 but many of the researchers and partners involved in the programme continue to work on the issues and theories developed during the lifetime of the programme. Tim Allen now directs the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa (FLCA) at LSE where many of the JSRP research team working […]
  • Life after the LRA
    The JSRP reached the end of its grant in spring 2017 but several outputs from the programme are scheduled for publication in the coming months. The most recent of these is a new journal article from Holly Porter and Letha Victor drawing on their extensive research with JSRP in the Acholi region of northern Uganda.  The […]

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Skewed Normatives in India’s Judicial Discourse on Rape
    India has relatively strong legal frameworks in place to promote gender equality. However, the achievement of justice and equality for women in their everyday lives remains an elusive goal. Medha Garg analyses some judicial pronouncements from cases involving rape to argue that the judiciary itself often displays patriarchal attitudes that indirectly reinforce sexist and misogynistic […]
  • South Asia: A Frontier for Sustainability on a Dying Planet
    How can South Asia contribute to Global Development? Elias Khoury — winner of the LSE South Asia Centre Vera Anstey Essay Competition 2022 — argues that the rest of the world, and especially countries of the Global North, should learn development strategies from South Asia which has pursued sustainable models despite challenges and problems, and achieved success.  […]