LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Sarah Carr

June 29th, 2016

Demographic Change and Democratization – Professor Tim Dyson

3 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Sarah Carr

June 29th, 2016

Demographic Change and Democratization – Professor Tim Dyson

3 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

In recent articles, Tim Dyson, Professor of Population Studies, explores the relationship between progress through the demographic transition and political advance.

Tim Dyson UN WebcastThe first article, titled ‘On Demographic and Democratic Transitions’, appears in Population and Development Review 38 (Supp.) and is available open access. It deals with the development of democracy in Europe between around 1890 and 1930. The second article, co-authored with Ben Wilson, is titled ‘Democracy and the Demographic Transition’ and appears in Democratization. It deals with the expansion of democracy in the world in the period since 1970, in countries that were initially autocratic. Both papers find that a country’s progress through the demographic transition has been a powerful promoter/facilitator of democracy. The beneficial effects operate during the ‘second half’ of the demographic transition—when the birth rate falls, population growth slows, and the population becomes markedly older. Demographic progress is gauged by rises in a country’s median age. A country with a low median age is not just young—i.e. full of children—it will also have high fertility and its population will be growing rapidly. In these conditions demographic destabilization tends to threaten political destabilization—and countries are unlikely to be stable democracies (far from it!) A country with a high median age will have low fertility and its population will be growing slowly (if at all). Importantly, a country with a high median age is mature—i.e. there are lots of adults—and women have other things to do than engage in repeated childbearing and childcare. In the case of historical Europe, the rise of a country’s median age is most closely related to the emergence of democracy. In the case of the growth of democracy in the world since 1970, the rise of a country’s median age is also very important—although so has been the spread of mass education. Both papers suggest that economic growth has no implications for democratization.

About the author

Sarah Carr

Posted In: Featured | Publications

3 Comments

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • The Rohingya Crisis: Challenges to Achieving a Sustainable Solution
    In 2017, as the world watched with horror the unfolding of the Rohingya genocide, Bangladesh became host to almost a million refugees fleeing for their lives. Now, 6 years later, with a growing Rohingya population in the refugee camps, Bangladesh feels increasingly abandoned by the international community, having to bear the financial and political burden […]
  • The Shackles of Freedom: 75 years of (In)dependence
    Institutional and infrastructural reform initiatives have been long in the making in Sri Lanka, in fact, from the time of her independence. Yet, successive political regimes have failed to bring about genuine reform. Ambika Satkunanathan explains how effective change is impossible without a fundamental shift in social, cultural and political behaviour that acknowledges and dismantles […]