LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Sarah Carr

July 13th, 2016

Chinese government was wise to resist full privatisation of land – James Putzel

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Sarah Carr

July 13th, 2016

Chinese government was wise to resist full privatisation of land – James Putzel

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

On Monday (11/07/16) Professor James Putzel had a letter published in the Financial Times in which he responds to an article from the 5 July entitled “Losing the plot“. Below is the full text

James Putzel, Programme Director, MSc Development StudiesSir, I welcomed Lucy Hornby’s Big Read article on the dilemma China faces over the future of property rights in agricultural land (“Losing the plot”, July 5). Indeed, managing the transformation of China’s rural economy and society is one of the biggest challenges the country faces in the decades to come.

In the 1980s the Chinese Communist party and state deftly managed the dismantling of ill-conceived communal farms through a “second redistributive land reform” (the first occurred with the 1949 revolution that ended the ancient landlord system, which kept the peasants mired in poverty). By devolving land-use rights to peasant households, the 1980s’ land reform unleashed a huge increase in agricultural productivity that fully exploited the rural infrastructure created during the communal period and opened the way for a stepwise increase in investment in agriculture. This initially was provided by the “sweat equity” of farming households followed by inventive co-operative and contractual arrangements allowing entrepreneurs to invest in new technology and production organisation. The state invested significantly in agricultural research, technology and extension services.

But, in a similar manner to the developmental states of north-east Asia, such as Japan, South Korea and even Taiwan, where land reforms were followed by great restrictions on agricultural land markets that persist to this day, the Chinese government wisely resisted full privatisation of land. This is because, like its north-east Asian predecessors, the proportion of the population still dependent on rural livelihoods and village forms of social security is and will remain far higher than was the case in less densely populated western Europe or North America at the same per capita gross domestic product.

The challenge facing China is to ensure democratic control over village co-operatives that exercise ownership over the land and to ensure that rural communities can continue to benefit from land rents to support the rural elderly and the diversification of the rural economy. At the same time, maintaining restrictions over land markets is crucial to keeping the best agricultural land under production and to prevent land ownership from becoming a new source of inequality and speculative activity, which sparked the Chinese revolution in the first place.

Prof James Putzel
London School of Economics, UK

The full text can be found on the Financial Times website

About the author

Sarah Carr

Posted In: Featured | Topical and Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

  • JSRP and the future
    The JSRP drew to a close in 2017 but many of the researchers and partners involved in the programme continue to work on the issues and theories developed during the lifetime of the programme. Tim Allen now directs the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa (FLCA) at LSE where many of the JSRP research team working […]
  • Life after the LRA
    The JSRP reached the end of its grant in spring 2017 but several outputs from the programme are scheduled for publication in the coming months. The most recent of these is a new journal article from Holly Porter and Letha Victor drawing on their extensive research with JSRP in the Acholi region of northern Uganda.  The […]

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Four Stylised Facts about Covid-19 Impacts in Sri Lanka
    The Covid-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc for economies worldwide, and smaller countries have been hit particularly badly. Sri Lanka’s economy was already under stress but was slowly moving in the right direction when the combined effects of the pandemic on public health and the economy has dealt a severe blow. Ganeshan Wignaraja suggests possible ways […]
  • Bangladesh @ 50: Challenges to Inclusion
    While we celebrate Bangladesh’s achievements in economic growth and poverty reduction, a growth-focused strategy does not serve Bangabandhu’s vision for an egalitarian society as it excludes and neglects many citizens. As Bangladesh’s economy thrives, Mathilde Maitrot and Joe Devine’s research finds there are persistent pockets of extreme poverty, some of which are getting worse, and […]