LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Isabella Salkeld

May 19th, 2021

Renewable energy won’t save us from ecological disaster

1 comment | 3 shares

Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

Isabella Salkeld

May 19th, 2021

Renewable energy won’t save us from ecological disaster

1 comment | 3 shares

Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

MSc Environmental Policy & Regulation candidate, Isabella Salkeld explores the world of deep-sea mining for renewable energy and questions whether we are being sold a “greenwashed ideal”. 

Machines intended for use in deep-sea mining off Papua New Guinea. Greenpeace have warned about the risks to wildlife. Photograph: Nautilus minerals.

The key to solving climate change, we’re told, is to transition away from fossil fuels to clean energy. Wind turbines and solar panels will power a carbon-free future, creating thousands of green jobs in the process. And yet, omitted from this narrative heralding ‘green growth’ and ‘sustainable development’ is any mention of the destructive processes involved in sourcing key components of renewable technology: rare earth minerals.

Demand for rare earth minerals is soaring, causing a global expansion of open-pit mining, one of the most dangerous industrial sectors in the world. A mineral such as neodymium, which increases the blade rotation speed in wind turbines, is found in rocks encased in another mineral. Once these rocks are extracted from the soil, by injecting chemicals into the ground, they must be crushed and cracked, an energy-intensive process requiring high temperatures. After this comes ‘leaching’, dunking the minerals in leaching ponds, large plastic-lined wastewater pools filled with acids and chemicals to further separate the elements. Once built, wind turbines and solar panels have a life span of approximately 25 years, and many of the earth minerals inside them cannot be separated and reused.

Open-pit mining is potentially fatal for human health, exposing workers to high levels of toxins and radioactive by-products which can damage the central nervous system, cause cancer, or lead to cardiovascular and respiratory problems. Bayan Obo, China, home to the world’s largest rare earth mineral deposit, has one of the country’s highest malignant tumour mortality rates. The environmental damage is also severe, causing soil erosion, acidification, and dangerous levels of pollution in surface and groundwater, leading to reduced crop yields and biodiversity loss.

Renewable energy will not save us from ecological disaster, it will perpetuate old systems of pollution and oppression in ways the oil and gas industry has done for decades.

Just as oil extraction is justified in the name of development, rare earth mining is justified in the name of sustainable development. Just as Shell, a billion-dollar Anglo-Dutch oil company, allowed continued oil spills to destroy the livelihoods of poor farmers in the Niger Delta, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd, an Australian rare earths company which mines in Australia, has outsourced its minerals processing plant, the dirtiest part of its supply chain, to Malaysia. Historic injustice is set to repeat itself: the world’s most marginalised will suffer the effects of resource extraction to satisfy the insatiable energy demands of the Global North.

Malaysia has a history of being ‘used and abused’ by powerful corporations to do their dirty work. In the eighties, Mitsubishi Chemical established a rare earth plant in Bukit Merah, which led to the accumulation of unsafe levels of radioactive waste. Despite calls from experts and residents to act, the plant remained open, leading to eight workers dying of leukaemia. Decades after the plant’s closure the clean-up is ongoing, and children are still being born with physical defects.

Lynas has now seen a similar opportunity to dump its radioactive waste overseas. Experts have expressed concern for rural fisherman and farmers who rely on unpolluted water for their livelihoods, especially since groundwater pollution is exacerbated by flooding during monsoon season. After tensions mounted and Lynas threatened legal action, the Malaysian government agreed the company could build a permanent waste disposal facility in the area. Norman Moore, leader of the Western Australia government, reportedly announced in June 2011 that the Australian government would refuse to take back any radioactive waste produced from the processing plant, despite knowing that 2,200 tonnes of it were expected to be produced there annually.

The response from Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia’s incumbent Prime Minister, highlights the power imbalance at play: “If you treat Lynas like a pariah, and ask them to leave this country, we will not get other people to come to this country to invest.” Determined to attract foreign investment to grow their struggling economies, governments in the Global South will often concede to highly inequitable deals. Harmful endeavours such as mining and radioactive waste disposal are legitimised in the name of development, despite the potentially disastrous consequences this can have for the world’s most vulnerable. Rich nations’ neo-colonial contempt for the Global South will only further exacerbate these trends.

Without a reimagining of our energy-intensive capitalist system – which fuels incessant growth, extraction, and wastage – ecological crises, and the wealth of environmental injustices underpinning them, will remain unresolved. In April, the BBC reported that a deep sea mining machine had been stranded on the ocean floor of the Pacific, a worrying sign of what’s to come: earth mineral companies colonising the ocean to tear up the seabed.

At some point, growth must be curbed, or we risk pushing the Earth beyond its biophysical limits and destroying communities’ livelihoods in the process. Whilst decarbonisation plays an important role in tackling climate change in the short term, the unjust and destructive processes inherent in renewable energy’s production expose the term ‘sustainable development’ for what is really is – a greenwashed ideal.

 


The views expressed in this post are those of the author and in no way reflect those of the International Development LSE blog or the London School of Economics and Political Science.

About the author

Isabella Salkeld

Isabella is a MSc student at LSE studying Environmental Policy; Regulation. Prior to her Master's, she worked at Portland, delivering global communications strategies for UN-affiliated organisations seeking to accelerate green finance and progress towards the SDGs. She is particularly passionate about ensuring a just transition as the world move towards a net zero economy.

Posted In: Climate Emergency | Student Experience | Topical and Comment

1 Comments

RSS Justice and Security Research Programme

RSS LSE’s engagement with South Asia

  • Digital Product Passports: Climate Emergency and Bangladesh’s RMG Industry
    Bangladesh remains very vulnerable to climate emergencies & climate-induced disasters, now and in future. Some of its most important economic sectors — like the Ready-made Garments (RMG) industry — have a high environmental impact. In this post, Ezzat Tanzila Evana looks ahead, and discusses if and how European-style Digital Product Passports may be a viable […]
  • Sri Lanka, the IMF and Pathways to Economic Stability
    Sri Lanka has had a long association with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since her independence in 1948 — in fact, the latest loan (in 2023) is its 17th IMF support package. In this post, Tharindu Udayanga Kamburawala analyses the trends and reasons behind Sri Lanka’s recurring reliance on the IMF, and suggests ways forward towards […]