“The management of Artificial Intelligence technology should be the biggest priority for the international community.” To what extent do you agree?
The erosion of multilateralism since the turn of the century has been characterised by visceral geopolitical tensions and socio-economic struggles. A cascade of crises facing the international community continues to unfold at the precipice of a technological revolution, yet none of these threaten to permanently redefine the social contract as much as Artificial Intelligence (AI). Recognising the breadth and gravity of AI’s underlying issues, the shortfall in its global governance and also its potential benefits underscore its paramount importance over other priorities. AI exhibits an ever-growing capability to transform our societies, catalysing change on multiple fronts. However, it stands at a pivotal juncture, as inherent structural weaknesses risk undermining its benefits and unravelling the fabric of our society. In the midst of a permacrisis (Brown, El-Erian and Spence, 2023), its management requires undivided attention to engineer a new era of radical abundance.
The range of risks of unregulated AI is extensive and threatens to inflict irreversible consequences. Politically, it can harm democratic discourse, as the increased proliferation of misinformation has the potential to manipulate viewpoints and empower autocracies (Guterres, 2022). Ethical concerns also come to the fore, as AI is a technology that can perpetuate existing biases in data sets, driving increased unregulated discrimination. Social tension and anti-establishment support will further ensue if the predicted large-scale job displacement is not mitigated by economic equity. Re-skilling and re-distribution strategies will need to be elevated to the forefront of domestic policies to recognise the profound change in work brought by AI (Jones, Bucsher, Wallace, 2023). On the topic of shifting power dynamics, experts warn that Big Tech might become increasingly influential non-state actors in the international sphere (Chow, Perrigo, 2023) as ‘super firms – hubs of wealth and knowledge’ (Szczepański, 2019). The data they gather and optimize through AI can exploit consumers’ information and violate their privacy to drive higher profits (Acemoglu, 2021). What is even more concerning is that AI could introduce unprecedented security vulnerabilities. Malicious actors could circumvent safety protocols to execute cyber-attacks at scale, and use ‘drug-discovery tools to build chemical weapons’ (Centre for AI Safety, 2023) and, in more extreme scenarios, possess the ability to autonomously identify and select targets (Boden, 2023). Finally, another reason to prioritize the management of AI is to ensure that the future increase in energy required by this power-hungry technology is carefully optimized and sourced renewably.
Having outlined the extent of the risks, a significant issue also looms over how to craft AI’s international governance. Large-scale debates and policy proposals continue to percolate throughout international institutions on this issue. While ‘Recommendations on the Ethics of AI’ (UNESCO, 2021) and AI principles (OECD, 2019) have been put forward, G7 leaders have recognised that regulatory responses are not ‘keeping pace’ (G7, 2023). While the EU AI Act (2023) is making the most significant steps toward a fair and ethical legislation¹, effective management remains reliant on urgent multilateral collaboration. The Centre for AI Safety (2023) has even called for a moratorium to arrest the development of new models until appropriate restrictions are put in place in order to avoid drastic consequences coming to fruition. Current regulations are clearly not adequate to effectively manage the potential downside, thus highlighting further the need to prioritise AI’s management.
Despite the prevailing dystopian narrative, another reason why we should give precedence to global AI governance also comes from the positive “explosion in improvement of the human condition’ that it can ignite (Lowcock, 2023). Predicted to boost the global economy by over fifteen trillion dollars by 2030 (PwC, 2023) after years of low productivity since the global financial crisis, AI can revolutionise myriad sectors. The healthcare industry will benefit from faster detection of diseases, more personalised treatments, and advancements in medicines. The World Economic Forum (2023) also highlighted how progress in AI could transform education systems and make them more equitable, providing tailored teaching with virtual tutors (Kopp, Thomsen, 2023). Furthermore, through removing repetitive activities, job automation (cited more often as a negative outcome of AI implementation) will allow the workforce to invest time in more fulfilling activities and acquire new skills to prolong careers. Perhaps the shorter work weeks envisaged by John Maynard Keynes almost one hundred years ago (Keynes, 1930) could become a reality if the rewards of economic growth, driven by enhanced productivity, are fairly redistributed. Crucially, AI will also unlock solutions to combat climate change and solve water shortages, preserving communities and saving lives in a more sustainable world (Victor, 2019). Evidently the prioritisation of AI’s management will have the broadest repercussions on fundamental existential issues.
In conclusion, the complex challenge of AI technology’s management must be at the forefront of the international community’s agenda. The urgent necessity for a new governance framework to preserve humans’ autonomy as free agents, before we even begin to consider AI’s mitigation and optimisation, is clear. At this critical threshold, what fundamentally elevates the management of AI to such prominence is the unpredictability of its transformation, the risk of its misuse and the breadth of its opportunities.
¹ On 14 June 2023, the European Parliament reached a conclusive standpoint on the AI Act. The Act assigned AI applications to four risk categories: unacceptable, high, limited and minimal. As the level of risk increases, so do the legal obligations.
by Niccolo Silvestri, King’s College School Wimbledon
Reference List
(All sites accessed between 13 September – 9 October 2023)
Acemoglu, D. 2021, “Harms of AI”, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, [Online]. Available at: https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Harms%20of%20AI.pdf
Boden, M. A. 2017, “Mapping the Future of AI” Project Syndicate, [Online]. Published on Feb 23, 2017. Available at: https://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/artificial-intelligence-no-singularity-by-margaret-a–boden 2017-02
Brown, G., El-Erian, M. and Spence, M. 2023. “Permacrisis: A Plan to Fix a Fractured World”. London: Simon & Schuster UK.
Chow, A., Perrigo, B. 2023, “The AI Arms Race Is Changing Everything” Times Online, [Online], 17th February. Available at: https://time.com/6255952/ai-impact chatgpt-microsoft-google/
European Parliament. (2023, June 8). “EU AI Act: First Regulation on Artificial Intelligence” Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
Guterres, A. 2023, “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence” [Online]. Available at: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2023-07-18/secretary-generals remarks-the-security-council-artificial-intelligence
Jones, K., Bucsher, M., Wallace, J. 2022, “Challenges of AI, 2022” Chatham House, [Online]. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/03/challenges-ai
Keynes, J. M. (1930). “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren” The Nation and Athenæum. [Online] Available at: https://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/archive/keynes_persuasion/Economic_Possibil ities_for_our_Grandchildren.htm
Kopp, W., & Thomsen, B. S. (2023, May 1). “AI Can Accelerate Students’ Holistic Development and Teaching Fulfillment”. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/05/ai-accelerate-students-holistic development-teaching-fulfilling.
Lowcock, M. 2023, “The World’s Most Beautiful Picture“, Talk at KCS Wimbledon, 5th October.
OECD. 2019, “OECD AI Principles Overview” [Online]. Available at: https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles.
PwC (2023) ‘Exploiting the AI Revolution: PwC’s Global Artificial Intelligence Study‘ [Online] Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/data-and analytics/publications/artificial-intelligence-study.html.
Szczepański, M. 2019, “Economic impacts of artificial intelligence (AI)” European Parliamentary Research Service, [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(201 9)637967_EN.pdf
Victor, D. G. (2019). “How Artificial Intelligence Will Affect the Future of Energy and Climate”. Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how artificial-intelligence-will-affect-the-future-of-energy-and-climate/
UNESCO. 2021, “Recommendations on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence” [Online]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
Bibliography
Ahuja, A. 2023, “The dark side of using AI to design drugs” Financial Times, [Online], 18th March. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/43102ee8-bee0-4803-bc51- 4a313f04d550
Afina, Y., & Buchser, M. 2023, “AI Governance Must Balance Creativity with Sensitivity” [Expert Comment]. Published on 7 June 2023. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/06/ai-governance-must-balance-creativity sensitivity
Allen, D. 2023, “Artificial Intelligence is Developing at an Alarming Rate. Tech Leaders Want an Immediate Pause” YouTube video, Published on 30 Mar 2023. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjHmJ84tfu8
Bjorkegren, D. 2023, “Artificial Intelligence for the Poor: How to Harness the Power of AI in the Developing World” Foreign Affairs, [Online]. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/artificial-intelligence-poor.
Bellingham, J. 2023, “How AI Can Help Combat Climate Change” [Online]. Published Mar 7. Available at: https://hub.jhu.edu/2023/03/07/artificial-intelligence combat-climatechange/#:~:text=AI%20is%20one%20tool%20that,part%20of%20the%20model%20s ystem
Candelon, F., Charme di Carlo, R., De Bondt, M., & Evgeniou, T. 2021, “AI Regulation Is Coming” Harvard Business Review, [Online]. Published in the Magazine (September–October 2021). Available at: https://hbr.org/2021/09/ai regulation-is-coming
Chiappini, L. 2023, “The geopolitical effect of artificial intelligence: the implications on human rights and democracy” Mondo Internazionale, [Online]. Available at: https://mondointernazionale.org/en/focus-allegati/the-geopolitical-effect-of-artificial intelligence-the-implications-on-human-rights-and-democracy
Daws, R. 2023, “UK deputy PM warns UN that AI regulation is falling behind advances” AINEWS, [Online]. Available at: https://www.artificialintelligence news.com/2023/09/22/uk-deputy-pm-warns-un-ai-regulation-falling-behind advances/
Economist. 2023, “How to worry wisely about artificial intelligence” The Economist, [Online]. Available at: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/04/20/how-to-worry wisely-about-artificial-intelligence
Elliott, L. 2023, “AI Will End the West’s Weak Productivity and Low Growth. But Who Exactly Will Benefit?” The Guardian, [Online]. Published on Fri 7 Apr 2023. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/07/ai-artificial-intelligence west-weak-productivity-low-growth
Fioretos, O., & Tallberg, J. (2020). Abstract from “Politics and Theory of Global Governance” International Theory. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-theory/article/politics-and theory-of-global-governance/F0F84DAB9F9A441915507F4B4A3BF514
Hunt, T. 2023, “Here’s Why AI May Be Extremely Dangerous—Whether It’s Conscious or Not” Scientific American, [Online]. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-why-ai-may-be-extremely dangerous-whether-its-conscious-or-not/
Iniguez, S. 2021, “Will Our Computer Overlords Be Good or Evil? (Hobbes vs. Rousseau)” Linkedin.com, [Online]. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/our computer-overlords-good-evil-santiago-iniguez
Inderfurth, K. 2023, “The government should make AI a top priority” Washington Post Online, [Online], 28th July. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/28/government-ai-top-priority
Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment. In The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (pp. 349-390). National Bureau of Economic Research, [Online]. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/14018.html
Lee, A. T.-G. 2023, “Leviathan and Cybernetics” [Online], Sublation Magazine, 24 February. Available at: https://www.sublationmag.com/post/leviathan-and cybernetics
Loeffler, J. 2019, “Bentham, Hobbes, and the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence” Interesting Engineering. [Online]. Available at: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/bentham-hobbes-and-the-ethics-of artificial-intelligence
Marr, B. 2023, “The 15 biggest risks of artificial intelligence” Forbes, [Online]. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/06/02/the-15-biggest risks-of-artificial-intelligence
Monbiot, G. 2017, “George Monbiot: how do we get out of this mess?” The Guardian Online, [Online], 9th September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/09/george-monbiot-how-de-we-get out-of-this-mess
Muggah, R., & Szabó, I. 2023, “Artificial Intelligence Will Entrench Global Inequality” Foreign Policy, [Online]. Published May 29, 2023. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/05/29/ai-regulation-global-south-artificial-intelligence/
Mytton, D. (2023, February 27). Influencing the Carbon Emissions of AI. [Online] Available at: https://www.devsustainability.com/p/influencing-carbon-emissions-of-ai
Ní Aoláin, F. 2023, “Alarming misuse of high-risk technologies in global fight against terrorism, says UN expert” United Nations Website, [Online]. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/03/alarming-misuse-high-risk technologies-global-fight-against-terrorism-says
Pissarides, C. 2023, “The More I Study AI, the More Optimistic I Get About the Labour Market” [Online]. LSE Business Review, 18 September. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2023/09/18/christopher-pissarides-the-more-i study-ai-the-more-optimistic-i-get-about-the-labour-market/
Reis, L. 2023, “4 Geopolitical Risks of the Rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the Global Security” The Atlas Report, [Online]. Available at: https://atlas-report.com/4- geopolitical-risks-of-the-rise-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-for-the-global-security
Reuel, A. and Marcus, G. 2023, “The world needs an international agency for artificial intelligence, say two AI experts” The Economist, [Online]. Available at: https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2023/04/18/the-world-needs-an international-agency-for-artificial-intelligence-say-two-ai-experts
Rotman, D. 2022, “How to Solve AI’s Inequality Problem” [Online]. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/19/1049378/ai-inequality-problem/
Shapiro, J., & Cota, J. 2023, “An Overview of Global AI Regulation and What’s Next” Progressive Policy Institute, [Online]. Published on 03 August 2023. Available at: https://www.progressivepolicy.org/blogs/an-overview-and-of-global-ai-regulation-and whats-next/
Soral, S. 2023, “The Industrial Revolution for Human Intellect” Deloitte Website. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/consulting/articles/sulabh-on ai.html
“The Role of Multilateral Cooperation in Shaping AI Governance” YouTube video, The Institute of World Politics, Published on 25 May 2023. Presented by Mr. Mohammed Motiwala. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial intelligence/recommendation-ethics
LSE Festival: People and Change. 2023. “How is AI Changing the World?” [Talk]. Hosted by LSE Festival: People and Change. 17 June 2023, London School of Economics. Speakers: Dr. Christine Chow, Dr. Thomas Ferretti, Dr. Giulia Gentile, Professor Michael Wooldridge. Chair: Ayse Gizem Yasar. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/LSE-Festival/2023/events/20230617/ai