LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Linda Woodhead

Greg Smith

October 9th, 2018

‘The majority of Anglicans in England, churchgoing or not, favour Brexit’: The EU as a perceived threat to English culture

1 comment | 2 shares

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Linda Woodhead

Greg Smith

October 9th, 2018

‘The majority of Anglicans in England, churchgoing or not, favour Brexit’: The EU as a perceived threat to English culture

1 comment | 2 shares

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Two-thirds of Anglicans voted for Brexit, a much higher proportion than in the country as a whole. Linda Woodhead and Greg Smith look at the reasons for the disparity and note the divergence between the beliefs of UK evangelicals – including the Archbishop of Canterbury – and ‘normal’ Anglicans.

Flickr, Steve Day, Creative Commons

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has been busy again attacking the markets and calling for more welfare. His views are at variance with those of ordinary Anglicans, two-thirds of whom think that welfare spending is too high.

Research we have just published reveals an equally significant ‘values gap’ when it comes to the EU. In the run up to the referendum of 2016 Welby was against Brexit, but in the vote Anglicans strongly supported it. Our exit poll of 3,242 UK adults, commissioned by Linda Woodhead immediately after the referendum, shows that exactly two-thirds (66%) of the Anglicans in England who cast a vote, voted to leave the EU. That’s higher than for England as a whole, where just over half of voters (53%) chose Leave.

Anglicans are more enthusiastically pro-Brexit than affiliates of other major religions. In England, 55% of Catholics voted Leave, 45% Remain. Amongst other non-Christian faiths – though sample sizes are small – the tendency was to favour Remain over Leave. The increasingly large group who report ‘no religion’ also favoured Remain: 53% Remain, 47% Leave.

Anglican support for Brexit is so high that it’s natural to think that the fact of being Church of England may be disguising other factors. For example, we know that Anglicans tend to be older than the population as a whole, and that older people were more likely to vote Leave. We tested this by correcting for all the factors that might have influenced, including age, region of residence, gender, and social class. This shows that age and social class do make a difference. Nevertheless, even when all these factors are corrected for, the ‘Anglican effect’ remains. Table 1 shows this most clearly.

Table 1: Percentage of voters voting Leave: All England, CofE, None (No Religion)

All CofE None
All 53 66 47
Female 57 68 50
Male 50 64 44
ABC1 46 63 37
C2DE 64 71 63
Under 40 37 49 35
40-59 57 66 51
Over 60 66 72 61
London 41 57 35

 

Of course, being ‘Anglican’ for these purposes is purely a matter of stated self-definition and sense of belonging. It may be that active churchgoers – who are only a small minority amongst Anglicans – take a different view, closer to that of the Archbishop.

Earlier surveys carried out by Woodhead in 2013 allow us to test this hypothesis, because they asked about voting intention in a referendum on the EU, as well as frequency of church attendance. They show that Anglicans who go to church regularly (at least once a month) are indeed more likely to say they would vote Remain – but they are still in a minority. The majority of Anglicans in England, churchgoing or not, favour Brexit.

These earlier polls also shed some light on why Anglicans are so pro-Brexit, despite what their leaders tell them. They show that Anglicans are generally centre-right in politics but liberal on matters of personal morality. Newspapers like the Telegraph or Daily Mail reflect their views. They take a generally negative view of the EU, with a quarter saying they can see no benefit at all in being a member. What they object to most are ‘EU rules and regulations’, followed by weak borders and unchecked immigration, and taking power from Parliament. Over half object to every one of these things. After that come economic objections.

In other words, most Anglicans take a positive view of English culture and ethnicity, and regard the EU as a threat to their heritage, values, identity and parliamentary sovereignty. These concerns, which are sometimes lumped together as ‘nativist’, are greater even than their economic ones.

By contrast, none of these concerns figure highly in the statements of the Archbishops.

Greg Smith’s surveys of evangelical opinion in the UK suggest an interesting reason why. He finds that evangelical Christians in the UK differ significantly from their counterparts in the US. Both groups are predominantly white, but in the UK evangelicals are generally of a much higher socio-economic status and have a more global, cosmopolitan outlook. In the US, the evangelical vote went overwhelmingly to Trump, in the UK, evangelicals were more likely to Remain than Leave.

As an evangelical, Justin Welby’s views reflect the views of British evangelicalism more generally. Evangelicalism is increasingly influential amongst bishops and senior clergy in the Church of England, but appeals to only a minority of the laity.

Over time, as older, more traditional Anglicans die out and the CofE continues its precipitous decline, that balance may change. In the process, the CofE may move from a moderate religion of the people to a more sectarian religion for an evangelical minority. In that case, the views of Church leaders will, eventually, prevail over those of the laity.

Note: This article was originally published by the LSE Brexit blog.

About the authors

Linda Woodhead is a Professor of Politics, Philosophy and Religion at Lancaster University.

Greg Smith is an Associate Research Fellow at the William Temple Foundation.

Note: This piece gives the views of the author, and not the position of the LSE Religion and Global Society blog, nor of the London School of Economics.

About the author

Linda Woodhead

Greg Smith

Posted In: Featured | Latest

1 Comments