Peter Trubowitz, Director of the LSE’s US Centre, writes that with the Democrats offering optimism and the Republicans doom and gloom, this year’s conventions were a study in role reversals. Despite the Democrats’ positive narrative, however, 70 percent of voters feel that the country is on the wrong track. To win in November, he writes, Clinton will need to gain the support of disgruntled Sanders voters, while Trump will be looking for the votes of non-college educated whites in key battleground states.
The conventions are now in the rear view mirror. But who benefited the most — Clinton or Trump? Both candidates helped themselves shore up the support of core constituencies: Trump with white working class men; Clinton with women and minorities. Trump got a bump in the polls for his effort; Clinton will almost certainly get the same. Will it be enough to change the fundamentals of the race? Maybe. The key demographic that is still up for grabs is college-educated whites. Traditionally, they break Republican, but they have misgivings about Trump’s views about race and immigration, his refusal to disclose his tax returns, and now his relationship with Vladimir Putin. My guess is that they moved slightly closer to Clinton and the Democrats last week.
How did the conventions themselves compare? They were a study in contrasts. Republicans pointed to an America that they claim is divided and lawless. Democrats described a nation full of hope and opportunity. The conventions were also a study in role reversals. Traditionally, Democrats are the ones offering ‘doom and gloom’; Republicans, ‘optimism and patriotism.’ Not this year, and it was enough to lead some Republican commentators to see defeat ahead and call it ‘game, set, and match.’ Yet, for all the hope and optimism Democrats evoked in Philadelphia, 70 percent of likely voters think the country is on the wrong track. This election is going to be a dog fight.
What should we expect from Clinton and Trump going forward? At the end of the day, the election is going to be determined by who can get their base out. For Trump, the big question is whether there are enough non-college educated white voters to win key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin, which together with the Republican states Mitt Romney won in 2012, would give him the 270 electoral college votes needed to win the presidency. For Clinton, the key question is whether those Bernie Sanders voters will put aside their heartache and rally behind her and whether the kind of voter suppression that we’ve seen in Republican governed states in the past is kept in check.
Featured image credit: Lorie Shaull (Flickr, CC-BY-SA-2.0)
Please read our comments policy before commenting.
Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of USAPP – American Politics and Policy, nor the London School of Economics.
Shortened URL for this post: http://bit.ly/2aprwmY
Peter Trubowitz – LSE US Centre
Peter Trubowitz is Professor of International Relations, and Director of the LSE’s US Centre. His main research interests are in the fields of international security and comparative foreign policy, with special focus on American grand strategy and foreign policy. He also writes and comments frequently on U.S. party politics and elections and how they shape and are shaped by America’s changing place in the world.
In his bid to assist the election of the power elite’s favoured candidate, a certain billionaire is chasing away GOP members and many are migrating to America’s third largest party – the Libertarian Party. Membership for the Libertarian Party is up twenty times what it was in the last presidential election. In fourth place, the Green Party is robust in half of the fifty states.Might 2016 be the year that duopoly loses it monopoly on US electoral politics? No, not as long as the six billionaires who constitute mass media train their cameras and pens on fellow billionaire Trump and associated WWE tactics to scare voters to elect the former Chair of Yale’s College Republicans and DINO – Hillary Clinton. America sorely needs a second party but the two sides of the same coin one-party system is safe this election..
For Clinton to win she will need the young voters to be pragmatic and hold their noses and vote for her. Trump would take us back to a more bitter time. We need to keep moving the ball forward. Our best hope is that Trump’s coattails will negatively affect Republicans in key Senate and Congressional races. We need to get back to old fashioned “sausage making” compromise and give Clinton the chance to make real change.
I think Sanders understands that he made a great impact on the Democratic platform and Clinton will move forward with his programs in a more reasoned approach. We will get there if Sanders can sway his voters to be pragmatic and vote for Clinton.
It is curious to see how 70% of Americans think the country is on the wrong track but we are now asking them to compromise. I suggest that it will be difficult, in this polarised climate, for the next President to be re-elected and to achieve big policy goals. If Trump is where he is, there are motivations that political scientists do not understand.
The United States is looking at four years of increasing polarisation and hate.
Follow the money to the deep pockets of the billionaire power elite to discover the WWE circus of mass media generated polarisation . . .