LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

LSE BPP

April 6th, 2020

COVID-19 airport slot rules: what’s changed and what’s next for European airlines?

2 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

LSE BPP

April 6th, 2020

COVID-19 airport slot rules: what’s changed and what’s next for European airlines?

2 comments

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Steven Truxal explains why and how the rules governing slot allocation in European airports were amended in light of the novel coronavirus pandemic. He explains the implications of these changes for airlines, and concludes that air passenger rights may soon need to be amended as well.

The outbreak of COVID-19 triggered a sharp decrease in demand for air travel around the world. At the same time, many states closed their borders or took other actions to restrict movements of air travellers. Despite this, some airlines have, until very recently, continued to operate virtually empty aircraft. True, an airline operating an empty flight seems absurd; it is expensive not to mention harmful to the environment. So, what has incentivised airlines to do it? How have the COVID-19 airport slot rules, which entered into force on 1 April 2020, changed this, and what’s next for Europe’s airlines?

Airlines meet twice-yearly at worldwide slot conferences hosted by the International Air Transport Association: in June to deal with the (northern hemisphere) winter period and in November to review the summer period. Since 1947, airlines have met to discuss their airport slot allocations for the next season and explore ‘interline’ opportunities. An interline (agreement) between two or more airlines allows for a passenger to reserve flights in a single flight itinerary, which may be operated by multiple airlines. For instance, one books a trip from London to Bangkok, the segment London-Copenhagen is operated by British Airways and Copenhagen-Bangkok is flown by SAS Scandinavian Airlines.

Airlines require slots to use airport infrastructure, including runway permissions to land and take off. Demand for air travel increased dramatically after airline markets in the UK and the rest of Europe were deregulated and liberalised, and in particular with the growth of low-cost carriers. With that said, the expansion of necessary airport infrastructure has not always kept pace with demand; in turn, many airports have become congested, and airport slots are in scarce supply.

How does slot allocation work in practice?

Where capacity to access airport infrastructure exists, a ‘slot coordinator’ will allocate a series of slots from the ‘slot pool’ to an applicant airline. According to Regulation 95/93 governing European airports, an airline must operate the allocated series of slots for at least 80% of the time during the season for which it has been allocated. This is commonly referred to as the ‘use-it-or-lose-it’ or ‘80/20 rule’. Subject to this rule, which is enforced by the coordinator, slots are re-allocated with established historical precedence, ‘grandfather rights’, to incumbent air carriers.

If slots are not available, airlines may exchange slots for money or other consideration. Swaps at UK airports have been especially prevalent; the legality of which was clarified in 2008. In 2017, International Airlines Group, the parent company of British Airways, purchased airport slots from collapsed carrier Monarch Airlines for £60 million. Airport slots are valuable economic resources, so airlines are incentivised to keep hold of them – at whatever cost.

So, even in the face of COVID-19 and great economic uncertainty, airlines will continue to fly empty aircraft for fear that failing to operate for at least 80% the current season will mean that the slots will be returned to the slot pool and next season’s slots will be lost to them. That is, unless and until the rules are changed.

COVID-19 slot rules

By 2003, experience had shown that Regulation 95/93 needed strengthening through necessary amendments so as ‘to ensure the fullest and most flexible use of limited capacity at congested airports’. The following change was introduced to the slot pool provision in Article 10(4):

If the 80 % usage of the series of slots cannot be demonstrated, all the slots constituting that series shall be placed in the slot pool, unless the non-utilisation can be justified on the basis of any of the following reasons:

(a) unforeseeable and unavoidable circumstances outside the air carrier’s control leading to:

  • grounding of the aircraft type generally used for the air service in question;
  • closure of an airport or airspace;
  • serious disturbance of operations at the airports concerned, including those series of slots at other Community airports related to routes which have been affected by such disturbance, during a substantial part of the relevant scheduling period;

Whereas Article 10(4) allows slot coordinators to disregard non-operation of airport slots for periods during which the air carrier is unable to operate planned air services due to unforeseeable situations, such as closure of airports or an airspace, it does not address the novel situation of the COVID-19 outbreak. Therefore, it was essential to amend Regulation 95/93 once again.

On 13 March 2020, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, announced the much-sought change to the 80/20 rule. Under the new COVID-19 slot rules, which came into force on 1 April 2020 via amending legislation Regulation (EU) 2020/459, the 80/20 rule is suspended temporarily in the period between 1 March 2020 and 24 October 2020.

Suspension of the 80/20 rule is not unprecedented. In fact, Regulation 95/93 was amended so as temporarily to suspend the 80/20 rule following the events of 11 September 2001, during the Iraq war, during the SARS epidemic in 2003, and after the 2008/2009 Financial Crisis.

So that the European Commission may respond more quickly in future if necessary, the European Parliament and the European Council have conferred on it the power to adopt delegated acts with respect to the 80/20 rule until 2 April 2021. The Commission will monitor the situation using the new criteria, and will present a summary report to European Parliament and Council by 15 September 2020.

What’s next for Europe’s airlines?

Airlines already began to withdraw services on some routes following Von der Leyen’s announcement. Now that the new slot rules have entered into force, more cancellations are expected. UK-registered EasyJet has grounded its entire fleet; British Airways has suspended all of its London Gatwick flights; and London City Airport has closed. At the time of writing, air navigation service provider Eurocontrol reports a 86.9% drop in European air traffic.

While the new slot rules certainly bring good news for airlines as they cancel flights yet keep the slots, this is only the first hurdle. EU air passenger rights legislation requires all EU airlines and any airline operating from an EU airport to offer a passenger of a flight which has been cancelled the opportunity to re-book or receive full refund within seven days. Yet passengers who have requested refunds have instead been offered flight vouchers. The European Commission published new Interpretive Guidelines on 18 March 2020, which clarify that for flight cancellations owing to COVID-19, “If the carrier proposes a voucher, this offer cannot affect the passenger’s right to opt for reimbursement instead.” Overcoming or securing changes to the high-level of protection afforded to passengers by European consumer protection rules will be airlines’ second hurdle… Stay tuned.

________________

About the Author

Steven Truxal is Reader in Law and Associate Dean (International) at City, University of London.

 

 

All articles posted on this blog give the views of the author(s), and not the position of LSE British Politics and Policy, nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science. Featured image credit: by pixpoetry on Unsplash.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the author

LSE BPP

Posted In: British and Irish Politics and Policy | COVID-19 | Featured

2 Comments

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
This work by British Politics and Policy at LSE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported.