LSE - Small Logo
LSE - Small Logo

Sonia Livingstone

August 3rd, 2018

What’s new in ‘digital parenting’ research? Insights from the Connected Learning Summit 2018

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Sonia Livingstone

August 3rd, 2018

What’s new in ‘digital parenting’ research? Insights from the Connected Learning Summit 2018

0 comments

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

 

Connected learning has been defined as learning that is “socially embedded, interest driven and orientated towards educational, economic, or political opportunity”. In this post Sonia Livingstone outlines research from Parenting for a Digital Future, presented at the Connected Learning Summit in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which shows the many ways in which social class inequalities differentiate how parents can provide for their children’s informal learning. Sonia Livingstone is Professor of Social Psychology in the Department of Media and Communications at the London School of Economics and Political Science. [Header image credit: M. Stewart, CC BY-SA 2.0.jpg]

This year’s Connected Learning Summit, held at MIT’s Media Lab in Cambridge, Mass., attracted some 650 researchers, youth workers, educators, techies, librarians, game designers, makers and students to ask what’s new and significant in the theory, evidence, design and practice of ‘connected learning’. By this, Mimi Ito and colleagues emphasise learning that is “socially embedded, interest-driven, and oriented towards educational, economic, or political opportunity,” hypothesising that:

“Connected learning is realised when a young person is able to pursue a personal interest or passion with the support of friends and caring adults, and is in turn able to link this learning and interest to academic achievement, career success or civic engagement.”

Of particular interest to many in the digital age is whether and how the specific affordances of digital technologies can be used to enhance children and young people’s learning in this way. We can unpack this into two pressing but demanding kinds of question:

  • If digital learning sites and activities are well-designed, can they stimulate and support young people’s interests, map out learning pathways, enable collaborative learning and peer support, and link young people’s activities with needed forms of expertise and mentoring? In other words, can they revitalise, refashion, or provide an alternative to some of those traditional forms of learning that have become too instrumental, competitive, individualised?
  • Who will, and who should, benefit? Given the widespread appeal of digital technologies to young people of all social class backgrounds, can connected learning opportunities be promoted without further advantaging the already advantaged but, instead, by carefully targeting digital learning resources to benefit those who need it most?

With guiding questions like these, a lot of attention at the Connected Learning Summit focused on young people, educators, policy-makers and technology designers. But where do parents fit into this picture? Concerned that they easily get forgotten in discussions of connected learning, and building on our project, Parenting for a Digital Future, I presented two papers, co-authored with Alicia Blum-Ross.

Our findings

The first drew on our qualitative research with London parents. This reveals many ways in which social class inequalities differentiate how parents can provide for their children’s informal learning at home. This is hardly surprising, given long-term lack of social mobility in the UK. But it’s disheartening to see how digital technologies contribute to the social reproduction of dis/advantage more than they undermine it.

We also found that parents cannot be pigeonholed in binary terms as either middle class or working class. Many of the poor families we met were from ethnic minorities or migrant families, often using digital technologies to sustain diasporic or religious subcultures. Some had very little income but high levels of education, perhaps attracted by the opportunities of creative and alternative lifestyles and forms of work possible in the global city. Some were so wealthy they might merit another class category altogether.

However, whatever their income and education, most parents we interviewed are striving to support their children’s learning at home. And most are seizing on the potential of digital technology with an enthusiasm that is surely different from – and more inclusive than – previous generations’ turn to books, museums or libraries. We found a lot of dated, slow or even broken technology in the low-income homes we visited, along with some bemused or inexpert parents. However, we want to recognise and value the considerable efforts and investment that many poorer parents make. We also think it matters that they often place considerable faith in their children’s tech skills and ‘digital future‘, whether or not this comes to fruition as hoped.

Digital technologies re-inscribing inequalities?

While class categories may be complicated, especially as lived in the messy realities of family lives, our survey findings presented in our second paper at the Connected Learning Summit showed that:

  • There are few differences by socio-economic status for the amount parents and children used the internet, but there are considerable differences in the range of devices they used and in their digital skills. The importance of inequalities in skills is perhaps more obvious than that of access to a range of devices – the latter hints at the benefits of personalised, flexible control over devices.
  • As well as differences across families, there are also some meaningful similarities. Notably, parents often watch television and films with their children, as a key part of family activities, and this turn to digital media for shared positive experiences should be recognised. But some of their other uses of technologies (playing computer games together, contacting relatives and friends via Skype or similar, and using technology for creative activities) are again more common among middle class families.
  • Less surprising, but also problematic, is the finding that middle class parents more often use the internet to support their children’s learning (and, indeed, their own). This has serious implications for the role of digital technologies in supporting connected learning.

Measuring connected learning is far from easy, as we discovered in designing our survey. However, we asked parents whether they thought that:

  • Their child’s teachers value what they learn at home
  • Their child’s teachers value what they learn in extracurricular activities
  • They are well informed about what their child learns at nursery/school/college
  • What their child learns at nursery/school/college connects with their family activities at home

As we will document in an upcoming report, middle class parents are more likely to agree with all of the above. So the problem remains: insofar as connected learning is facilitated by parents’ helping their children to follow their interests across different learning sites, it may be failing to promote the social justice goals its advocates have hoped for.

To end on a positive note, the Connected Learning Alliance is developing new ideas about how to redesign learning environments – formal and nonformal, offline and online, home and elsewhere – to better support collaborative, connected and creative learning in equity-respecting ways.

This post gives the views of the authors and does not represent the position of the LSE Parenting for a Digital Future blog, nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

About the author

Sonia Livingstone

Sonia Livingstone OBE is Professor of Social Psychology in the Department of Media and Communications at LSE. Taking a comparative, critical and contextual approach, her research examines how the changing conditions of mediation are reshaping everyday practices and possibilities for action. She has published twenty books on media audiences, media literacy and media regulation, with a particular focus on the opportunities and risks of digital media use in the everyday lives of children and young people. Her most recent book is The class: living and learning in the digital age (2016, with Julian Sefton-Green). Sonia has advised the UK government, European Commission, European Parliament, Council of Europe and other national and international organisations on children’s rights, risks and safety in the digital age. She was awarded the title of Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) in 2014 'for services to children and child internet safety.' Sonia Livingstone is a fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, the British Psychological Society, the Royal Society for the Arts and fellow and past President of the International Communication Association (ICA). She has been visiting professor at the Universities of Bergen, Copenhagen, Harvard, Illinois, Milan, Oslo, Paris II, Pennsylvania, and Stockholm, and is on the editorial board of several leading journals. She is on the Executive Board of the UK Council for Child Internet Safety, is a member of the Internet Watch Foundation’s Ethics Committee, is an Expert Advisor to the Council of Europe, and was recently Special Advisor to the House of Lords’ Select Committee on Communications, among other roles. Sonia has received many awards and honours, including honorary doctorates from the University of Montreal, Université Panthéon Assas, the Erasmus University of Rotterdam, the University of the Basque Country, and the University of Copenhagen. She is currently leading the project Global Kids Online (with UNICEF Office of Research-Innocenti and EU Kids Online), researching children’s understanding of digital privacy (funded by the Information Commissioner’s Office) and writing a book with Alicia Blum-Ross called ‘Parenting for a Digital Future (Oxford University Press), among other research, impact and writing projects. Sonia is chairing LSE’s Truth, Trust and Technology Commission in 2017-2018, and participates in the European Commission-funded research networks, DigiLitEY and MakEY. She runs a blog called www.parenting.digital and contributes to the LSE’s Media Policy Project blog. Follow her on Twitter @Livingstone_S

Posted In: Our publications