On this page

 

Introduction

CommitteeThe Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (the “Commission”) was established in 1959 at the 5th Meeting of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs and is one of the primary institutions that make up the Inter-American system for the protection of human rights. It is a quasi-judicial body that now receives 1,500 individual complaints per year. Based in Washington D.C. (USA) the Commission consists of seven independent human rights experts serving four-year terms, once renewable. Each experts is nominated by his/her member state and elected by the OAS General Assembly. These experts contribute to the general work of the Commission and are individually designated as a Rapporteur on specific OAS states and thematic areas of concern. Thematic rapporteurships include:

In 1976, the American Convention on Human Rights entered into force and the OAS Charter has been amended to include the Commission as the primary human rights body of the OAS. The work of the Commission is built on three main pillars:

  • Individual complaints
  • Monitoring human rights in member states
  • Focus on thematic areas on concern

The Commission has an Executive Secretariat of professional and administrative staff to help Commissioners carry out their work, managing correspondence with petitioners and states and preparing cases and petitions for Commissioners’ decisions.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights is responsible for (Article 41, American Convention on Human Rights):

  • Developing an awareness of human rights among the peoples of America;
  • Making recommendations to the governments of the member states, when it considers such action advisable, for the adoption of progressive measures in favour of human rights within the framework of their domestic law and constitutional provisions as well as appropriate measures to further the observance of those rights;
  • Preparing studies or reports as it considers advisable in the performance of its duties;
  • Requesting the governments of the member states to supply it with information on the measures adopted by them in matters of human rights;
  • Responding, through the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, to inquiries made by the member states on matters related to human rights and, within the limits of its possibilities, to provide those states with the advisory services they request;
  • Taking action on individual complaints and other communications
  • Submitting an annual report to the General Assembly.

iconLockWant to learn more about how the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights operates? Watch an informational video produced by the International Justice Resource Center

How does it help tackle violence against women?

The Commission has identified the protection of the rights of women as a priority objective for the Americas and continues to work on tackling violence against women through its 3 pillars. In addition to this work, the Commission has also appointed a Rapporteur on the Rights of Women who has identified the eradication of violence against women as a special area of concern.

iconStarCivil Society Engagement: Thematic Hearings and Individual Complaints

CSOs and other advocates are also invited to participate in the Commission’s activities through two types of hearings: thematic hearings and case-based hearings (Chapter VI, Rules of Procedure). These hearings can relate to general VAW-related areas of concern or individual petitions claiming VAW-related violations.


Thematic Hearings

 
CSOs and other advocates may submit thematic hearing requests to the Commission. These thematic hearings are used by the Commission to compile up-to-date information on a human rights issue impacting one or more states within the OAS. Prior to the Commission’s sessions, CSOs may also submit requests for thematic hearings on violence against women or related topics. These types of hearings may be used by advocates as part of a wider advocacy strategy, including raising awareness at a regional-level, focusing the work of the Commission on a specific VAW-related topic and reinforcing advocacy efforts also taking place within the United Nations.
 
When a thematic hearing involves a single OAS member state, the hearing will usually last one hour. During this time, government delegations and members of civil society are invited to speak. When a multi-country hearing takes place, the hearings usually last 45 minutes. This is because the Commission does not allow government delegations and uses the time to gather information from civil society on the issue concerned. Thematic hearing requests may be submitted via the Commission’s online portal (note: the system will not accept submissions over a certain size). These requests will be subject to submission deadlines and interested parties are encouraged to check requirements for submission online for the most up-to-date information.
 
You can check the Commission’s database for video of past sessions and activities on the rights of women or take a look at the full calendar to view all upcoming events

 

 


Individual Petitions/Complaints (Case-based Hearings)

 
The right of individual complaint gives particular strength to the Belém do Pará Convention. Individual, groups or organisations can file a complaint to the Commission about a member state’s violation or failure to protect women’s human rights. Complaints must fall within the scope of the one of Inter-American human rights treaties:

Admissibility Requirements

Before filing a petition, certain requirements must be met. These determine the ‘admissibility’ of the petition and are the first step in ensuring the Commission may hear a case. Broadly, these requirements are:

  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies. The applicant must have pursued and exhausted available remedies under domestic law in accordance with generally recognised principles of international law (Article 46.1 American Convention on Human Rights)
    • Note: There are exceptions to this requirement. Article 46.2 of the American Convention on Human Rights asserts that:
      • a. the domestic legislation of the state concerned does not afford due process of law for the protection of the right or rights that have allegedly been violated;
      • b. the party alleging violation of his rights has been denied access to the remedies under domestic law or has been prevented from exhausting them;
      • c. there has been unwarranted delay in rendering a final judgment under the aforementioned remedies.
  • Time limit. The petition must be filed within 6 months of the date of notification of the final judicial decision that exhausted all possible domestic remedies
    • Note: There are exceptions to this requirement. Article 46.2 of the American Convention on Human Rights asserts that:
      • a. the domestic legislation of the state concerned does not afford due process of law for the protection of the right or rights that have allegedly been violated;
      • b. the party alleging violation of his rights has been denied access to the remedies under domestic law or has been prevented from exhausting them;
      • c. there has been unwarranted delay in rendering a final judgment under the aforementioned remedies.
  • Relevance. The petition must relate to the specific human rights treaties above. A petition cannot be filed simply because someone is unhappy with the outcome.

For further elaboration on exceptions to the exhaustion of domestic remedies and time limit for individual petitions to the Commission, see the Inter-American Court of Human Right’s advisory opinion (10 August 1990): ‘Exceptions to the Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies (Arts. 46(1), 46(2)(a) and 46 (2)(b) of the American Convention on Human Rights)‘)

Outcomes

If the state is found to have violated a person’s rights, the Commission must determine what the state must do to repair the damage and prevent the recurrence of a similar situation. These ruling not only define specific obligations for the state concerned, but for all member states. Each ruling is an interpretation and application of the Convention which defines what human rights treaties mean in certain circumstances. If, for any reason, the Commission is unable to resolve a case, it may refer the case to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to reach a conclusion. In certain cases of serious and urgent concern, the Commission may also adopt precautionary measures to protect individuals from further human rights violations.

Learn how and where to file a petition through the Commission’s informational brochure or access the individual petition system portal for more in-depth information. You can also take a look at some of the Commission’s landmark decisions on VAW cases by visiting our ‘Landmark Cases’ page.

Note: the Commission does not have the authority to decide the guilt or innocence of an individual, nor can it overturn a state’s ruling in this regard. It may only issue judgments regarding state’s compliance with their human rights obligations and issue recommendations. It should also be noted that complaints may only be made against a member state if that state has ratified the relevant conventions under the Commission’s authority.

 

 


 
iconLockWant more? Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute has produced a resource on ‘Using thematic hearings at the Inter-American Human Rights Commission to advance U.S. human rights accountability’ which contains information hearing request, communications and other materials that may be useful outside of the USA context

Contact Information 

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Organization of American States
1889 F St NW
Washington, D.C., 20006
United States of America

Tel. +1 (202) 370 9000 | Fax: +1 (202) 458 3650 / +1 (202) 458 6215
cidhoea@oas.org 


Icon Key

key1 key2 keyy3